| Literature DB >> 34356827 |
Geting Ye1, Cuiying Huang1, Jialin Li1, Tao Chen1, Jing Tang1, Wenbin Liu1, Yuhua Long1.
Abstract
Six new DIKETOPIPERAZINE alkaloids aspergiamides A-F (1-6), together with ten known alkaloids (7-16), were isolated from the mangrove endophytic fungus Aspergillus sp. 16-5c. The structures of the new compounds were elucidated based on 1D/2D NMR spectroscopic and HR-ESIMS data analyses. The absolute configurations of aspergiamides A-F were established based on the experimental and calculated ECD data. All the compounds were evaluated for the antidiabetic activity against α-glucosidase and PTP1B enzyme. The bioassay results disclosed compounds 1 and 9 exhibited significant α-glucosidase inhibitory with IC50 values of 18.2 and 7.6 μM, respectively; compounds 3, 10, 11, and 15 exhibited moderate α-glucosidase inhibition with IC50 values ranging from 40.7 to 83.9 μM; while no compounds showed obvious PTP1B enzyme inhibition activity.Entities:
Keywords: PTP1B inhibition; antidiabetic activity; diketopiperazine alkaloids; mangrove fungi; α-glucosidase inhibition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34356827 PMCID: PMC8304462 DOI: 10.3390/md19070402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Chemical structures of compounds 1–16.
1H (600 MHz) and 13C NMR (150 MHz) data for compounds 1–3.
| Position | 1 a | 2 a | 3 a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC | δH (J/Hz) | δC | δH (J/Hz) | δC | δH (J/Hz) | |
| 2 | 146.2, C | 146.2, C | 146.2, C | |||
| 3 | 104.3, C | 104.3, C | 104.6, C | |||
| 3a | 127.1, C | 127.3, C | 126.0, C | |||
| 4 | 119.9, CH | 7.24, d (7.9) | 120.0, CH | 7.26, d (7.8) | 112.5, CH | 7.41, d (8.0) |
| 5 | 121.2, CH | 7.08, m | 121.2, CH | 7.08, m | 122.4, CH | 7.12, m |
| 6 | 122.5, CH | 7.13, m | 122.7, CH | 7.13, m | 121.1, CH | 7.07, m |
| 7 | 112.6, CH | 7.43, d (8.0) | 112.6, CH | 7.42, d (8.0) | 120.2, CH | 7.31, d (7.9) |
| 7a | 136.8, C | 136.9, C | 136.7, C | |||
| 8 | 114.5, CH | 7.22, s | 114.7, CH | 7.22, s | 114.6, CH | 7.23, s |
| 9 | 124.6, C | 124.5, C | 127.3, C | |||
| 10 | 162.5, C | 162.5, C | 160.9, C | |||
| 12 | 56.8, CH | 4.21, t (5.4) | 56.1, CH | 4.25, t (5.6) | 58.7, CH | 4.72, dd |
| 13 | 168.1, C | 167.5, C | 168.2, C | |||
| 15 | 40.5, C | 40.5, C | 40.5, C | |||
| 15a | 28.1, CH3 | 1.55, s | 28.1, CH3 | 1.55, s | 28.0, CH3 | 1.56, s |
| 15b | 28.3, CH3 | 1.54, s | 28.2, CH3 | 1.54, s | 28.3, CH3 | 1.54, s |
| 16 | 146.0, CH | 6.11, dd | 146.0, CH | 6.11, dd | 146.2, CH | 6.11, dd (17.2,10.8) |
| 17 | 112.7,CH2 | 5.11, m | 112.7, CH2 | 5.11, m | 112.5, CH2 | 5.11, m |
| 18 | 32.6, CH2 | 1.95, m | 31.0, CH2 | 2.21, m | 39.0, CH2 | 2.11, m |
| 2.03, m | 2.34, dd | |||||
| 19 | 28.4, CH2 | 1.67, m | 30.2, CH2 | 2.48, m | 68.6, CH | 4.51, m |
| 1.74, m | ||||||
| 20 | 62.5, CH2 | 3.63, t (6.3) | 176.3, C | 55.6, CH2 | 3.53, d (13.2) | |
| 3.92, dd
| ||||||
a Measured in Methanol-d4.
Figure 2Key HMBC and 1H-1H COSY correlations of 1–6.
Figure 3Comparison between the experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 1 and 3.
Figure 4Key NOESY correlations of 3 and 4.
