Literature DB >> 28163885

Flies compensate for unilateral wing damage through modular adjustments of wing and body kinematics.

Florian T Muijres1, Nicole A Iwasaki2, Michael J Elzinga2, Johan M Melis3, Michael H Dickinson4.   

Abstract

Using high-speed videography, we investigated how fruit flies compensate for unilateral wing damage, in which loss of area on one wing compromises both weight support and roll torque equilibrium. Our results show that flies control for unilateral damage by rolling their body towards the damaged wing and by adjusting the kinematics of both the intact and damaged wings. To compensate for the reduction in vertical lift force due to damage, flies elevate wingbeat frequency. Because this rise in frequency increases the flapping velocity of both wings, it has the undesired consequence of further increasing roll torque. To compensate for this effect, flies increase the stroke amplitude and advance the timing of pronation and supination of the damaged wing, while making the opposite adjustments on the intact wing. The resulting increase in force on the damaged wing and decrease in force on the intact wing function to maintain zero net roll torque. However, the bilaterally asymmetrical pattern of wing motion generates a finite lateral force, which flies balance by maintaining a constant body roll angle. Based on these results and additional experiments using a dynamically scaled robotic fly, we propose a simple bioinspired control algorithm for asymmetric wing damage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; aerodynamics; biomechanics; flapping flight; flight control

Year:  2017        PMID: 28163885      PMCID: PMC5206612          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  27 in total

1.  Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight.

Authors:  M H Dickinson; F O Lehmann; S P Sane
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A comparison of visual and haltere-mediated equilibrium reflexes in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alana Sherman; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Neuromuscular and biomechanical compensation for wing asymmetry in insect hovering flight.

Authors:  María José Fernández; Dwight Springthorpe; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Dynamics of animal movement in an ecological context: dragonfly wing damage reduces flight performance and predation success.

Authors:  S A Combes; J D Crall; S Mukherjee
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Fruit flies modulate passive wing pitching to generate in-flight turns.

Authors:  Attila J Bergou; Leif Ristroph; John Guckenheimer; Itai Cohen; Z Jane Wang
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  A linear systems analysis of the yaw dynamics of a dynamically scaled insect model.

Authors:  William B Dickson; Peter Polidoro; Melissa M Tanner; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Role of calcium in the regulation of mechanical power in insect flight.

Authors:  Shefa Gordon; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Neuromuscular control of aerodynamic forces and moments in the blowfly, Calliphora vicina.

Authors:  Claire N Balint; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Wing and body motion during flight initiation in Drosophila revealed by automated visual tracking.

Authors:  Ebraheem I Fontaine; Francisco Zabala; Michael H Dickinson; Joel W Burdick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight.

Authors:  Sanjay P Sane; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  6 in total

1.  The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight.

Authors:  Brett R Aiello; Usama Bin Sikandar; Hajime Minoguchi; Burhanuddin Bhinderwala; Chris A Hamilton; Akito Y Kawahara; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Distinct forms of resonant optimality within insect indirect flight motors.

Authors:  Arion Pons; Tsevi Beatus
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  Adaptive shifts underlie the divergence in wing morphology in bombycoid moths.

Authors:  Brett R Aiello; Milton Tan; Usama Bin Sikandar; Alexis J Alvey; Burhanuddin Bhinderwala; Katalina C Kimball; Jesse R Barber; Chris A Hamilton; Akito Y Kawahara; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  A population of descending neurons that regulates the flight motor of Drosophila.

Authors:  Shigehiro Namiki; Ivo G Ros; Carmen Morrow; William J Rowell; Gwyneth M Card; Wyatt Korff; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 10.900

5.  Wings and halteres act as coupled dual oscillators in flies.

Authors:  Tanvi Deora; Siddharth S Sane; Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Effects of clipping of flight feathers on resource use in Gallus gallus domesticus.

Authors:  Renée Garant; Bret W Tobalske; Neila BenSassi; Nienke van Staaveren; Dan Tulpan; Tina Widowski; Donald R Powers; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.