Literature DB >> 31378617

Bats Actively Use Leaves as Specular Reflectors to Detect Acoustically Camouflaged Prey.

Inga Geipel1, Jan Steckel2, Marco Tschapka3, Dieter Vanderelst4, Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler5, Elisabeth K V Kalko3, Herbert Peremans6, Ralph Simon7.   

Abstract

Filtering relevant signals from noisy sensory input is a crucial challenge for animals [1, 2]. Many bats are acoustic specialists relying on sound to find prey. They discern salient acoustic signals from irrelevant background masking noise. It has long been considered a sensory impossibility for bats to use solely echolocation for the detection of silent and motionless prey resting directly on foliage due to the masking effects of background echoes [3, 4]. Some bats, however, do successfully perform this seemingly impossible task [5], raising the question-what underlying acoustic and behavioral mechanisms do bats use to solve this conundrum? To address this question, we used biomimetic sonar to record high-resolution measurements of echoes from insects resting on leaves. Based on our echo recordings, we predicted optimal approach angles from which masking echoes can best be avoided. In behavioral experiments, we put these predictions to test. We recorded the prey approach behavior of wild bats in a flight cage equipped with an ultrasonic microphone synchronized with two high-speed cameras for 3D flightpath reconstructions. Bats approached prey from our predicted optimal oblique angles, using the leaf as a specular reflector to uncover previously acoustically hidden prey. Our findings disclose key behavioral and acoustic mechanisms enabling the detection of prey echoes that background clutter would otherwise mask. This work adds to the fundamental understanding of how bat echolocation strategies can override acoustic camouflage by silent, motionless prey, thus providing new insights into the evolutionary arms race between predators and their prey.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Micronycteris microtis; Phyllostomidae; acoustic masking; active gleaning; bats; clutter echoes; echolocation; foraging strategies; prey approach; specular effect

Year:  2019        PMID: 31378617     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  6 in total

1.  Predation risks of signalling and searching: bats prefer moving katydids.

Authors:  Inga Geipel; Ciara E Kernan; Amber S Litterer; Gerald G Carter; Rachel A Page; Hannah M Ter Hofstede
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Ear pinnae in a neotropical katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) function as ultrasound guides for bat detection.

Authors:  Christian A Pulver; Emine Celiker; Charlie Woodrow; Inga Geipel; Carl D Soulsbury; Darron A Cullen; Stephen M Rogers; Daniel Veitch; Fernando Montealegre-Z
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Hearing sensitivity: An underlying mechanism for niche differentiation in gleaning bats.

Authors:  Inga Geipel; Ella Z Lattenkamp; M May Dixon; Lutz Wiegrebe; Rachel A Page
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Finding a signal hidden among noise: how can predators overcome camouflage strategies?

Authors:  James A M Galloway; Samuel D Green; Martin Stevens; Laura A Kelley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Aquatic Insects Transfer Pharmaceuticals and Endocrine Disruptors from Aquatic to Terrestrial Ecosystems.

Authors:  Ana Previšić; Marina Vilenica; Natalija Vučković; Mira Petrović; Marko Rožman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Bio-acoustic tracking and localization using heterogeneous, scalable microphone arrays.

Authors:  Erik Verreycken; Ralph Simon; Brandt Quirk-Royal; Walter Daems; Jesse Barber; Jan Steckel
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-11-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.