Literature DB >> 34394739

Radiographic and clinical outcomes of second generation Trabecular Metal™ glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Raymond E Chen1, Alexander M Brown1, Alexander S Greenstein1, Sandeep Mannava1, Ilya Voloshin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty with second generation porous tantalum glenoid implants (Trabecular Metal™) has shown good short-term outcomes, but mid-term outcomes are unknown. This study describes the clinical, radiographic, and patient-rated mid-term outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing cemented Trabecular Metal™ glenoid components.
METHODS: Patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with cemented Trabecular Metal™ glenoid components for primary osteoarthritis were identified for minimum five-year follow-up. The primary outcome measure was implant survival; secondary outcome measures included patient-rated outcome scores, shoulder range of motion findings, and radiographic analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-one patients had full radiographic follow-up. Mean follow-up was 6.6 years. There was 100% implant survival. Shoulder range of motion significantly improved and the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Society score was 89.8. There was presence of metal debris radiographically in 24% of patients. Twenty-nine percent of patients had evidence of radiolucency. Fourteen percent of patients had moderate superior subluxation.
CONCLUSION: Total shoulder arthroplasty with second generation cemented Trabecular Metal™ glenoid components yielded good outcomes at mean 6.6-year follow-up. Metal debris incidence and clinical outcomes were similar to short-term findings. The presence of metal debris did not significantly affect clinical outcomes. Continued observation of these patients will elucidate longer-term implant survival.
© 2020 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trabecular Metal™ glenoid; glenoid component; metal debris; metal-backed glenoid; total shoulder arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 34394739      PMCID: PMC8355655          DOI: 10.1177/1758573220909981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  27 in total

1.  Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Cyril Avidor; Sumant G Krishnan; Gilles Walch; Jean-François Kempf; Daniel Molé
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Mid-term results of a metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  A Castagna; M Randelli; R Garofalo; L Maradei; A Giardella; M Borroni
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-10

Review 3.  Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-01

4.  Fixation of a trabecular metal knee arthroplasty component. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  M J Dunbar; D A J Wilson; A W Hennigar; J D Amirault; M Gross; G P Reardon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores predict postoperative outcome in total shoulder arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Raymond E Chen; M Owen Papuga; Gregg T Nicandri; Richard J Miller; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  A biomechanical analysis of initial fixation options for porous-tantalum-backed glenoid components.

Authors:  Matthew D Budge; Michael D Kurdziel; Kevin C Baker; J Michael Wiater
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Secondary rotator cuff dysfunction following total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study with more than five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Allan A Young; Gilles Walch; Guido Pape; Frank Gohlke; Luc Favard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Clinical and radiologic outcomes of the second-generation Trabecular Metal™ glenoid for total shoulder replacements after 2-6 years follow-up.

Authors:  Juan Paulo Panti; Simon Tan; Warren Kuo; Sebastian Fung; Kim Walker; Jed Duff
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Total shoulder arthroplasty with a second-generation tantalum trabecular metal-backed glenoid component: Clinical and radiographic outcomes at a mean follow-up of 38 months.

Authors:  G Merolla; P Chin; T M Sasyniuk; P Paladini; G Porcellini
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Mary L McHugh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.