Literature DB >> 30103451

Phytochemicals in Helicobacter pylori Infections: What Are We Doing Now?

Bahare Salehi1,2, Farukh Sharopov3, Miquel Martorell4, Jovana Rajkovic5, Adedayo Oluwaseun Ademiluyi6, Mehdi Sharifi-Rad7, Patrick Valere Tsouh Fokou8, Natália Martins9,10, Marcello Iriti11, Javad Sharifi-Rad12,13.   

Abstract

In this critical review, plant sources used as effective antibacterial agents against Helicobacter pylori infections are carefully described. The main intrinsic bioactive molecules, responsible for the observed effects are also underlined and their corresponding modes of action specifically highlighted. In addition to traditional uses as herbal remedies, in vitro and in vivo studies focusing on plant extracts and isolated bioactive compounds with anti-H. pylori activity are also critically discussed. Lastly, special attention was also given to plant extracts with urease inhibitory effects, with emphasis on involved modes of action.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Helicobacter pylori; anti-urease activity; in vitro/in vivo findings; opportunistic colonization; phytopharmacology; plant products

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30103451      PMCID: PMC6121492          DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


1. Introduction

Plant products, their enriched-derived extracts, and their isolated bioactive molecules have been increasingly studied due their renowned health attributes, largely used in folk medicine over centuries for multiple purposes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Indeed, phytomedicine is garnering much attention among the medical and scientific communities [10,11,12]. Commercially available synthetic drugs have often been negatively pointed out due to their side effects and related toxicity [13]. In fact, the active molecules used in pharmaceutical formulation are formerly derived from bioactive molecules extracted from plants and other living organisms [14]. Also, a growing number of studies have progressively underlined the multiple bioactive properties conferred by plant formulations [15,16]. Specifically, the antimicrobial effects of multiple plant preparations have been progressively confirmed and supported by both in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical trials [17,18,19,20,21]. Thus, their lower costs, high effectiveness, bioavailability, bioefficacy, and few to no adverse effects have led to intensive research on this topic [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Among the various opportunistic infections, those caused by Helicobacter pylori, a human opportunistic pathogen, is attracting much attention [29]. In fact, it is widely recognized that this bacterium plays an important role in the etiology of peptic and gastric ulcers and even gastric cancers and gastric lymphomas [29]. About half of the worldwide population is colonized by this bacterium, but there are only about 20% who manifest clinical symptoms, which has been linked to the ability of some H. pylori strains to both adapt to host’s immunological responses and to support an ever-changing gastric environment [29]. Relatedly, increasing rates of antibiotic-resistant H. pylori strains have been found, and therefore, the search for new eradication strategies and effective antibiotic therapies has become an issue of crucial importance [30]. Hence, research effort is focused on exploring plants as sources of anti-H. pylori agents. Based on these findings, the present report aims to provide an extensive overview of Helicobacter pylori infections, namely describing its involvement in triggering gastric cancer and the most common antimicrobials used in H. pylori eradication. Special attention is also given to medicinal plants and their corresponding extracts and isolated constituents used as anti-H. pylori agents and urease inhibitors. This review was performed by consulting the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar (as a search engine); only full-text available articles were considered, and articles published from 2008 to 2018 were prioritized. The search strategy included the combination of following keywords: “Helicobacter pylori”, “anti-Helicobacter”, “medicinal plant”, “plant extract”, “essential oil”, “bioactive”, “phytochemical”, “antimicrobial”, and “eradication”.

2. Helicobacter pylori and Gastric Cancer

H. pylori infection has been implicated in the development of gastric cancer, a multifactorial disease and a leading cause of mortality. The risk factors for gastric cancer have been shown to include environmental factors and factors that influence host–pathogen interaction, as well as the complex interplay between these factors [31]. Modern lifestyle, high stress levels, smoking and excessive alcohol consumption, nutritional deficiencies, and prolonged use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are amongst the most relevant etiological environmental factors [32]. This bacterial infection has been linked to the initiation of chronic gastritis that could later lead to adenocarcinoma of the intestine [33]. However, several mechanisms have been proposed to represent the involvement of H. pylori infection in tumorigenesis. Several bacterial virulence factors, such as the cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) protein, present in the DNA insertion element Cag pathogenicity island (CagPAI), were found to be of prominent importance in carcinogenesis [34]. Likewise, bacterial peptidoglycan can be delivered into gastric epithelial cells, where it activates a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt pathway leading to cell proliferation, migration, and prevention of apoptosis [35]. Furthermore, H. pylori-induced gastric inflammation involves the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2)/prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) pathway and inflammatory marker interleukin 1β (IL-1β), which are important factors triggering chronic active gastritis and adenocarcinoma [31]. Studies have also shown that H. pylori infection-induced oxidative stress and DNA damage coupled with dysregulation of E-cadherin/β-catenin/p120 interactions also play critical roles in tumorigenesis [31]. Several environmental and dietary factors have also been suggested to modify H. pylori-induced adenocarcinoma [36]. Gastric adenocarcinoma is strongly influenced by dietary salt intake, with high salt intake aggravating tumorigenesis [37].

