Literature DB >> 34272512

What can visual electrophysiology tell about possible visual-field defects in paediatric patients.

Siân E Handley1,2, Maja Šuštar3, Manca Tekavčič Pompe3.   

Abstract

Recognising a potential visual-field (VF) defect in paediatric patients might be challenging, especially in children before the age of 5 years and those with developmental delay or intellectual disability. Visual electrophysiological testing is an objective and non-invasive technique for evaluation of visual function in paediatric patients, which can characterise the location of dysfunction and differentiate between disorders of the retina, optic nerve and visual pathway. The recording of electroretinography (ERG) and visual-evoked potentials (VEP) is possible from early days of life and requires no subjective input from the patient. As the origins of ERG and VEP tests are known, the pattern of electrophysiological changes can provide information about the VF of a child unable to perform accurate perimetry. This review summarises previously published electrophysiological findings in several common types of VF defects that can be found in paediatric patients (generalised VF defect, peripheral VF loss, central scotoma, bi-temporal hemianopia, altitudinal VF defect, quadrantanopia and homonymous hemianopia). It also shares experience on using electrophysiological testing as additional functional evidence to other tests in the clinical challenge of diagnosing or excluding VF defects in complex paediatric patients. Each type of VF defect is illustrated with one or two clinical cases.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34272512     DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01680-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  92 in total

1.  Effectiveness of testing visual fields by confrontation.

Authors:  R J Pandit; K Gales; P G Griffiths
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The time course of retrograde trans-synaptic degeneration following occipital lobe damage in humans.

Authors:  Panitha Jindahra; Aviva Petrie; Gordon T Plant
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography (PERG): 2012 update.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Mitchell G Brigell; Marko Hawlina; Graham E Holder; Mary A Johnson; Daphne L McCulloch; Thomas Meigen; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials: (2016 update).

Authors:  J Vernon Odom; Michael Bach; Mitchell Brigell; Graham E Holder; Daphne L McCulloch; Atsushi Mizota; Alma Patrizia Tormene
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  A new perimeter using the preferential looking response to assess peripheral visual fields in young and developmentally delayed children.

Authors:  Louise E Allen; Michael E Slater; Ruth V Proffitt; Elizabeth Quarton; Adar Pelah
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Estimating Lead Time Gained by Optical Coherence Tomography in Detecting Glaucoma before Development of Visual Field Defects.

Authors:  Tammy M Kuang; Chunwei Zhang; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Developmental outcome, including setback, in young children with severe visual impairment.

Authors:  Naomi Dale; Patricia Sonksen
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.449

8.  Saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry in children with neurodisability or isolated visual pathway lesions: observational cohort study.

Authors:  Vijay Tailor; Selina Glaze; Hilary Unwin; Richard Bowman; Graham Thompson; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  ISCEV Standard for clinical electro-oculography (2017 update).

Authors:  Paul A Constable; Michael Bach; Laura J Frishman; Brett G Jeffrey; Anthony G Robson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Detection and characterisation of visual field defects using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry in children with brain tumours.

Authors:  Ian C Murray; Conrad Schmoll; Antonios Perperidis; Harry M Brash; Alice D McTrusty; Lorraine A Cameron; Alastair G Wilkinson; Alan O Mulvihill; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.