| Literature DB >> 34493269 |
Nazreen F Hadjirin1, Eric L Miller2, Gemma G R Murray3, Phung L K Yen4, Ho D Phuc4, Thomas M Wileman3, Juan Hernandez-Garcia3, Susanna M Williamson5, Julian Parkhill3, Duncan J Maskell6, Rui Zhou7, Nahuel Fittipaldi8, Marcelo Gottschalk8, A W Dan Tucker3, Ngo Thi Hoa4, John J Welch9, Lucy A Weinert3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the gravest threats to human health and food security worldwide. The use of antimicrobials in livestock production can lead to emergence of AMR, which can have direct effects on humans through spread of zoonotic disease. Pigs pose a particular risk as they are a source of zoonotic diseases and receive more antimicrobials than most other livestock. Here we use a large-scale genomic approach to characterise AMR in Streptococcus suis, a commensal found in most pigs, but which can also cause serious disease in both pigs and humans.Entities:
Keywords: Beta-lactam resistance; Ecology; Genotype to phenotype; Pig; Prediction model; Tiamulin; Trimethoprim
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34493269 PMCID: PMC8422772 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01094-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
Fig. 1.Candidate AMR determinants explain most of the variation in MIC. Histograms of log transformed MIC measures for each of our 16 different antibiotics, across our panel of 678 S. suis isolates. Antibiotics are coloured by their class (Beta: beta-lactams; MLSB: macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B; Tetra: tetracyclines; Fluoro: fluoroquinolones; Amino: aminoglycoside; Pleuro: pleuromutilin; TMP: trimethoprim and Phen: phenicol). In the 16 square panels, the left-hand histograms (labelled 0) show the MIC values for isolates that carry no determinant for that antibiotic class, while the right-hand histograms (labelled 1+) show the MIC values for isolates carrying one or more such determinant. If all resistance determinants perfectly explain MIC, then we expect to see histogram distributions on the bottom left (low MIC, no determinant) and the top right (high MIC, presence of candidate determinant(s)). For the first antimicrobial in each class, we show the number of candidate AMR determinants in square brackets, along with the number of isolates where candidate determinants are absent or present. r2 values show the proportion of the variance explained in a standard ANOVA by the presence of one or more candidate determinant
Ecological and genomic predictors of MIC
| Analysis | #strains | Fixed effects | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | 678 | Antibiotic | 15 | 1404.125 | < 10−15 |
| genetic cluster | 29 | 40.644 | < 10−15 | ||
| (b) | 450 | Antibiotic | 15 | 972.3107 | < 10−4 |
| Year | 1 | 6.6078 | 0.0102 | ||
| Serotype | 1 | 6.6261 | 0.0101 | ||
| Disease status | 2 | 2.9760 | 0.0511 | ||
| Country | 3 | 92.5155 | < 10−4 | ||
| (c) | 678 | Antibiotic | 15 | 1457.4043 | < 10−4 |
| Country | 3 | 139.5902 | < 10−4 | ||
| (d) | 557 | Antibiotic | 15 | 1144.3846 | < 10−4 |
| Disease status | 2 | 9.9619 | < 10−4 | ||
| (e) | 542 | Antibiotic | 15 | 1131.6347 | < 10−4 |
| Serotype | 1 | 8.7216 | 0.0032 | ||
| (f) | 652 | Antibiotic | 15 | 1350.8781 | < 10−4 |
| Year | 1 | 0.1591 | 0.69 |
Fig. 2.Differences in MICs between subsets of the data. Each row compares two subsets of the isolates: A the 423 isolates from UK pigs, and the 205 isolates from Canadian pigs. B the 50 isolates from Vietnam (all of which are from the genetic cluster ‘BAPS4’: Additional file 2, Figure S1), and the 112 BAPS4 isolates from the UK and Canada. C the 22 Vietnamese isolates from pigs, and the 28 Vietnamese isolates from people. Left-hand panels compare the mean log MICs for each antibiotic. Consistent deviations from the dotted 1:1 line suggest consistently higher or lower MICs in that subset of the data (so the rightward shift in panel A shows that MICs are consistently higher in Canada). Right-hand panels show the proportion of isolates that carry each of the 43 candidate AMR determinants. Each point or bar is coloured according to its drug class, according to the colour scheme in Fig. 1
AMR determinants of Streptococcus suis
