| Literature DB >> 35802156 |
Sebastian Hardt1, Lukas Schönnagel2, Christian Hipfl2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PLANNING: Femoral revision represents a challenging procedure in its surgical planning and technical execution. The results are mainly dependent on the bone loss present, the quality of the implant removal and the choice of revision system. Patient-specific factors such as age, comorbidities, bone quality or even the localization of the cement have a decisive influence on the surgical strategy. Appropriate preoperative preparation, including the presence of the necessary special instruments, which are essential for gentle implant removal, is indispensable to achieve the best possible result. THERAPY: A bone-sparing implant removal can be particularly challenging, especially in the case of well-fixed stems and cement residues, which may extend far beyond the isthmus. In such situations, a transfemoral approach should be considered. Cementless reimplantation using modular or non-modular titanium stems is currently the preferred treatment of choice for most revisions. In elderly, low-demand patients or with poor bone quality, cemented revision remains a good alternative treatment option.Entities:
Keywords: Hip revision surgery; Osteotomy; Prosthesis loosening; Stem revision; Total hip replacement
Year: 2022 PMID: 35802156 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-022-04277-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthopadie (Heidelb) ISSN: 2731-7145