3. Antimicrobials for H. pylori Eradication

The success of H. pylori eradication markedly depends on the type and duration of treatment, patient compliance to therapy, and antibiotic resistance. For example, because it is difficult to achieve optimal eradication of H. pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcers, combinational regimens using two or three antibiotics in addition to a proton pump inhibitor or bismuth are often prescribed to achieve higher eradication rates and to prevent antibiotic resistance emergence [38,39]. These regimens, also known as triple therapies, have cure rates of around 85–90%. They are usually administered for a period of about 10–14 days, in which treatment regimens include the following: (A) bismuth subsalicylate, metronidazole, and tetracycline for 14 days; (B) omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for 10 days; and (C) lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for either 10 or 14 days. Unfortunately, the heightening of antimicrobial resistance has been associated with increases in the standard triple therapies failure to eradicate H. pylori infection [40]. Hence, research is focusing on developing potent and effective antibacterial regimens that will favor total eradication of the infection. Nonetheless, any eradication treatment comes with some degree of adverse effects, such as nausea, metallic taste, vomiting, skin rash, and diarrhea. Therefore, efforts are being channeled towards the development of effective treatments with few to no side effects. In the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report, 43 experts from 24 countries provided recommendations on the basis of the best available evidence and relevance to the current therapeutic options of management of H. pylori infection in the various clinical scenarios [41].

4. Plant Extracts and Phytochemicals with Anti-Helicobacter pylori Activity

Considering that H. pylori infection has been associated with gastrointestinal diseases, including chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric carcinoma, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma [42], and that, due to the widespread use of therapeutic agents for the eradication of this bacterium and associated-side effects, increasing rates of H. pylori strains with acquired resistance have been discovered. So, the urgent need for alternative has been rekindled and aided by the use of natural drugs [32]. Despite, the newly proposed and used tri-therapy regimens, the cost of acid suppressors and stomach protectors make it inaccessible to the majority of the population [43]. Naturally-derived drugs, including herbs, have been shown to display anti-H. pylori activities with minimal side effects, easy accessibility, and affordability [42,44]. In fact, many medicinal plants have been reported in the traditional management of gastrointestinal disorders. Many of these medicinal plants have gone through bioassays to assess their potency against H. pylori. Here, the anti-H. pylori activity of medicinal plants and isolated bioactive molecules is discussed [45]. Almost all plant parts have been tested for anti-H. pylori activity. Plant extract preparations include water (Table 1), essential oils (Table 2), or organic solvents, such as the following: ethanol (Table 3); methanol (Table 4); acetone (Table 5); chloroform (Table 6); petroleum ether (Table 7); methanol/water, ethanol/water, methanol/petroleum, and methanol/dichloromethane extracts (Table 8); and other plant extracts (Table 9).
Table 1

Plant aqueous extracts with anti-Helicobacter pylori activity.

