Literature DB >> 9418030

The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation.

A P Willmott1, C P Ellington.   

Abstract

Mean lift coefficients have been calculated for hawkmoth flight at a range of speeds in order to investigate the aerodynamic significance of the kinematic variation which accompanies changes in forward velocity. The coefficients exceed the maximum steady-state value of 0.71 at all except the very fastest speeds, peaking at 2.0 or greater between 1 and 2 ms-1. Unsteady high-lift mechanisms are therefore most important during hovering and slow forward flight. In combination with the wingtip paths relative to the surrounding air, the calculated mean lift coefficients illustrate how the relative contributions of the two halfstrokes to the force balance change with increasing forward speed. Angle of incidence data for fast forward flight suggest that the sense of the circulation is not reversed between the down- and upstrokes, indicating a flight mode qualitatively different from that proposed for lower-speed flight in the hawkmoth and other insects. The mid-downstroke angle of incidence is constant at 30-40 degrees across the speed range. The relationship between power requirements and flight speed is explored; above 5 ms-1, further increases in forward velocity are likely to be constrained by available mechanical power, although problems with thrust generation and flight stability may also be involved. Hawkmoth wing and body morphology, and the differences between males and females, are evaluated in aerodynamic terms. Steady-state force measurements show that the hawkmoth body is amongst the most streamlined for any insect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9418030     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.200.21.2723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  20 in total

1.  How to perform measurements in a hovering animal's wake: physical modelling of the vortex wake of the hawkmoth, Manduca sexta.

Authors:  Eric D Tytell; Charles P Ellington
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The aerodynamic costs of warning signals in palatable mimetic butterflies and their distasteful models.

Authors:  Robert B Srygley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Floquet stability analysis of the longitudinal dynamics of two hovering model insects.

Authors:  Jiang Hao Wu; Mao Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Hindwings are unnecessary for flight but essential for execution of normal evasive flight in Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Benjamin Jantzen; Thomas Eisner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Nonlinear flight dynamics and stability of hovering model insects.

Authors:  Bin Liang; Mao Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The power-speed relationship is U-shaped in two free-flying hawkmoths (Manducasexta).

Authors:  Kajsa Warfvinge; Marco KleinHeerenbrink; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Computational investigation of cicada aerodynamics in forward flight.

Authors:  Hui Wan; Haibo Dong; Kuo Gai
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Indirect actuation reduces flight power requirements in Manduca sexta via elastic energy exchange.

Authors:  Jeff Gau; Nick Gravish; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  The reverse flight of a monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is characterized by a weight-supporting upstroke and postural changes.

Authors:  Ayodeji T Bode-Oke; Haibo Dong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Wide-field motion tuning in nocturnal hawkmoths.

Authors:  Jamie C Theobald; Eric J Warrant; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.