| Literature DB >> 34367289 |
Pooja D Khandagale1, Prashant P Shetty2, Saleem D Makandar3, Pradeep A Bapna2, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari3,4, Anand Marya5, Pietro Messina6, Giuseppe Alessandro Scardina6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The main aims of root canal instrumentation are to provide an environment that will lead to healing and to provide a root canal shape that is comfortable to clean and seal. When working with rotary endodontic instruments, the most significant concerns are that the instrument might fracture in the root canal, thus affecting the treatment outcome. Hence, it is of immense importance to know which file systems have more cyclic fatigue resistance. Methodology. This study evaluated the effect of the curved segment length of the artificial canal (the arch), and the number of cycles necessary in fracture of Hyflex EDM, Twisted files, and ProTaper Gold were recorded. Sixty NiTi rotary instruments of 25 mm length (Hyflex EDM (20), Twisted files (20), and ProTaper Gold (20)) were tested in a metal block with simulated canal having 90° angle of curvature. The study was performed with a specific radius and degree of curvature, i.e., 8 mm radius and 90⁰ angle of curvature, and data obtained were subsequently subjected to statistical evaluation using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test. RESULT: The Hyflex EDM (774.29) exhibited the maximum cyclic fatigue resistance compared to Twisted files (654.875) and ProTaper Gold (375.575). A statistically significant difference was observed between the tested groups.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34367289 PMCID: PMC8346304 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7402658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Figure 1Custom-made metal block simulating curved canal with a degree of curvature 90°.
Figure 2Rotary files instrumented in the simulated curved canals until fracture.
Comparison of no. of cycles required for fracture among study groups using the one-way ANOVA test.
| Groups |
| Mean | Std. deviation | 95% confidence interval for mean |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||
| Hyflex EDM files | 20 | 774.29 | 64.17 | 744.26 | 804.32 | 0.001 |
| Twisted files | 20 | 654.875 | 85.33 | 614.94 | 694.81 | |
| ProTaper Gold | 20 | 375.575 | 19.84 | 366.29 | 384.86 | |
Pairwise comparison of no. of cycles required for fracture using Tukey's post hoc test.
| Groups | Comparison group | Difference |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyflex EDM files | Twisted files | 119.415 | 0.001 |
| Hyflex EDM files | ProTaper Gold files | 398.715 | 0.001 |
| Twisted files | ProTaper Gold files | 279.300 | 0.001 |
Figure 3Mean number of cycles required for fracture.