| Literature DB >> 34208532 |
Stanislav Sukhikh1,2, Svetlana Noskova1, Artem Pungin1, Svetlana Ivanova3,4, Liubov Skrypnik1, Evgeny Chupakhin1, Olga Babich1.
Abstract
The results of the studies have shown that to obtain an extract of a complex of biologically active substances of Cotinus coggygria, ethyl alcohol (mass fraction of alcohol 70%) with a hydromodule of 1:5 should be used, and the extraction should be carried out for 60 min at a temperature of 60 °C. The investigated plant extracts with the complex of bioactive substances from the Cotinus coggygria leaves and flowers are safe from the point of view of the content of heavy metals, pesticides, aflatoxin B1, radionuclides, as well as pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms. It has been established that the Cotinus coggygria extract contains rutin, hyperoside, ferulic acid, quercetin, kaempferol, disulphuretin, sulphurein, sulphurein, gallic acid, methyl gallate, pentagalloyl glucose, 3,3',4',5,6,7-hexahydroxyflavonone, 3,3',4',5,5',7-hexahydroxyflavonone, 3-O-α-L-rhamnofuranoside, 3,3',4',5,5',7-hexahydroxyflavulium(1+), 7-O-β-D glucopyranoside, and 3,3',4',7-tetrahydroxyflavonone. The tested extracts have anticancer, antigenotoxic, and antimicrobial (against E. coli, S. aureus, P. vulgaris, C. albicans, L. mesenteroides) properties. The high antioxidant status of the tested extracts was established; the antioxidant activity of the samples was 145.09 mg AA/g (AA-ascorbic acid).Entities:
Keywords: Cotinus coggygria; antimicrobial properties; antioxidant activity; biologically active substances; extracts; toxicological
Year: 2021 PMID: 34208532 PMCID: PMC8235186 DOI: 10.3390/plants10061224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The Cotinus coggygria extract yield (%) at various hydromodule indicators and extraction process duration.
| Hydromodule | Process Duration, min | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 30 | 60 | 120 | 180 | 360 | |
| 1:1 | 2.52 ± 0.07 a/a | 3.81 ± 0.11 a/a | 5.22 ± 0.15 a/b | 7.29 ± 0.22 a/c | 7.38 ± 0.22 a/c | 7.38 ± 0.22 a/c |
| 1:2 | 2.88 ± 0.08 a/a | 3.94 ± 0.11 a/ab | 4.35 ± 0.13 a/b | 6.58 ± 0.20 a/c | 7.67 ± 0.23 a/c | 7.71 ± 0.24 a/c |
| 1:5 | 6.24 ± 0.18 b/a | 8.83 ± 0.26 b/b | 8.78 ± 0.26 b/b | 8.88 ± 0.26 b/b | 9.95 ± 0.29 b/b | 8.81 ± 0.25 b/b |
| 1:10 | 3.48 ± 0.10 a/a | 3.98 ± 0.12 a/a | 2.98 ± 0.09 c/a | 5.94 ± 0.18 a/b | 5.97 ± 0.18 a/b | 6.04 ± 0.19 a/b |
| 1:20 | 2.42 ± 0.07 a/a | 3.01 ± 0.09 a/a | 5.01 ± 0.15 a/b | 5.95 ± 0.18 a/bc | 6.01 ± 0.18 a/c | 6.07 ± 0.18 a/c |
Data presented as a mean ± SD (n = 3). Values in columns/rows followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (p > 0.05), as assessed by post hoc test (Tukey test).
The Cotinus coggygria extract yield (%) at various temperature indicators and extraction process duration.
| Temperature, °C | Process Duration, min | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 30 | 60 | 120 | 180 | 360 | |
| 25 | 6.21 ± 0.18 a/a | 8.83 ± 0.26 a/b | 8.78 ± 0.26 a/b | 8.88 ± 0.26 a/b | 9.95 ± 0.29 a/c | 8.81 ± 0.26 a/b |
| 40 | 7.55 ± 0.22 b/a | 7.98 ± 0.24 a/a | 8.92 ± 0.27 a/b | 9.21 ± 0.27 a/b | 8.18 ± 0.24 b/ab | 7.24 ± 0.22 b/a |
| 60 | 9.79 ± 0.29 c/a | 12.35 ± 0.37 b/b | 16.98 ± 0.51 b/c | 14.05 ± 0.42 b/d | 14.01 ± 0.42 c/d | 13.12 ± 0.39 c/e |
| Boiling | 7.62 ± 0.23 b/a | 8.14 ± 0.24 a/a | 14.04 ± 0.42 c/b | 14.12 ± 0.42 b/b | 14.14 ± 0.42 c/b | 12.17 ± 0.36 d/c |
Data presented as a mean ± SD (n = 3). Values in columns/rows followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (p > 0.05), as assessed by post hoc test (Tukey test).
