Literature DB >> 35802156

[Strategies for stem revision : Surgery planning, implant removal and reimplantation].

Sebastian Hardt1, Lukas Schönnagel2, Christian Hipfl2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PLANNING: Femoral revision represents a challenging procedure in its surgical planning and technical execution. The results are mainly dependent on the bone loss present, the quality of the implant removal and the choice of revision system. Patient-specific factors such as age, comorbidities, bone quality or even the localization of the cement have a decisive influence on the surgical strategy. Appropriate preoperative preparation, including the presence of the necessary special instruments, which are essential for gentle implant removal, is indispensable to achieve the best possible result. THERAPY: A bone-sparing implant removal can be particularly challenging, especially in the case of well-fixed stems and cement residues, which may extend far beyond the isthmus. In such situations, a transfemoral approach should be considered. Cementless reimplantation using modular or non-modular titanium stems is currently the preferred treatment of choice for most revisions. In elderly, low-demand patients or with poor bone quality, cemented revision remains a good alternative treatment option.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip revision surgery; Osteotomy; Prosthesis loosening; Stem revision; Total hip replacement

Year:  2022        PMID: 35802156     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-022-04277-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)        ISSN: 2731-7145


  57 in total

1.  Revision for recurrent instability: what are the predictors of failure?

Authors:  Aaron H Carter; Eoin C Sheehan; S M Javad Mortazavi; James J Purtill; Peter F Sharkey; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Umberto Cottino; Dirk R Larson; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Luca Cavagnaro; Matteo Formica; Marco Basso; Andrea Zanirato; Stefano Divano; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-01

4.  Severe Obesity Increases Risk of Infection After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joris Bongers; Katrijn Smulders; Marc W Nijhof
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  P H J Cnudde; J Kärrholm; O Rolfson; A J Timperley; M Mohaddes
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  What is the Impact of Smoking on Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Nicholas A Bedard; S Blake Dowdle; Jessell M Owens; Kyle R Duchman; Yubo Gao; John J Callaghan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  A Comparison of Risk of Dislocation and Cause-Specific Revision Between Direct Anterior and Posterior Approach Following Elective Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark Charney; Elizabeth W Paxton; Ronald Stradiotto; John J Lee; Adrian D Hinman; Dhiren S Sheth; Heather A Prentice
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Contemporary Outcomes of 612 Hips.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Cody C Wyles; Anthony Viste; Kevin I Perry; Robert T Trousdale; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Quality of life following proximal femoral replacement using a modular system in revision THA.

Authors:  Muhyeddine M Al-Taki; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience.

Authors:  M P Abdel; M T Houdek; C D Watts; D G Lewallen; D J Berry
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.