Literature DB >> 26733518

Total shoulder arthroplasty with a second-generation tantalum trabecular metal-backed glenoid component: Clinical and radiographic outcomes at a mean follow-up of 38 months.

G Merolla1, P Chin2, T M Sasyniuk2, P Paladini1, G Porcellini1.   

Abstract

AIMS: We evaluated clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) using the second-generation Trabecular Metal (TM) Glenoid component. The first generation component was withdrawn in 2005 after a series of failures were reported. Between 2009 and 2012, 40 consecutive patients with unilateral TSA using the second-generation component were enrolled in this clinical study. The mean age of the patients was 63.8 years (40 to 75) and the mean follow-up was 38 months (24 to 42).
METHODS: Patients were evaluated using the Constant score (CS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and routine radiographs.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the pre- and post-operative CS (p = 0.003), ASES (p = 0.009) scores and CS subscores of pain (p < 0.001), strength (p < 0.001) and mobility items (p < 0.05). No glenoid or humeral components migrated. Posterior thinning of the keel and slight wear at the polyethylene-TM interface was observed in one patient but was asymptomatic. Radiolucent lines were found around three humeral (< 1.5 mm) and two glenoid components (< 1 mm) and all were asymptomatic. DISCUSSION: TSA with the second-generation TM Glenoid component results in satisfactory to excellent clinical performance, function, and subjective satisfaction at a mean follow-up of about three years. Radiographic changes were few and did not affect the outcome. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: This paper highlights that the second generation Trabecular Metal Glenoid has better outcomes than those reported with the first-generation component. ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; glenoid; shoulder osteoarthritis; trabecular metal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26733518     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  12 in total

Review 1.  Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-01

2.  Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: all-polyethylene versus metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  M O Gauci; N Bonnevialle; G Moineau; M Baba; G Walch; P Boileau
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Radiographic and clinical outcomes of second generation Trabecular Metal™ glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Raymond E Chen; Alexander M Brown; Alexander S Greenstein; Sandeep Mannava; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-03-24

Review 4.  Do Modern Designs of Metal-Backed Glenoid Components Show Improved Clinical Results in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; Fahad Alabdullatif; Mohammed Aldeghaither; Myung Jin Shin; Hyojune Kim; Dongjun Park; Erica Kholinne; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung Hwan Koh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-28

5.  Total shoulder replacement using a bone ingrowth central peg polyethylene glenoid component: a prospective clinical and computed tomography study with short- to mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Giovanni Ciaramella; Elisabetta Fabbri; Gilles Walch; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: What is the evidence? A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Dimitrios Chytas; Lazaros Kostretzis; Angelos Trellopoulos; Emmanouil Brilakis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-09-25

Review 7.  A comparison of pegged vs. keeled glenoid components regarding functional and radiographic outcomes in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arthur Welsher; Chetan Gohal; Kim Madden; Bruce Miller; Asheesh Bedi; Bashar Alolabi; Moin Khan
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-07-11

Review 8.  The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Shu-Ting Pan; Jia-Xuan Qiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Loosening and revision rates after total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid and three modern designs of metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; Mohammed Aldeghaither; Fahad Alabdullatif; Myung Jin Shin; Erica Kholinne; Hyojune Kim; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung-Hwan Koh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Does Having a Rotator Cuff Repair Before Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Influence Outcomes?

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Daphne Ling; Alexandra Wong; Joshua S Dines; David M Dines; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.