Literature DB >> 18574782

The choice of distracting task can affect the quality of auditory evoked potentials recorded for clinical assessment.

Brigitte A Lavoie1, Jemma E Hine, Roger D Thornton.   

Abstract

Auditory evoked potential (AEP) recordings often require subjects to ignore the stimuli and stay awake. In the present experiment, early (ABR), middle (MLR), and late latency (LLR) AEPs were recorded to compare the effect of five different distracting tasks: (1) doing nothing eyes open, (2) reading, (3) watching a movie, (4) solving a three-digit sum, and (5) doing nothing eyes closed (or counting the stimuli for LLR). Results showed that neither the amplitudes nor the latencies of the ABR, MLR, or LLR were affected by task. However, the amount of pre-stimulus activity (noise) or amplitude rejection was significantly and differently affected by the distracting task. For the ABR, the math task was the noisiest but, for the MLR, the amount of noise was greater when watching a movie. As for the LLR, reading and watching a movie yielded the lowest percentage of rejected traces. In conclusion, the choice of distracting task depends on the AEP being measured and should be chosen to improve the quality of the AEP traces and thus reduce recording time.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18574782     DOI: 10.1080/14992020802033109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  5 in total

1.  Effects of background noise on cortical encoding of speech in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Steven Zecker; Barbara Trommer; Julia Chen; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2009-04-08

2.  Large group differences in binaural sensitivity are represented in preattentive responses from auditory cortex.

Authors:  Angkana Lertpoompunya; Erol J Ozmeral; Nathan C Higgins; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Selective auditory attention modulates cortical responses to sound location change in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.974

4.  Musical rhythms and their influence on P300 velocity in young females.

Authors:  Cintia Ishii de Sá; Liliane Desguado Pereira
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr

5.  A Pilot Study on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Children: Aided CAEPs Reflect Improved High-Frequency Audibility with Frequency Compression Hearing Aid Technology.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Vijayalakshmi Easwar; David W Purcell; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.