Figure 1Preparative isolation of (1) rutin, (2) hyperoside, and (3) ferulic acid.
Figure 2Preparative isolation of (1) disulphuretin, (2) sulphuretin, (3) sulphurein, (4) quercetin, and (5) kaempferol.
Figure 3Hydroxyflavones isolated by preparative chromatography: 1—apigenin; 2—rutin; 3—hyperoside; 4—ferulic acid; 5—quercetin; 6—kaempferol.
Figure 4Derivatives of gallic and benzoic acids isolated by preparative chromatography: 1—7-O-β-D glucopyranoside; 2—pentagalloyl glucose; 3—methyl gallate; 4—3-O-α-L-rhamnofuranoside; 5—gallic acid.
The quantitative composition of individual BAS in the Cotinus coggygria extract.
| BAS | BAS Content, mg/kg |
|---|---|
| Rutin | 51.88 ± 1.55 |
| Hyperoside | 40.67 ± 1.22 |
| Ferulic acid | 5.62 ± 0.16 |
| Quercetin | 15.04 ± 0.45 |
| Kaempferol | 14.33 ± 0.42 |
| Disulphuretin | 0.240 ± 0.007 |
| Sulphuretin | 1.11 ± 0.03 |
| Sulphurein | 0.270 ± 0.008 |
| Gallic acid | 4.81 ± 0.14 |
| Methyl gallate | 3.51 ± 0.10 |
| Pentagalloyl glucose | 21.14 ± 0.63 |
| 3,3′,4′,5,6,7–Hexahydroxyflavonone | 15.92 ± 0.47 |
| 3,3′,4′,5,5′,7–Hexahydroxyflavonone | 15.33 ± 0.46 |
| 3- | 8.72 ± 0.25 |
| 3,3′,4′,5,5′,7–Hexahydroxyflavulium(1+) | 5.09 ± 0.15 |
| 7- | 14.51 ± 0.43 |
| 3,3′,4′,7– Tetrahydroxyflavonone | 7.77 ± 0.22 |
Data presented as a mean ± SD (n = 3).
Indicators of antimicrobial activity (diameter of the lysis zone, mm) of the Cotinus coggygria extract.
| Sample | Test Cultures | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| Extract | 16.5 ± 0.5 | 14.5 ± 0.5 | 11.0 ± 0.5 | 13.0 ± 0.5 | 14.5 ± 0.5 | 13.0 ± 0.5 |
| Control | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rifampicin | 23.0 ± 0.5 | 21.0 ± 0.5 | 20.0 ± 0.5 | 19.5 ± 0.5 | 18.0 ± 0.5 | 18.0 ± 0.5 |
1—E. coli; 2—S. aureus; 3—P. vulgaris; 4—C. albicans; 5—L. mesenteroides; 6—P. expansum; control—test culture medium. Data presented as a mean ± SD (n = 3).
Cytotoxicity indicators of medicinal plant Cotinus coggygria extract samples.
| Sample | IC50, μg/mL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glioblastoma Cells | Hep-G2 | MCF-7 | A549 | HCT116 | |
| Extract | 45.68 ± 2.26 | 65.47 ± 2.48 | 48.23 ± 2.30 | 32.40 ± 2.02 | 33.13 ± 2.03 |
Data presented as a mean ± SD (n = 3).
The influence of Cotinus coggygria extract samples on the activity of antioxidant enzymes.
| Sample | Antioxidant Markers, mM TE/g FM * | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABTS | ORAC | FRAP | DPPH | SOD | TEAC | |
| Crocin (control) | 0.13 ± 0.01 a | 0.16 ± 0.01 a | 0.10 ± 0.01 a | 0.13 ± 0.01 a | 0.14 ± 0.01 a | 0.16 ± 0.01 a |
| Extract | 0.46 ± 0.02 b | 0.21 ±0.01 a | 0.15 ±0.01 a | 0.29 ± 0.02 b | 0.35 ± 0.02 a | 0.26 ± 0.02 a |
* mM TE/g FM—mM Trolox equivalent/g fresh mass. Data presented as a mean ± SD (n = 3). Values in columns followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (p > 0.05), as assessed by post hoc test (Tukey test). ABTS—2,2-azinobis (3ehtylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt; ORAC—the oxygen radical absorbance capacity; FRAP—Ferric reducing antioxidant power; DPPH—diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; SOD—superoxide dismutase; TEAC—6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox)-equivalent antioxidant capacity.