Literature DB >> 34344177

Adaptive shifts underlie the divergence in wing morphology in bombycoid moths.

Brett R Aiello1,2,3, Milton Tan4, Usama Bin Sikandar5,6, Alexis J Alvey4, Burhanuddin Bhinderwala1, Katalina C Kimball2, Jesse R Barber7, Chris A Hamilton8, Akito Y Kawahara3,9,10, Simon Sponberg1,2.   

Abstract

The evolution of flapping flight is linked to the prolific success of insects. Across Insecta, wing morphology diversified, strongly impacting aerodynamic performance. In the presence of ecological opportunity, discrete adaptive shifts and early bursts are two processes hypothesized to give rise to exceptional morphological diversification. Here, we use the sister-families Sphingidae and Saturniidae to answer how the evolution of aerodynamically important traits is linked to clade divergence and through what process(es) these traits evolve. Many agile Sphingidae evolved hover feeding behaviours, while adult Saturniidae lack functional mouth parts and rely on a fixed energy budget as adults. We find that Sphingidae underwent an adaptive shift in wing morphology coincident with life history and behaviour divergence, evolving small high aspect ratio wings advantageous for power reduction that can be moved at high frequencies, beneficial for flight control. By contrast, Saturniidae, which do not feed as adults, evolved large wings and morphology which surprisingly does not reduce aerodynamic power, but could contribute to their erratic flight behaviour, aiding in predator avoidance. We suggest that after the evolution of flapping flight, diversification of wing morphology can be potentiated by adaptative shifts, shaping the diversity of wing morphology across insects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution; flight; moth; wing shape

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34344177      PMCID: PMC8334871          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  32 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive radiation: contrasting theory with data.

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets; Jonathan B Losos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Size-correction and principal components for interspecific comparative studies.

Authors:  Liam J Revell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Cruising the rain forest floor: butterfly wing shape evolution and gliding in ground effect.

Authors:  Ann Cespedes; Carla M Penz; Philip J DeVries
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Flies compensate for unilateral wing damage through modular adjustments of wing and body kinematics.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; Nicole A Iwasaki; Michael J Elzinga; Johan M Melis; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Testing for ancient adaptive radiations in neotropical cichlid fishes.

Authors:  Hernán López-Fernández; Jessica H Arbour; Kirk O Winemiller; Rodney L Honeycutt
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Morphology, muscle capacity, skill, and maneuvering ability in hummingbirds.

Authors:  Roslyn Dakin; Paolo S Segre; Andrew D Straw; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation.

Authors:  A P Willmott; C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Kinematic, aerodynamic and anatomical mechanisms in the slow, maneuvering flight of pigeons

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Turning flight of bats.

Authors:  H D Aldridge
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Decomposing the Apoptosis Pathway Into Biologically Interpretable Principal Components.

Authors:  Min Wang; Steven M Kornblau; Kevin R Coombes
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-05-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight.

Authors:  Brett R Aiello; Usama Bin Sikandar; Hajime Minoguchi; Burhanuddin Bhinderwala; Chris A Hamilton; Akito Y Kawahara; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  A nondestructive method of calculating the wing area of insects.

Authors:  Kexin Yu; Gadi V P Reddy; Julian Schrader; Xuchen Guo; Yirong Li; Yabing Jiao; Peijian Shi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.