Literature DB >> 18514873

Quality of life outcomes in revision vs primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Sanjeev Patil1, Donald S Garbuz, Nelson V Greidanus, Bassam A Masri, Clive P Duncan.   

Abstract

This study included 143 patients who had revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 144 patients who had primary THA. The primary outcome variable in this study was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to assess the relationship between surgical procedure and postoperative health related quality of life outcomes. The mean follow-up period was 1.7 years (range, 1-3 years). The mean preoperative function of patients with primary THA was significantly worse than that in the revision group (delta = -6.2; P = .013). Postoperative functional outcome was significantly better in patients with primary THA (delta = 6.5, P = .016) than in patients who had revision THA. The magnitude of improvement in quality of life is greater for the patient with primary THA in comparison to the patient with revision THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18514873     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  26 in total

1.  [Indications for joint replacement : Total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  S Rahm; P O Zingg
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 2.  Contributions of human tissue analysis to understanding the mechanisms of loosening and osteolysis in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Jana Vaculova; Stuart B Goodman; Yrjö T Konttinen; Jacob P Thyssen
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Similar outcomes between two-stage revisions for infection and aseptic hip revisions.

Authors:  Maik Hoberg; Christian Konrads; Jana Engelien; Dorothee Oschmann; Michael Holder; Matthias Walcher; André Steinert; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Do revised hip resurfacing arthroplasties lead to outcomes comparable to those of primary and revised total hip arthroplasties?

Authors:  William Desloges; Isabelle Catelas; Toru Nishiwaki; Paul R Kim; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Jeremy Suggs; Steven M Kurtz; Michael T Manley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Higher body mass index is not associated with worse pain outcomes after primary or revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Sherine E Gabriel; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Risk factors for early revision after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Kevin J Bozic; Ting Jung Pan; Timothy M Wright; Douglas E Padgett; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Christine M Pui; Matthew J Ludeman; Thomas P Vail; Marc D Silverstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A positive hip arthrogram may predict lower function in patients with primary hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jason B T Lim; Lynne Horey; Sanjeev Patil; Robert M D Meek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Aseptic Loosening.

Authors:  Yuichi Kuroda; Shinya Hayashi; Shingo Hashimoto; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koji Takayama; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.