Literature DB >> 18278495

Femoral cement within cement technique in carefully selected aseptic revision arthroplasties.

Lucas Marcos1, Martin Buttaro, Fernando Comba, Francisco Piccaluga.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results in a group of patients who underwent aseptic revision hip arthroplasty using the cement within cement (CWC) technique. Between 1999 and 2005, 37 aseptic revision hip operations were performed. There were 30 women and five men, with an average age of 68 years. The reasons for revision were femoral stem fracture, cup failure, acetabular protrusion after hemi-arthroplasty and recurrent dislocation. At an average follow-up of 46 months, none of the patients required further femoral revision. The average post-operative Merle D'Aubigne score was 16.6 points (p<0.05). No evidence of radiological stem failure was observed and no femoral component was considered to be at risk for loosening. In this series of patients, the CWC technique provided consistent with high functional outcomes. This valid and effective alternative should be considered in carefully selected aseptic cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18278495      PMCID: PMC2903118          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0516-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis.

Authors:  R M D'AUBIGNE; M POSTEL
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  In-cement technique for revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J F Quinlan; K O'Shea; F Doyle; O H Brady
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

3.  Revision arthroplasty using Charnley low friction arthroplasty technic. With reference to specifics of technic and comparison of results with primary low friction arthroplasty.

Authors:  N S Eftekhar; D M Smith; J H Henry; F E Stinchfield
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Points in the technique of recementing in the revision of an implant arthroplasty.

Authors:  A S Greenwald; N C Narten; A H Wilde
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1978-02

5.  Subsidence of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement in relation to the design of the stem.

Authors:  J R Loudon; J Charnley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1980-11

6.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Changes in the calcar femoris in relation to cement technology in total hip replacement.

Authors:  F Bocco; P Langan; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Incidence and short-term outcomes of primary and revision hip replacement in the United States.

Authors:  Chunliu Zhan; Ronald Kaczmarek; Nilsa Loyo-Berrios; Judith Sangl; Roselie A Bright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Femoral fractures in revision hip surgeries with impacted bone allograft.

Authors:  Germán L Farfalli; Martín A Buttaro; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Persistent infection associated with residual cement after resection arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  Martin Buttaro; Roberto Valentini; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-08
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side using cemented implants.

Authors:  Graeme Holt; Samantha Hook; Matthew Hubble
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Cement-in-cement hip revision with a long-stemmed femoral component].

Authors:  T K Lichtinger; A Pingsmann; N Erol; C Schulze-Pellengahr; W Teske
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The cement-in-cement technique is a reliable option in hip arthroplasty revision surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; Ana Daniela Pereira; Renato Andrade; André Sarmento; Ricardo Sousa; Olufemi R Ayeni; João Espregueira-Mendes; Daniel Soares
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 4.  The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise.

Authors:  Adam T Yasen; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Strategies for stem revision : Surgery planning, implant removal and reimplantation].

Authors:  Sebastian Hardt; Lukas Schönnagel; Christian Hipfl
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-08

Review 6.  Cement-in-cement technique of the femoral component in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision: A systematic review of the contemporary literature.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Fabio Mancino; Amil Agarwal; Leonidas Roumeliotis; Alex Gu; Ioannis Gkiatas; Danilo Togninalli; Vasileios S Nikolaou; Michael M Alexiades
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-30

7.  The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  Marcin Ceynowa; Krzysztof Zerdzicki; Pawel Klosowski; Maciej Zrodowski; Rafal Pankowski; Marek Roclawski; Tomasz Mazurek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.