SpeciesFamilyPartsAnti-H. pylori PotencyRef.
Acacia nilotica (L.) Delile Leguminosae FlowersMIC = 8–64 μg/mL[49]
Adhatoda vasica Nees Acanthaceae Whole plantMIC = 16–512 μg/mL[49]
Alepidea amatymbica Eckl. and Zeyh Apiaceae Roots/RhizomesIZD = 8.0 ± 8.2 mm[50,51]
Amphipterygium adstringens (Schltdl.) Standl. Anacardiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 62.5–125 µg/mL[52]
Annona cherimola Mill. Annonaceae Leaves/StemMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Artemisia ludoviciana Nutt. subsp. mexicana (Willd. ex Spreng.) Fernald Compositae Leaves/stemsMIC = 125 µg/mL[52]
Bridelia micrantha (Hochst.) Baill. Phyllanthaceae BarkIZD = 0–15 mm;MIC50 = 48–313 mg/mL;MIC90 = 78 ≥ 625 µg/mL[53]
Buddleja perfoliata Kunth Scrophulariaceae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Calandrinia ciliata (Ruiz and Pav.) DC. (cited as Calandrinia micrantha Schltdl.) Portulacaceae Leaves/StemsMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Calotropis procera (Aiton) W.T. Aiton Apocynaceae LeavesMIC = 16–256 μg/mL[49]
FlowersMIC = 8–256 μg/mL[49]
Campyloneurum amphostenon (Kunze ex Klotzsch) Fée Polypodiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Casuarina equisetifolia L. Casuarinaceae FruitMIC = 128–1024 μg/mL[49]
Chenopodium incisum Poir. (cited as Teloxys graveolens (Willd.) W. A. Weber) Amaranthaceae Aerial partsMIC = 250 µg/mL[52]
Cichorium intybus L. Asteraceae RootIZD < 9 mm[47]
Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume Lauraceae BarkIZD < 9 mm[47]
Cistus laurifolius L. Cistaceae FlowersMIC = 62.5–125 µg/mL[54]
Citrus reticulata Blanco Rutaceae Fruit shellMIC = 100 µg/mL[55]
Cocculus hirsutus (L.) Diels. Menispermaceae LeavesIZD = 22 mm (200–1000 μg/mL)[56]
Combretum molle R. Br. Ex G. Don Combretaceae BarkIZD = 2.7 ± 5.5 mm[50,51]
Coriandrum sativum L. Apiaceae SeedIZD = 9 mm;MIC = 1.25–5 mg/mL[47]
Corydalis yanhusuo W.T. Wang Papaveraceae StemMIC = 100 µg/mL[55]
Cuminum cyminum L. Apiaceae SeedIZD < 9 mm[47]
Cuphea aequipetala Cav. Lythraceae Aerial partsMIC = 125 μg/mL[57]
MIC = 125 µg/mL[52]
Cynara scolymus L. Asteraceae LeavesIZD = 18 mm;MIC= 1.25–5 mg/mL[47]
Cyrtocarpa procera Kunth Anacardiaceae BarkMIC = 125 µg/mL[58]
MIC = 250 µg/mL[52]
Desmos cochinchinensis Lour. Annonaceae LeavesIZD = 10.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin and Clemants (cited as Teloxys ambrosioides (L.) W. A. Weber) Amaranthaceae Aerial partsMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Maton. Zingiberaceae SeedsIZD < 9 mm[47]
Eryngium carlinae F. Delaroche Apiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Eugenia caryophyllata Thunb Myrtaceae FlowerMIC = 60 µg/mL[55]
Eupatorium petiolare Moc. ex DC. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Fagoniaar abica L. Zygophyllaceae Whole plantMIC = 16–256 μg/mL[49]
Foeniculum vulgare Mill. var. dulce DC Apiaceae SeedIZD < 9 mm;MIC = 5–10 mg/mL[47]
Fritillaria thunbergii Miq. Liliaceae StemMIC = 40 µg/mL[55]
Garcinia kola Heckel Guttiferae SeedsIZD = 1.0 ± 2.6 mm[50,51]
Geum iranicum Khatamsaz Rosaceae RootIZD = 24–35 mm (100 µg/mL)[60]
Gnaphalium canescens DC. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Grindelia inuloides Willd. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Hesperozygis marifolia Epling Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Heterotheca inuloides Cass. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Juniperus communis L. Cupressaceae BerryIZD < 9 mm[47]
Larrea tridentata (Sessé and Moc. ex DC.) Coville Zygophyllaceae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Ligusticum striatum DC (cited as Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort.) Apiaceae RootMIC = 100 µg/mL[55]
Lippia graveolens Kunth (cited as Lippia berlandieri Schauer) Verbenaceae Aerial partsMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Ludwigia repens J. R. Forst. Onagraceae Aerial partsMIC = 125 µg/mL[52]
Machaeranthera riparia (Kunth) A.G. Jones Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Machaeranthera tanacetifolia (Kunth) Nees Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Mentha × piperita L. Lamiaceae LeavesIZD < 9 mm[47]
Mirabilis jalapa L. Nyctaginaceae Aerial partsMIC = 250 µg/mL[52]
Monarda citriodora var. austromontana (Epling) B. L. Turner (cited as Monarda austromontana Epling) Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Olea europaea L. Oleaceae Leaves/StemMIC = 125 µg/mL[52]
Origanum vulgare L. Lamiaceae LeavesIZD = 25 mm;MIC = 0.6–2.5 mg/mL[47]
Orthosiphon aristatus (Blume) Miq. (cited as Orthosiphon stamineus Benth) Lamiaceae LeavesIZD = 9.0 ± 1.3 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
StemIZD = 8.0 ± 0.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Peumus boldus Mol. Monimiaceae Leaves>1500 μg/mL[61]
Plantago major L. Plantaginaceae Aerial partsMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Priva grandiflora (Ortega) Moldenke Verbenaceae Aerial partsMIC = 250 µg/mL[52]
Prunus avium L. Rosaceae PedunclesIZD = 9 mm;MIC = 5–10 mg/mL[47]
Rosmarinus officinalis L. Lamiaceae LeavesIZD < 9 mm[47]
Ruta chalepensis L. Rutaceae LeavesMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Salvia officinalis L. Lamiaceae LeavesIZD = 10 mm;MIC = 1.25–10 mg/mL[47]
Sclerocarya birrea A. Rich Hochst Anacardiaceae Stem barkMIC = 0.16–2.5 mg/mL;IZD = 15.0 ± 2.7 mm[50,51]
Tagetes lucida Cav. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. ex Kunth Bignoniaceae Aerial partsMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Terminalia catappa L. Combretaceae Aerial partsMIC = 125 µg/mL[62]
Terminalia chebula Retz Combretaceae FruitMIC = 125 mg/mL;MBC = 150 mg/mL[63]
Thymus serpyllum L. Lamiaceae Aerial partsIZD = 10 mm;MIC = 1.25–10 mg/mL[47]
Tillandsia usneoides L. Bromeliaceae Aerial partsMIC = 1000 µg/mL[52]
Tinospora sagittata Gagnep. Menispermaceae RootMIC = 100 µg/mL[55]
Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A.G. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Verbena carolina L. Verbenaceae Aerial partsMIC = 62.5–125 µg/mL[52]
Zingiber officinale Roscoe Zingiberaceae RhizomeIZD = 9 mm;MIC = 2.5–5 mg/mL[47]

MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; IZD, inhibition zone diameter; MBC, minimal bactericidal concentration.

Table 2

Plant essential oils with anti-H. pylori activity.

SpeciesFamilyPartsAnti-H. pylori PotencyRef.
Abies mariesii Mast. (cited as Abies maritima) Pinaceae PineIZD = 22 ± 2 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 14 ± 1 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Allium sativum L. Amaryllidaceae Cloves8–32 μg/mL[65]
Artemisia dracunculus L. Compositae TarragonIZD = 7 ± 0 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Carum carvi L. Apiaceae CarawayIZD = 12 ± 0 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume Lauraceae BarkMIC = 0.3 μL/mL;IZD = 24.8 mm[66]
IZD = 63 ± 0.5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 45 ± 5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Cistus ladanifer L. Cistaceae CistusIZD = 8 ± 0 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 16 ± 1.5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Citrus aurantium L. Rutaceae Orange blossom>88% inhibition (0.3 μL/mL)[66]
IZD = 12 ± 0 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 16 ± 0 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f. Rutaceae LemonIZD = 16 ± 0 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 14 ± 10 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Citrus paradise Macfad Rutaceae White grapefruitIZD = 29 ± 2.5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 17 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
GrapefruitIZD = 13 ± 0.5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Tea treeIZD = 9 ± 0 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Cupressus sempervirens L. Cupressaceae CypressIZD = 19 ± 3.5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 11 ± 10 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf Poaceae LemongrassIZD = 32 ± 7 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 23 ± 0.05 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Daucus carota L. Apiaceae Carrot seedIZD = 8 ± 0.5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 16 ± 1.5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Dittrichia viscosa (L.) Greuter subsp. revoluta Asteraceae Aerial parts0.33 μL/mL *[67]
Eucalyptus globulus L. Myrtaceae EucalyptusIZD = 10 ± 1 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 12 ± 10 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Eugenia caryophyllus (Spreng.) Bullock and S. G. Harrison Myrtaceae Clove-budIZD = 13 ± 2.5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Clove-leafIZD = 25 ± 5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Heracleum persicum L. Apiaceae Fruits>88% inhibition (0.3 μL/mL)[66]
Juniperus communis L. Cupressaceae BerryIZD = 14 ± 0.5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 10 ± 1 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Leptospermum scoparium J. R. Forst and G. Forst Myrtaceae ManukaIZD = 23 ± 3 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Aloysia citriodora Palau (cited as Lippia citriodora) Verbenaceae Aerial partsIZD = 29 ± 2 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Matricaria chamomilla L. (cited as Matricaria recutita) Compositae FlowersIZD = 7 ± 0 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 15 ± 10 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel. Myrtaceae Tea treeIZD = 9 ± 0.3 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Ocimum basilicum L. Lamiaceae Aerial partsIZD = 9 ± 0.3 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 8 ± 0.5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Origanum vulgare L. Lamiaceae LeavesIZD = 19 ± 4 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Pimpinella anisum L. Apiaceae AniseIZD = 12 ± 10 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Salvia sclarea L. Lamiaceae Aerial partsIZD = 10 ± 2 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 10 ± 10 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Salvia officinalis L. Lamiaceae LeavesIZD = 7 ± 0 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Sassafras officinale Siebold Lauraceae Aerial partsIZD = 7 ± 0 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Satureja montana L. Lamiaceae SavoryIZD = 25 ± 5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 13 ± 5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. and L. M. Perry Myrtaceae Buds>88% inhibition (0.3 μL/mL)[66]
Thymus vulgaris L. Lamiaceae ThymeIZD = 15 ± 5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
IZD = 12 ± 10 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Thymus zygis L. Lamiaceae Red thymeIZD = 19 ± 0.5 mm (500 µg/disc)[64]
Zataria multiflora Boiss. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 0.3 μL/mLIZD = 23.6 mm[66]

* Initial population of 8.52 ± 0.30 log10 colony forming unit (CFU)/mL reduced to 7.67 ± 0.22 log10CFU/mL; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; IZD, inhibition zone diameter.