1H (600 MHz) and 13C NMR (150 MHz) data for compounds 4–6.
| Position | 4 a | 5 b | 6 b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC | δH (J/Hz) | δC | δH (J/Hz) | δC | δH (J/Hz) | |
| 1 | 10.5, s | |||||
| 2 | 140.7, C | 143.6, C | 77.2, CH | 5.71, s | ||
| 3 | 111.1, C | 106.5, C | 151.4, C | |||
| 3a | 127.3, C | 128.7, C | ||||
| 4 | 110.3, CH | 7.30, d (8.0) | 112.4, CH | 7.40, d (8.1) | ||
| 5 | 118.0, CH | 6.86, m | 121.0, CH | 7.03, m | 148.4, C | |
| 6 | 120.2, CH | 6.97, m | 122.3, CH | 7.09, m | 128.2, CH | 7.73, d (8.1) |
| 7 | 121.6, CH | 7.70, d (8.0) | 121.2, CH | 7.74, d (8.0) | 136.0, CH | 7.84, ddd |
| 7a | 135.0, C | 136.6, C | (8.0, 7.0, 1.4) | |||
| 8 | 68.9, CH | 5.30, dd | 77.8, CH | 5.60, d (2.4) | 128.7, CH | 7.56, ddd |
| 9 | 62.7, CH | 4.0, dd | 63.4, CH | 4.39, s | 127.6, CH | 8.14, dd |
| 10 | 164.4, C | 165.8, C | 121.6, C | |||
| 11 | 161.8, C | |||||
| 12 | 58.4, CH | 3.86, dd | 60.1, CH | 4.16, m | ||
| 13 | 169.5, C | 170.6, C | 58.9, CH | 5.37, dd | ||
| 14 | 8.16, d (4.5) | 171.8, C | ||||
| 15 | 38.7, C | 40.1, C | 40.4, CH2 | 3.37, dd | ||
| 3.44, dd | ||||||
| 15a | 28.1, CH3 | 1.46, s | 28.2, CH3 | 1.60, s | ||
| 15b | 28.2, CH3 | 1.44, s | 28.5, CH3 | 1.57, s | ||
| 16 | 146.3, CH | 6.16, dd | 146.9, CH | 6.16, dd | 128.4, C | |
| 17 | 110.7, CH2 | 5.09, m | 112.6, CH2 | 5.18, ddd (17.5,10.5,0.8) | 131.7, CH | 7.06, d (8.4) |
| 18 | 28.8, CH2 | 2.09, m | 30.0, CH2 | 1.95, m | 116.1, CH | 6.64, d (8.4) |
| 1.73, m | 2.34, dd | |||||
| 19 | 21.9, CH2 | 1.83, m | 22.9, CH2 | 1.95, m | 157.6, C | |
| 2.06, m | ||||||
| 20 | 45.3, CH2 | 3.26, m | 46.1, CH2 | 3.47, m | 116.1, CH | 6.64, d (8.4) |
| 3.40, m | 3.76, m | |||||
| 21 | 131.7, CH | 7.06, d (8.4) | ||||
| 8-OH | 5.33, d (3.5) | |||||
| 8-OCH3 | 56.9, CH3 | 3.17, s | ||||
a Measured in DMSO-d6. b Measured in Methanol-d4.
Figure 5Comparison between the experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 4.
Figure 6Comparison between the experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 5.
Figure 7Comparison between the experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 6.
Inhibitory potency of DPKs to α-glucosidase and PTP1B.
| Compd. | α-glucosidase
| PTP1B (Inhibition Ratio/%) a | Compd. | α-glucosidase | PTP1B (Inhibition Ratio/%) a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18.2 | 29 |
| 40.7 | <10 |
|
| 130.7 | <10 |
| 37.5 | <10 |
|
| 83.9 | <10 |
| 1086.6 | <10 |
|
| 144.2 | <10 |
| 480.5 | <10 |
|
| 1093.5 | <10 |
| 353.2 | <10 |
|
| 267.3 | <10 |
| 67.8 | <10 |
|
| 198.2 | <10 |
| 362.6 | <10 |
|
| 364.3 | <10 | Acarbose b | 408.0 | - |
|
| 7.6 | <10 | Oleanolic acid c | - | 99.1 |
a The inhibition ratio screening concentration was 100 μg/mL for the PTP1B test; b Acarbose was used as a positive control for the α-glucosidase inhibitory test; c Oleanolic acid was used as a positive control for PTP1B inhibitory test.