Michael-Alexander Malahias1,2, Fabio Mancino3,4, Amil Agarwal5, Leonidas Roumeliotis6, Alex Gu1, Ioannis Gkiatas1, Danilo Togninalli2, Vasileios S Nikolaou7, Michael M Alexiades8. 1. The Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA. 2. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Clinica ARS Medica, Via Grumo 16, 6929, Gravesano, Ticino, Switzerland. 3. Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head- Neck Studies, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. 4. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2300 M St NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA. 6. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK. 7. 2nd Orthopaedic Department, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece. 8. Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes of cemented femoral stems revisions using the cement-in-cement technique in aseptic conditions after total hip arthroplasty have been widely described. METHODS: The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried. RESULTS: Twelve articles were included (620 revision THA). Revision rate for complications related to the femoral side was 1.4% at mid-term follow-up (5.4 years). Periprosthetic femoral fracture rate was 1.1%, aseptic loosening of the femoral component 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Cement-in-cement revision technique of the femoral component is associated with a high mid-term success rates (98.6%) and is potentially less challenging than other revision techniques.
BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes of cemented femoral stems revisions using the cement-in-cement technique in aseptic conditions after total hip arthroplasty have been widely described. METHODS: The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried. RESULTS: Twelve articles were included (620 revision THA). Revision rate for complications related to the femoral side was 1.4% at mid-term follow-up (5.4 years). Periprosthetic femoral fracture rate was 1.1%, aseptic loosening of the femoral component 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Cement-in-cement revision technique of the femoral component is associated with a high mid-term success rates (98.6%) and is potentially less challenging than other revision techniques.
Authors: Natalija S Stefanovich-Lawbuary; Michael C Parry; Michael R Whitehouse; Ashley W Blom Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Sanjeev Patil; Donald S Garbuz; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2007-10-23 Impact factor: 4.757