Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 THE GRADING AND PROGNOSIS OF CARCINOMA OF THE COLON AND RECTUM.

Literature DB >> 17857341

THE GRADING AND PROGNOSIS OF CARCINOMA OF THE COLON AND RECTUM.

R S Grinnell.

Abstract

Entities: Disease

Year: 1939 PMID： 17857341 PMCID： PMC1391306 DOI： 10.1097/00000658-193904000-00002

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Surg ISSN： 0003-4932 Impact factor: 12.969

× No keyword cloud information.

4 in total

1. CARCINOMAS OF THE LARGE BOWEL. (Part I.): THE COLON.

Authors: T S Raiford
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1935-03 Impact factor: 12.969

2. Biopsy Histology in the Grading of Rectal Carcinoma.

Authors: F W Stewart; J W Spies
Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 1929-03 Impact factor: 4.307

3. COLLOID CARCINOMA.

Authors: D Parham
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1923-01 Impact factor: 12.969

4. INVOLVEMENT OF THE LYMPH GLANDS IN CANCER OF THE CAECUM.

Authors: W M Craig; W C Maccarty
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1923-06 Impact factor: 12.969

4 in total

26 in total

1. Dukes' staging is poorly understood by doctors managing colorectal cancer.

Authors: K S Mainprize; N J Mc C Mortensen; B F Warren
Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 1.891

2. THE LYMPHATIC AND VENOUS SPREAD OF CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM.

Authors: R S Grinnell
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1942-08 Impact factor: 12.969

3. ASEPTIC, IMMEDIATE ANASTOMOSIS FOLLOWING RESECTION OF THE COLON FOR CARCINOMA.

Authors: J H Gibbon; C C Hodge
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1941-10 Impact factor: 12.969

4. Gastric cancer; morphologic factors in 5-year survival after gastrectomy.

Authors: P E STEINER; S N MAIMON
Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 1948-09 Impact factor: 4.307

5. Origins of ... image analysis in clinical pathology.

Authors: G A Meijer; J A Beliën; P J van Diest; J P Baak
Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 3.411

6. Do adverse histopathologic findings in colorectal cancer patients explain disparate outcomes?

Authors: Keith D Gray; Billy R Ballard; M Kay Washington; Rhonda Belue; William M Grady; William C Chapman; Steven C Stain
Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 1.798

7. Colorectal carcinoma grading by quantifying poorly differentiated cell clusters is more reproducible and provides more robust prognostic information than conventional grading.

Authors: Valeria Barresi; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Giovanni Branca; Carmela Di Gregorio; Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Giovanni Tuccari
Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 4.064