Literature DB >> 19020423

Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer.

Martin G Myers1, Miguel Valdivieso, Alexander Kiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimum interval between serial blood pressure measurements using an automated BpTRU sphygmomanometer.
METHODS: Two groups of 200 patients each had automated office measurements taken using the BpTRU device at either 1-min or 2-min intervals from the start of one reading to the start of the next reading with a 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) recording being performed. Another series of 50 patients had BpTRU readings taken at 1-min and 2-min intervals before and after 24-h ABP monitoring. The difference between the mean awake ABP and the mean automated office BP readings were compared for recordings taken at 1-min versus 2-min intervals.
RESULTS: In the between-patient comparison (n=400), mean awake ABP was similar to automated BP recordings in the examining room at either 1-min or 2-min intervals except for a slightly lower (-4 mmHg) diastolic BP with the 1-min interval (P<0.01 vs. ABP). In the within-patient comparison (n=50), there was no consistent difference between automated BP readings taken in the examining room at 1-min versus 2-min intervals. Overall, the mean automated BP values tended to be slightly lower than the mean awake ABP.
CONCLUSION: Automated measurement of BP in the office setting with devices such as the BpTRU can be taken as frequently as every 1 min without affecting the accuracy of the reading. Small differences in BP between the 1 and 2-min settings and between the automated BpTRU and ABP readings were within accepted clinical standards for validation criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19020423     DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283104247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  23 in total

Review 1.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Clinical Implications of Different Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques.

Authors:  Paul Drawz
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  A novel approach to office blood pressure measurement: 30-minute office blood pressure vs daytime ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Mark C van der Wel; Iris E Buunk; Chris van Weel; Theo A B M Thien; J Carel Bakx
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 4.  Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Janusz Kaczorowski; Martin Dawes; Marshall Godwin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Methods of Blood Pressure Assessment Used in Milestone Hypertension Trials.

Authors:  Yi Chen; Lei Lei; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-18

6.  Aldosterone Antagonists or Renin-Guided Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: A Comparative Effectiveness Pilot Study in Primary Care.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Marilyn A Laken; Susan E Sutherland; Suparna Qanungo; Douglas O Fleming; Anne G Cook; William H Hester; Kelly W Jones; Gerard C Jebaily; Gregory T Valainis; Charles F Way; Mary Beth Wright; Robert A Davis
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 7.  The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Why automated office blood pressure should now replace the mercury sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  More reasons to use automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  A Short History of Automated Office Blood Pressure - 15 Years to SPRINT.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.