Literature DB >> 3421761

A 5- to 21-year follow-up and analysis of 250 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

F Michelassi1, G E Block, L Vannucci, A Montag, R Chappell.   

Abstract

A total of 250 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma were operated on at the University of Chicago Medical Center between 1965 and 1981. The operation performed was curative resection in 154 patients, palliative resection in 16 patients, diverting colostomy in 21 patients, exploratory laparotomy in 11 patients, and transanal removal in 48 patients. Of the 154 curative resections, 115 were abdomino-perineal (APR), three were total proctocolectomies, and 36 were low anterior resections (LAR). No anastomotic complications were observed in this latter group. Operative mortality was 3%. Complete follow-up was obtained in 152 patients (98.7%). Five- and 10-year actuarial survival rates were 68.8 and 59.4%, respectively, for patients with Dukes' B1 adenocarcinoma (n = 32), 55.8 and 44.2% for Dukes' B2 tumors (n = 52), and 42.9% and 25.4% for Dukes' C tumors (n = 63). Distant metastases developed in 59 patients (39.6%), and pelvic recurrence developed in another 18 patients (12%); 5-year survival rates were 23.6% and 22.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis with Cox regression showed that stage (p = 0.0001), race (p = 0.03), tumor morphology (p = 0.02), and vascular and/or lymphatic microinvasion (p = 0.001) were statistically significant in their association with survival. Logistic regression analysis confirmed these results and allowed for the estimation of 5-year survival probabilities in 16 groups of patients defined by various associations of these four factors. These estimates ranged from a high of 92% in Caucasian patients with Stage B, exophytic tumors with no vascular or lymphatic microinvasion, to a low of 14% in black patients with Stage C, nonexophytic tumors and with the presence of vascular and/or lymphatic microinvasion. Univariate analysis showed that histologic type (p = 0.0006), stage (p = 0.05) and vascular and/or lymphatic microinvasion (p less than 0.001) were significantly associated with the incidence of pelvic recurrence. Analysis of the extent of the operation revealed that the incidence of pelvic recurrence was reduced by the performance of a wide pelvic lymphadenectomy (9.4% vs. 16.4%), but the result did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.16). In conclusion, this study confirms the well-established prognostic value of the Dukes' staging classification of rectal carcinoma. Further, the analysis reveals that race, tumor morphology, and the presence or absence of lymphatic and/or vascular microinvasion significantly influence outcome. By associating these four statistically significant and independent variables, the prognosis for any individual patient can be estimated more precisely than by using Dukes' staging alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3421761      PMCID: PMC1493650          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198809000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  22 in total

1.  Factors influencing local recurrence after abdominoperineal resection for cancer of the rectum and rectosigmoid.

Authors:  A R Moossa; P C Ree; J E Marks; B Levin; C E Platz; D B Skinner
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  THE PATTERN OF BLOOD-BORNE METASTASIS FROM CARCINOMA OF RECTUM.

Authors:  L DIONNE
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Cancer of the colon and rectum; a statistical study of 608 patients.

Authors:  N W SWINTON; E MOSZKOWSKI; J C SNOW
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1959-06       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Venous invasion in carcinoma of the rectum as evidenced by venous radiography.

Authors:  M S MADISON; M B DOCKERTY; J M WAUGH
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1954-08

5.  THE LYMPHATIC AND VENOUS SPREAD OF CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM.

Authors:  R S Grinnell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1942-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  THE SPREAD OF CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM: INVASION OF LYMPHATICS, VEINS AND NERVES.

Authors:  P H Seefeld; J A Bargen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1943-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  THE GRADING AND PROGNOSIS OF CARCINOMA OF THE COLON AND RECTUM.

Authors:  R S Grinnell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1939-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Venous Spread in Rectal Cancer: (Section of Proctology).

Authors:  C E Dukes; H J Bussey
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1941-07

9.  Pathological studies in rectal cancer.

Authors:  A M Cohen; W C Wood; L L Gunderson; M Shinnar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer.

Authors:  I C Talbot; S Ritchie; M H Leighton; A O Hughes; H J Bussey; B C Morson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  20 in total

1.  Total pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer: outcomes and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Trustin S Domes; Patrick H D Colquhoun; Brian Taylor; Jonathan I Izawa; Andrew A House; Patrick P W Luke; Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Postsurgical disparity in survival between African Americans and Caucasians with colonic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dominik Alexander; Chakrapani Chatla; Ellen Funkhouser; Sreelatha Meleth; William E Grizzle; Upender Manne
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Systematic review of prognostic importance of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Manish Chand; Muhammed R S Siddiqui; Ian Swift; Gina Brown
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Locally recurrent rectal cancer: surgical strategy.

Authors:  J P de Azevedo; R R Dozois; L L Gunderson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Eat your cereal.

Authors:  B Gardner
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Analysis of allelic imbalance in patients with colorectal cancer according to stage and presence of synchronous liver metastases.

Authors:  J C Weber; A Schneider; S Rohr; H Nakano; P Bachellier; A Méchine; G Hamel; M Kanor; M P Chenard; M P Gaub; P Oudet; C Meyer; D Jaeck
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J L McCall; M R Cox; D A Wattchow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Simultaneous colorectal and hepatic procedures for colorectal cancer result in increased morbidity but equivalent mortality compared with colorectal or hepatic procedures alone: outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Osama H Hamed; Neil H Bhayani; Gail Ortenzi; Jussuf T Kaifi; Eric T Kimchi; Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll; Niraj J Gusani
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  Survival and recurrence after low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: the results of a long-term study with a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Konn; T Morita; R Hada; Y Yamanaka; M Sasaki; H Munakata; H Suzuki; S Inoue; M Endoh; Y Sugiyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Pelvic recurrence after surgical treatment of rectal and sigmoid cancer. A prospective clinical trial on 274 patients.

Authors:  S Tagliacozzo; M Accordino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.