Table 3

Plant ethanolic extracts with anti-H. pylori activity.

SpeciesFamilyPartsAnti-H. pylori PotencyRef.
Abrus cantoniensis Bge. Leguminosae Aerial partsMIC = 40 µg/mL[55]
Alepidea Amatymbica Eckl. and Zeyh Apiaceae Roots/rhizomesIZD = 6.7 ± 6.7 mm[50,51]
Amomum villosum Lour. Zingiberaceae FruitMIC = 100 µg/mL[55]
Bixa orellana L. Bixaceae SeedMIC ≤ 625–1250 μg/mL[48]
Bupleurum chinense DC. Apiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 60 µg/mL[55]
Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rauschert Compositae InflorescencesMIC ≤ 625 μg/mL[48]
Cichorium intybus L. Asteraceae RootIZD = 12 mm;MIC = 1.25–10 mg/mL[47]
Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume Lauraceae BarkIZD = 20 mm;MIC = 1.25–5 mg/mL[47]
Citrus reticulata Blanco Rutaceae Fruit shellMIC = 60 µg/mL[55]
Combretum molle R. Br. Ex G. Don Combretaceae BarkIZD = 12.9 ± 4.7 mm[50,51]
Convolvulus austro-aegyptiacu Abdallah and Saad Convolvulaceae Aerial partsMIC = 100–200 µg/mL[67]
Coriandrum sativum L. Apiaceae SeedIZD = 12 mm;MIC = 5–10 mg/mL[47]
Corydalis yanhusuo W.T. Wang Papaveraceae StemMIC = 60 µg/mL[55]
Cuminum cyminum L. Apiaceae SeedIZD = 14 mm;MIC= 0.075–0.6 mg/mL[47]
Cynara scolymus L. Asteraceae LeavesIZD = 25 mm;MIC = 0.15–0.6 mg/mL[47]
Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Maton. Zingiberaceae SeedIZD = 18 mm;MIC = 0.6–2.5 mg/mL[47]
Eugenia caryophyllata Thunb Myrtaceae FlowerMIC = 40 µg/mL[55]
Foeniculum vulgare Mill. var. dulce DC Apiaceae SeedIZD < 9 mm[47]
Fritillaria thunbergii Miq. Liliaceae StemMIC = 40 µg/mL[55]
Garcinia kola Heckel Guttiferae SeedsMIC = 0.63–5 mg/mL;IZD = 9.2 ± 7.2 mm[50,51]
Hippophae rhamnoides L. Elaeagnaceae LeavesMIC = 60 µg/mL[55]
Ilex paraguariensis A. St.-Hil. Aquifoliaceae Green leavesMIC ≤ 625–5000 μg/mL[48]
Roasted leavesMIC ≤ 625–5000 μg/mL[48]
Juniperus communis L. Cupressaceae BerryIZD = 10 mm;MIC = 1.25–10 mg/mL[47]
Ligusticum striatum DC (cited as Ligusticum chuanxiong) Apiaceae RootMIC = 60 µg/mL[55]
Lysimachia christinae Hance Primulaceae Whole plantMIC = 100 µg/mL[55]
Magnolia officinalis Rehd. et Wils. Magnoliaceae BarkMIC = 60 µg/mL[55]
Malva sylvestris L. Malvaceae Leaves and inflorescencesMIC ≤ 625–5000 μg/mL[48]
Melia azedarach L. (cited as Melia toosendan) Meliaceae FruitMIC = 100 µg/mL[55]
Mentha × piperita L. Lamiaceae LeavesIZD < 9 mm[47]
Piper longum L. Piperaceae SpikeMIC = 100 µg/mL[55]
Prunus avium L. Rosaceae PedunclesIZD = 10 mm;MIC = 1.25–10 mg/mL[47]
Rosmarinus officinalis L. Lamiaceae LeavesIZD = 20 mm;MIC = 1.25–10 mg/mL[47]
Salvia officinalis L. Lamiaceae LeavesIZD = 14 mm;MIC= 1.25–5 mg/mL[47]
Saussurea costus (Falc.) Lipsch. (cited as Saussurea lappa) Compositae RootMIC = 40 µg/mL[55]
Schisandra chinensis Baill. Schisandraceae FruitMIC = 60 µg/mL[55]
Sclerocarya birrea A. Rich Hochst Anacardiaceae Stem barkIZD = 3.3 ± 5.0 mm[50,51]
Thymus serpyllum L. Lamiaceae Aerial partsIZD = 22 mm;MIC = 1.25–10 mg/mL[47]
Tinospora sagittata Gagnep. Menispermaceae Aerial partsMIC/MBC = 6250 μg/mL[42]
Trigonella foenum-graecum L. Leguminosae SeedMIC = 40 µg/mL[55]
Zingiber officinale Roscoe Zingiberaceae RhizomeIZD = 25 mm;MIC = 0.075–0.6 mg/mL[47]

MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; IZD, inhibition zone diameter.

Table 4

Plant methanolic extracts with anti-H. pylori activity.

SpeciesFamilyPartsAnti-H. pylori PotencyRef.
Acacia nilotica (L.) Delile Leguminosae LeavesMIC = 8–128 μg/mL[49]
FlowersMIC = 8–64 μg/mL[49]
Acanthus montanus (Nees) T. Anders Acanthaceae Leaves stalkIZD = 6–22 mm (25µg/disc)[68]
Achillea millefolium L. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 1.56–100 µg/mL[69]
Adhatoda vasica Nees Acanthaceae Whole plantMIC = 64–512 μg/mL[49]
Aframomum pruinosum Gagnepain Zingiberaceae SeedMIC = 128 μg/mL[70]
Ageratum conyzoides L. Compositae Whole plantIZD = 6–22 mm (25 µg/disc);MIC = 63–1000 µg/mL;MBC = 195–12,500 µg/mL[68]
Alchemilla fissa Günther and Schummel Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 4–32 μg/mL[71]
Alchemilla glabra Neygenf. Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 4–32 μg/mL[71]
Alchemilla monticola Opiz Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 4–32 μg/mL[71]
Alchemilla viridiflora Rothm. Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 4–16 μg/mL[71]
Alchornea triplinervia (Spreng.) Müll.Arg. Euphorbiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 250 µg/mL[72]
Alepidea amatymbica Eckl. and Zeyh Apiaceae Roots/rhizomesIZD = 6.1 ± 6.4 mm[50,51]
Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd. (cited as Languas galanga) Zingiberaceae TuberIZD = 21.5 ± 1.9 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Amphipterygium adstringens (Schltdl.) Standl. Anacardiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 250 µg/mL[52]
Anoda cristata (L.) Schltdl. Malvaceae Leaves/stemMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Artemisia ludoviciana Nutt. subsp. mexicana (Willd. ex Spreng.) Fernald Compositae Leaves/stemMIC = 250 µg/mL[52]
Aulotandria kamerunensis (Loes) Zingiberaceae RhizomeIZD = 16–22 mm (25 µg/disc)[68]
Bidens pilosa L. Compositae LeavesMIC = 128–512 μg/mL[73]
Bryophyllum pinnatum (Lam.) Kurz Crassulaceae LeavesMIC = 32 μg/mL;MBC = 256 μg/mL[74]
Calandrinia ciliata (Ruiz and Pav.) DC. (cited as Calandrinia micrantha) Portulacaceae Leaves/StemMIC = 250 µg/mL[52]
Calophyllum brasiliense Cambess. Clusiaceae BarkMIC = 31 µg/mL;IZD = 7–8 mm (62.5–1000 µg/disc)[75]
Calotropis gigantea (L.) W.T. Aiton Apocynaceae LeavesIZD = 9.8 ±1.2 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Calotropis procera W.T. Aiton Apocynaceae FlowersMIC = 64–256 μg/mL[49]
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. Brassicaceae Aerial partsMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[52]
Carum carvi L. Apiaceae SeedsMIC = 100 µg/mL[69]
Casuarina equisetifolia L. Casuarinaceae FruitMIC = 128–512 μg/mL[49]
Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Apiaceae Whole plantIZD = 13.0 ± 0.9 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Chenopodium incisum Poir. (cited as Teloxys graveolens) Amaranthaceae Aerial partsMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[52]
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M. King and H. Rob. Asteraceae LeavesIZD = 25.3 ± 1.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Cistus laurifolius L. Cistaceae FlowersMIC = 62.5–125 µg/mL[54]
Colubrina asiatica (L.) Brongn. Rhamnaceae LeavesIZD = 16.3 ± 2.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Combretum molle R. Br. Ex G. Don Combretaceae BarkIZD = 13.1 ± 5.3 mm[50,51]
Cosmos caudatus Kunth Asteraceae LeavesIZD = 23.0 ± 0.9 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Cuminum cyminum L. Apiaceae SeedMIC = 100 µg/mL[69]
Curcuma longa L. Zingiberaceae Rhizome MIC = 12.5–100 µg/mL[69]
Curcuma longa L./Zingiber officinale L. Zingiberaceae Rhizome MIC = 3.125–100 µg/mL[69]
Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf Poaceae Aerial partsMIC = 31.2 µg/mL[52]
StemIZD = 28.5 ± 1.5 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Cyrtocarpa procera Kunth Anacardiaceae BarkMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[58]
Derris trifoliata Lour. Leguminosae StemIZD = 47.0 ± 0.9 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
IZD = 8.5 ± 1.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin and Clemants (cited as Teloxys ambrosioides) Amaranthaceae Aerial partsMIC = 250–500 µg/mL[52]
Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Maton. Zingiberaceae SeedMIC = 3.125-100 µg/mL[69]
Emilia coccinea (Sims) G. Don Compositae Whole plantIZD = 6–22 mm (25 µg/disc)[68]
Eryngium carlinae F. Delaroche Apiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 31.2 µg/mL[52]
Eryngium foetidium L. Apiaceae Whole plantIZD = 6–18 mm (25 µg/disc)[68]
LeavesMIC = 64–512 μg/mL[73]
Eucalyptus torelliana F. Muell. Myrtaceae Stem barkMIC = 12.5–200 µg/mL[76]
Eupatorium petiolare Moc. ex DC. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 125 µg/mL[52]
Euphorbia hirta L. Euphorbiaceae Whole plantIZD = 6–18 mm (25 µg/disc)[68]
Euphorbia umbellata (Pax) Bruyns Euphorbiaceae Bark44.6% inhibition (256 μg/mL)[77]
Fagoniaar abica L. Zygophyllaceae Whole plantMIC = 32–256 μg/mL[49]
Ficus deltoidea Jack Moraceae LeavesIZD = 12.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Foeniculum vulgare Mill. var. dulce DC Apiaceae SeedsMIC = 50–100 µg/mL[69]
Garcinia kola Heckel Guttiferae SeedsIZD = 7.1 ± 5.8 mm[50,51]
Galinsoga ciliata (Raf.) S. F. Blake Compositae LeavesMIC = 128–512 μg/mL[73]
Gentiana lutea L. Gentianaceae RootMIC = 3.125–100 µg/mL[69]
Ginkgo biloba L. Ginkgoaceae LeavesMIC = 100 µg/mL[69]
Glycyrrhiza glabra L. Leguminosae RootIDZ = 19 mm (10 mg/mL)[78]
Gnaphalium canescens DC. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[52]
Grindelia inuloides Willd. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[52]
Haplopappus spinulosus (Pursh) DC. Compositae MIC = 125 µg/mL[52]
Hesperozygis marifolia Epling Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[52]
Heterotheca inuloides Cass. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 31.25 µg/mL[52]
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. Malvaceae StemIZD = 13.7 ± 1.2 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
LeavesIZD = 14.3 ± 1.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Hippocratea celastroides HBK Hippocrateace Root barkMIC = 31.25–125 μg/mL[79]
LeavesMIC = 7.81–31.25 μg/mL[79]
StemMIC = 7.81–15.63 μg/mL[79]
Hydrastis canadensis L. Ranunculaceae RhizomeMIC = 0.78–50 µg/mL[80]
Illicium verum Hook. f. Schisandraceae FruitMIC = 50–100 µg/mL[69]
Jatropha podagrica Hook. Euphorbiaceae LeavesIZD = 8.0 ± 0.7 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
StemIZD = 9.2 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
RootIZD = 34.0 ± 2.5 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Juniperus communis L. Cupressaceae BerryMIC = 25–100 µg/mL[69]
Kaempferia galanga L. Zingiberaceae LeavesIZD = 46.0±0.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
TuberIZD = 11.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Larrea tridentata (Sessé and Moc. ex DC.) Coville Zygophyllaceae Aerial partsMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[52]
Laurus nobilis L. Lauraceae LeavesMIC = 50–100 µg/mL[69]
Lavandula angustifolia Mill. Lamiaceae FlowerMIC = 100–1000 µg/mL[69]
Limnocharis flava (L.) Buchenau Alismataceae LeavesIZD = 11.0 ±1.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Lippia graveolens Kunth (cited as Lippia berlandieri) Verbenaceae Aerial partsMIC = 31.2 µg/mL[52]
Lithraea molleoides (Vell.) Engl. Anacardiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 18–125 μg/mL[81]
Ludwigia repens J. R. Forst. Onagraceae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Lycopodium cernua (L.) Pic. Serm Lycopodiaceae Whole plantIZD = 16–22 mm (25 µg/disc;MIC = 63–250 µg/mL;MBC = 195–12500 µg/mL[68]
Machaeranthera parviflora A. Gray Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 31.2 µg/mL[52]
Machaeranthera riparia (Kunth) A.G. Jones Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[52]
Machaeranthera tanacetifolia (Kunth) Nees Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 125 µg/mL[52]
Marantodes pumilum (Blume) Kuntze (cited as Labisia pumila) Primulaceae RootIZD = 8.0 ±0.5 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Marrubium vulgare L. Lamiaceae Leaves/stemMIC = 31.2 µg/mL[52]
Melastoma malabathricum L. (blue variety) Melastomataceae LeavesIZD = 25.7 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