| AMR gene | Name in figures | Resistance conferred (Antibiotic Class) | No. of isolates | Reported in | Reported in other species (CARD and NCBI) | Reported genetic location in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ant4Ib | Aminoglycoside | 1 | This report | Plasmid | ||
| ant6Ia | Aminoglycoside | 56 | [ | Plasmid, ICE | ||
| ant6Ib | Aminoglycoside | 12 | This report | Pathogenicity Island | ||
| ant9Ia | Aminoglycoside | 45 | [ | Plasmid, ICE | ||
| aph3IIIa | Aminoglycoside | 46 | [ | Plasmid, transposon | ||
| ant1 | Aminoglycoside | 12 | This report | Plasmid, ICE | ||
| aadE1 | Aminoglycoside | 2 | This report | Plasmid | ||
| aadE2 | Aminoglycoside | 5 | This report | ICE | ||
| ermB | MLSB (Macrolide/ Lincosamide | 370 | [ | Plasmid, ICE | ||
| ermG | MLSB (Macrolide/ Lincosamide | 1 | This report | Conjugative transposon | ||
| ermT | MLSB (Macrolide/ Lincosamide) | 3 | This report | Plasmid | ||
| mefA | Macrolide | 11 | [ | Transposon, ICE | ||
| mel | Macrolide | 9 | [ | Transposon, ICE | ||
| lnuB | Lincosamide | 3 | [ | Plasmid | ||
| linB | Lincosamide | 42 | [ | |||
| lnuC | Lincosamide | 9 | [ | Plasmid | ||
| lsaE | Pleuromutilin | 43 | [ | Plasmid, ICE | ||
| tet44 | Tetracycline | 4 | This report | ICE | ||
| tetM | Tetracycline | 81 | [ | Plasmid, ICE | ||
| tetM1 | Tetracycline | 34 | This report | Plasmid, transposon | ||
| tetM2 | Tetracycline | 43 | This report | |||
| tetM3 | Tetracycline | 13 | This report | Transposon, ICE | ||
| tetO | Tetracycline | 465 | [ | ICE, plasmid | ||
| tetO1 | Tetracycline | 2 | This report | Conjugative transposon | ||
| tetW | Tetracycline | 8 | [ | Plasmid | ||
| tet40 | Tetracycline | 7 | [ | Composite mobile genetic element, ICE | ||
| tetL | Tetracycline | 12 | [ | Plasmid | ||
| tetO:W:32:O | Tetracycline | 20 | [ | ICE | ||
| dfrF | TMP | 11 | This report | plasmid | ||
| dfrK | TMP | 7 | This report | plasmid | ||
| vgaF | Pleuromutilin | 173 | This report | Not known | Chromosome. Found as an intact gene (~ 1386 bp) or truncated (< 750 bp) | |
| cat | Florfenicol | 3 | This report | Plasmid, Transposon | ||
| DHFR102 | TMP | 235 | This report | Mutations in I100L in | DHFR: I102L | |
| DHFRPromoter | TMP | 86 | This report | None reported | DHFR : A5G upstream/indels 0-30 bp upstream | |
| PBP2B:hap | Penicillin | 181 | This report | Mutations in other locations in | PBP2B : K479T/A, D512E/Q/K/A, K513E/D,T515S | |
| PBP2X:hap | Ceftiofur | 93 | This report | None reported | PBP2X : M437L, S445T, T467S Y525F | |
| PBP2X551 | Penicillin | 153 | This report | Mutation in PBP2X in | PBP2X : T551S | |
| PBP2X594:596 | Penicillin | 15 | [ | PBP2X : L594Y/F, V596G | ||
| PBP2X569 | Penicillin | 10 | [ | PBP2X : N569Q | ||
| MraY:hap | Penicillin | 62 | This report | None reported | MraY : M6I/L and either A4S/T or G8S | |
| ParC79 | Fluoroquinolone | 4 | [ | ParC : S79 | ||
| GyrA81 | Fluoroquinolone | 13 | [ | GyrA : S81 | ||
| GyrA85 | Fluoroquinolone | 1 | [ | GyrA : E85 |
*Novel determinants reported in this study
† Not documented in the CARD database
MLS macrolide-linocsomide-streptogramin B, TMP trimethoprim
Fig. 3.High levels of multidrug resistance in S. suis. The upper panel shows the number of our 678 isolates that carry a given number of candidate AMR determinants. The low panel shows the number of isolates that carry one or more AMR determinant for a given number of drug classes. Results show that more isolates carry determinants against 5 drug classes than carry no determinant at all.
Fig. 4.Beta-lactam resistance determinants have additive effects and appear in a consistent order. The left-hand panel shows that the candidate determinants against the beta-lactam drug class often appear in a consistent order. For example, the mutation at site 551 of PBP2X tends to appear in backgrounds that already carry mutations in PBP2B. The plot was generated according to the method and plotting convention of [28], where each row represents an isolate, and those isolates that fit the nested pattern are shown in pink. Results show that 93.5% (634/678) of our isolates fit the nested pattern. The right-hand plots show the log MIC values for these 634 isolates, comparing isolates carrying different numbers of candidate determinants.