Literature DB >> 11729386

Analysis of allelic imbalance in patients with colorectal cancer according to stage and presence of synchronous liver metastases.

J C Weber1, A Schneider, S Rohr, H Nakano, P Bachellier, A Méchine, G Hamel, M Kanor, M P Chenard, M P Gaub, P Oudet, C Meyer, D Jaeck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between number and location of allelic imbalances (AI) and local tumor progression according to Astler-Coller classification. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Spontaneous errors in DNA replication (i.e., allelic imbalance or microsatellite instability) have been suggested to play an important role in carcinomatous transformation as reflecting alterations of gene function.
METHODS: One hundred two consecutive patients with colorectal carcinoma undergoing surgical resection were included in this study. Patients were distributed according to the Astler-Coller classification as stages A (n = 7), B1 (n = 15), B2 (n = 24), C (n = 31), and D (n = 25). Fluorescent polymerase chain reaction was performed on frozen tumor, normal colon mucosa, and blood DNA at 35 microsatellite markers. Allelic imbalance frequency was compared with tumor staging.
RESULTS: The percentage of AI was significantly higher in stage D than in A/B1 and B2. In addition, the percentage of AI was significantly higher in 10 synchronous colorectal liver metastases than in stage A/B1 and B2 tumors. However, the allelotyping revealed a subgroup of A/B1 tumors with a high AI frequency. Statistical analysis showed that the presence of AI at microsatellites D1S305, D2S138, D3S1282, D17S790, and D22S928 presented a significantly positive correlation with stages.
CONCLUSION: The frequency of AI significantly correlates with tumor progression of colorectal cancer. Primary tumors with synchronous colorectal liver metastases showed a higher percentage of AI, suggesting that a frequency of AI greater than 35% with this selection of markers indicates a high risk of local progression and of development of metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11729386      PMCID: PMC1422139          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200112000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  54 in total

1.  Alternative genetic pathways in colorectal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  S Olschwang; R Hamelin; P Laurent-Puig; B Thuille; Y De Rycke; Y J Li; F Muzeau; J Girodet; R J Salmon; G Thomas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Analysis of colorectal cancer by comparative genomic hybridization: evidence for induction of the metastatic phenotype by loss of tumor suppressor genes.

Authors:  A Paredes-Zaglul; J J Kang; Y P Essig; W Mao; R Irby; M Wloch; T J Yeatman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Prognostic significance of allelic lost at chromosome 18q21 for stage II colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J M Carethers; M T Hawn; J K Greenson; C L Hitchcock; C R Boland
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Mutational analysis of the APC/beta-catenin/Tcf pathway in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A B Sparks; P J Morin; B Vogelstein; K W Kinzler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Prognostic significance of DNA replication errors in young patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J R Lukish; K Muro; J DeNobile; R Katz; J Williams; D F Cruess; W Drucker; I Kirsch; S R Hamilton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Diagnostic microsatellite instability: definition and correlation with mismatch repair protein expression.

Authors:  W Dietmaier; S Wallinger; T Bocker; F Kullmann; R Fishel; J Rüschoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C R Boland; S N Thibodeau; S R Hamilton; D Sidransky; J R Eshleman; R W Burt; S J Meltzer; M A Rodriguez-Bigas; R Fodde; G N Ranzani; S Srivastava
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Allelotype analysis of early colorectal cancers with lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  T Arai; Y Akiyama; A Yamamura; T Hosoi; T Shibata; K Saitoh; S Okabe; Y Yuasa
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1998-08-21       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 9.  An overview of topoisomerase I-targeting agents.

Authors:  S G Arbuck; C H Takimoto
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.851

10.  Cytogenetic comparisons of synchronous carcinomas and polyps in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G Bardi; L A Parada; L Bomme; N Pandis; R Willén; B Johansson; B Jeppsson; K Beroukas; S Heim; F Mitelman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Repeated anastomotic recurrence of colorectal tumors: genetic analysis of two cases.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Cinzia Azzoni; Federico Marchesi; Lorena Bottarelli; Vincenzo Violi; Cesare Bordi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Chromosomal instability in the lymphocytes of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Kaur Harsimran; Monga Gaganpreet Kaur; Setia Nitika; Sudan Meena; Uppal M S; Batra A P S; Sambyal Vasudha
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-01

3.  Allelotyping identification of genomic alterations in rectal chromosomally unstable tumors without preoperative treatment.

Authors:  Benoît Romain; Agnès Neuville; Nicolas Meyer; Cécile Brigand; Serge Rohr; Anne Schneider; Marie-Pierre Gaub; Dominique Guenot
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.