| Literature DB >> 34316209 |
Surya Agus Prihatno1, Yosua Kristian Adi1, Teguh Budipitojo2, Topas Wicaksono Priyo1, Yonathan Alvin Maruli Asi Sihotang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: In the male reproductive system, the aging process can lead to infertility. Recently, placenta and its derivatives have been researched as regenerative agents. This study aimed to describe the basic components of dried bovine placenta powder and its potential effects as a regenerative agent in a rat model of male reproductive aging with D-galactose induction.Entities:
Keywords: aging; bovine placenta; male reproductive; sperm count; testicular
Year: 2021 PMID: 34316209 PMCID: PMC8304429 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.1602-1607
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Contents nutrient analysis of dried bovine placenta powder.
| Samples | Content of dried bovine placenta powder | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water (%) | Ash (%) | Fat (%) | Protein (%) | Carbohydrates (by different %) | |
| Bovine placenta powder 1 | 8.21 (8.25) | 5.57 (5.86) | 3.32 (2.79) | 62.94 (63.84) | 19.96 (19.26) |
| Bovine placenta powder 2 | 9.05 (8.79) | 4.14 (4.16) | 3.43 (3.53) | 61.49 (59.65) | 21.89 (23.87) |
| Average | 8.58±0.41 | 4.93±0.91 | 3.27±0.33 | 61.98±1.83 | 21.25±2.07 |
The number of spermatozoa from the caudal epididymis.
| Rat number | Spermatozoa count (106/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | Group C | |
| Rat 1 | 3466 | 1266 | 2266 |
| Rat 2 | 3200 | 1200 | 3266 |
| Rat 3 | 2600 | 1532 | 2666 |
| Rat 4 | 2932 | 2000 | - |
| Rat 5 | 2932 | 1466 | 2732 |
| Average | 3026±25 | 2732.5±411 | |
p<0.05
Testicle weight of rats in Group A, Group B, and Group C.
| Rat number | Testicle weight (g) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | Group C | ||||
| Left testis | Right testis | Left testis | Right testis | Left testis | Right testis | |
| Rat 1 | 1.20 | 1.28 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.46 | 1.40 |
| Rat 2 | 1.36 | 1.42 | 1.50 | 1.46 | 1.34 | 1.34 |
| Rat 3 | 0.98 | 1.06 | 1.24 | 1.24 | 1.22 | 1.22 |
| Rat 4 | 1.10 | 1.04 | 1.40 | 1.38 | - | - |
| Rat 5 | 1.40 | 1.36 | 1.30 | 1.28 | 1.18 | 1.10 |
| Average | 1.21± 0.18 | 1.23± 0.17 | 1.37± 0.10 | 1.35± 0.09 | 1.30± 0.13 | 1.27± 0.13 |
| Total | 2.44±0.31 | 2.72±0.17 | 2.57±0.22 | |||
Testicle volume of rats in Group A, Group B, and Group C.
| Rat number | Testicle volume (cm3) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | Group C | ||||
| Left testis | Right testis | Left testis | Right testis | Left testis | Right testis | |
| Rat 1 | 1.25 | 1.08 | 1.26 | 1.31 | 1.28 | 1.35 |
| Rat 2 | 1.30 | 1.24 | 1.33 | 1.31 | 1.18 | 1.11 |
| Rat 3 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.17 | 1.13 | 1.12 | 1.14 |
| Rat 4 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.24 | 1.29 | - | - |
| Rat 5 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.23 | 1.19 | 1.09 | 1.04 |
| Average | 1.16± 0.15 | 1.12± 0.12 | 1.25± 0.06 | 1.25± 0.08 | 1.17± 0.08 | 1.16± 0.13 |
| Total | 2.29±0.23 | 2.49±0.12 | 2.33±0.18 | |||
Figure-1Concentration of spermatozoa from cauda epididymal semen of rats in Group A, Group B, and Group C. Statistical analysis showed significant difference (*) with p<0.05.
Figure-2Average of testicle weight of rats in Group A, Group B, and Group C. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference.
Figure-3Average of testicle volume of rats in Group A, Group B, and Group C. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference.