Literature DB >> 17920472

Cement-within-cement stem exchange using the collarless polished double-taper stem.

Daniel G Mandziak1, Donald W Howie, Susan D Neale, Margaret A McGee.   

Abstract

The clinical and radiographic outcomes of the cement-within-cement femoral stem exchange technique at revision hip arthroplasty were determined. Twenty-three revisions with a collarless polished double-taper stem design were prospectively monitored at up to 12 years. The most common indications for revision were recurrent dislocation and acetabular revision. Radiographic stem subsidence was measured by the Ein Bild Röentgen Analyse method. There was no stem re-revision and no radiographic loosening. Stem within cement subsidence, an intentional design feature of this stem, averaged 0.8 mm (range, 0-2 mm). The average subsidence was similar to that in primary hip arthroplasty. The excellent long-term results of cemented collarless polished taper stems for primary and revision hip arthroplasty can be extended even further by cement-within-cement exchange, which preserves the femur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17920472     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

Review 1.  Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side using cemented implants.

Authors:  Graeme Holt; Samantha Hook; Matthew Hubble
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Cement-in-cement hip revision with a long-stemmed femoral component].

Authors:  T K Lichtinger; A Pingsmann; N Erol; C Schulze-Pellengahr; W Teske
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Difficulties associated with the variable geometry of different-offset Exeter long stems in cement-in-cement technique: A case report.

Authors:  Francisco Ferrero-Manzanal; Antonio Murcia-Asensio; Miguel Angel Suárez-Suárez; Raquel Lax-Pérez; Oliver Marín-Peña
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27

4.  A valuable technique for femoral stem revision in total hip replacement: The in-cement revision - A case series and technical note.

Authors:  C J McDougall; J Yu; K Calligeros; R Crawford; C R Howie
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-01

5.  The cement-in-cement technique is a reliable option in hip arthroplasty revision surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; Ana Daniela Pereira; Renato Andrade; André Sarmento; Ricardo Sousa; Olufemi R Ayeni; João Espregueira-Mendes; Daniel Soares
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-07-14

6.  Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips.

Authors:  Andrew J Berg; Antonia Hoyle; Edward Yates; Aslam Chougle; Rama Mohan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-09

7.  Femoral bone is preserved using cemented polished stems in young patients.

Authors:  Donald W Howie; Kerry Costi; Margaret A McGee; Angela Standen; Lucian B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise.

Authors:  Adam T Yasen; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  A prospective study of hip revision surgery using the Exeter long-stem prosthesis: function, subsidence, and complications for 57 patients.

Authors:  K Randhawa; F S Hossain; B Smith; Cyril Mauffrey; T Lawrence
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-10-24

10.  Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases.

Authors:  Toby W Briant-Evans; Darmaraja Veeramootoo; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Matthew J Hubble
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.