Literature DB >> 34847789

The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight.

Brett R Aiello1,2,3, Usama Bin Sikandar4,5, Hajime Minoguchi1, Burhanuddin Bhinderwala1, Chris A Hamilton6, Akito Y Kawahara3,7,8, Simon Sponberg1,2.   

Abstract

Across insects, wing shape and size have undergone dramatic divergence even in closely related sister groups. However, we do not know how morphology changes in tandem with kinematics to support body weight within available power and how the specific force production patterns are linked to differences in behaviour. Hawkmoths and wild silkmoths are diverse sister families with divergent wing morphology. Using three-dimensional kinematics and quasi-steady aerodynamic modelling, we compare the aerodynamics and the contributions of wing shape, size and kinematics in 10 moth species. We find that wing movement also diverges between the clades and underlies two distinct strategies for flight. Hawkmoths use wing kinematics, especially high frequencies, to enhance force and wing morphologies that reduce power. Silkmoths use wing morphology to enhance force, and slow, high-amplitude wingstrokes to reduce power. Both strategies converge on similar aerodynamic power and can support similar body weight ranges. However, inter-clade within-wingstroke force profiles are quite different and linked to the hovering flight of hawkmoths and the bobbing flight of silkmoths. These two moth groups fly more like other, distantly related insects than they do each other, demonstrating the diversity of flapping flight evolution and a rich bioinspired design space for robotic flappers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aerodynamics; flapping flight; insect; morphology; moth; wing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34847789      PMCID: PMC8647679          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  34 in total

1.  Flexural stiffness in insect wings. I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation.

Authors:  S A Combes; T L Daniel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Hovering and forward flight of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: trim search and 6-DOF dynamic stability characterization.

Authors:  Joong-Kwan Kim; Jong-Seob Han; Jun-Seong Lee; Jae-Hung Han
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.956

3.  Asymmetry costs: effects of wing damage on hovering flight performance in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta.

Authors:  María José Fernández; Marion E Driver; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Comparative system identification of flower tracking performance in three hawkmoth species reveals adaptations for dim light vision.

Authors:  Anna L Stöckl; Klara Kihlström; Steven Chandler; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Validation of XMALab software for marker-based XROMM.

Authors:  Benjamin J Knörlein; David B Baier; Stephen M Gatesy; J D Laurence-Chasen; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Indirect actuation reduces flight power requirements in Manduca sexta via elastic energy exchange.

Authors:  Jeff Gau; Nick Gravish; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation.

Authors:  A P Willmott; C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 8.  The aerodynamics and control of free flight manoeuvres in Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael H Dickinson; Florian T Muijres
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight.

Authors:  Sanjay P Sane; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Direct lateral maneuvers in hawkmoths.

Authors:  Jeremy S M Greeter; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.422

View more
  1 in total

1.  The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight.

Authors:  Brett R Aiello; Usama Bin Sikandar; Hajime Minoguchi; Burhanuddin Bhinderwala; Chris A Hamilton; Akito Y Kawahara; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.118

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.