StemIZD = 18.0 ±0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Melissa officinalis L. Lamiaceae LeavesMIC = 100 ≥ 100 µg/mL[69]
Mentha × piperita L. Lamiaceae LeavesMIC = 25–100 µg/mL[69]
Leaves/StemMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Mimosa pudica L. Leguminosae Whole plantIZD = 14.2 ± 1.9 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Mitrasacme indica Wight (cited as Mitrasacme alsinoides) Loganiaceae LeavesIZD = 13.3 ± 2.3 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Monarda citriodora var. austromontana (Epling) B. L. Turner. (cited as Monarda austromontana) Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 125 µg/mL[52]
Moussonia deppeana (Schltdl. and Cham.) Klotzsch ex Hanst. Gesneriaceae Leaves/stemMIC = 15.6 µg/mL[52]
Myristica fragrans Houtt. Myristicaceae SeedMIC = 3.125–25 µg/mL[69]
Neptunia oleracea Lour. Leguminosae LeavesIZD = 28.3 ± 4.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Ocimum basilicum L. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 31.2 µg/mL[52]
Origanum majorana L. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 50–100 µg/mL[69]
Origanum vulgare L. Lamiaceae LeavesMIC = 100 ≥ 100 µg/mL[69]
Orthosiphon aristatus (Blume) Miq. (cited as Orthosiphon stamineus) Lamiaceae LeavesIZD = 22.0 ± 2.4 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
StemIZD = 16.0 ± 0.9 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Paeonia × suffruticosa Andrews Paeoniaceae Root CortexIZD = 17 ± 0.08 mm (1 mg/disc)[82]
Parkia speciosa Hassk. Leguminosae SeedIZD = 18.0 ± 0.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Passiflora edulis Sims (cited as Passiflora incarnata) Passifloraceae Aerial parts MIC = 50–100 µg/mL[69]
Persicaria minor (Huds.) Opiz (cited as Polygonum minus) Polygonaceae LeavesIZD = 15.5 ± 1.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Fuss Apiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 100 ≥ 100 µg/mL[69]
Phaeomeria imperialis (Roscoe) Lindl. Zingiberaceae FlowersIZD = 16.3 ± 1.4 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Phyllanthus niruri L. Phyllanthaceae Whole plantIZD = 29.7 ± 1.4 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Piper betle L. Piperaceae LeavesIZD = 23.5 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Plantago major L. Plantaginaceae Aerial partsMIC = 250 µg/mL[52]
Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 31.2 µg/mL[52]
Pluchea indica (L.) Less. Compositae LeavesIZD = 23.0 ± 1.3 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Poliomintha longiflora A. Gray Lamiaceae Leaves/stemMIC = 250 µg/mL[52]
Priva grandiflora (Ortega) Moldenke Verbenaceae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Psidium guajava L. Myrtaceae LeavesIZD = 33.0 ± 2.3 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Quercus rugosa Née Fagaceae LeavesMIC = 125 µg/mL[52]
Rosmarinus officinalis L. Lamiaceae LeavesMIC = 12.5–100 µg/mL[69]
Ruta chalepensis L. Rutaceae LeavesMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[52]
Salvia officinalis L. Lamiaceae LeavesMIC = 25–100 µg/mL[69]
Sanguinaria canadensis L. Papaveraceae RhizomeMIC = 12.5–50 µg/mL[80]
Scleria woodii var. ornata (Cherm.) J. Schultze-Motel (cited as Scleria striatonux) Cyperaceae RootIZD = 6–30 mm (25 µg/disc);MIC = 63–1000 µg/mL;MBC = 195–12,500 µg/mL[68]
Scleria verrucossa (Wild) Cyperaceae RootIZD = 4–20 mm (25 µg/disc)[68]
Sclerocarya birrea A. Rich Hochst Anacardiaceae Stem barkIZD = 3.0 ± 4.4 mm[50,51]
IZD = 17.3 ± 1.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Solanum torvum Sw. Solanaceae SeedIZD = 12.3 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Stachys setifera C. A. Mey. Lamiaceae Aerial partsIZD = 38.3 mm (8 mg/disc)[83]
Tagetes lucida Cav. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Tanacetum partshenium (L.) Sch. Bip. Compositae MIC = 62.5 µg/mL[52]
Tapeinochilos ananassae (Hassk.) K. Schum. Costaceae RhizomeIZD = 6–18 mm (25 µg/disc)[68]
Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. ex Kunth Bignoniaceae Aerial partsMIC = 500 µg/mL[52]
Tillandsia usneoides L. Bromeliaceae Aerial partsMIC = 125 µg/mL[52]
Tinospora sinensis (Lour.) Merr. (cited as Tinospora cordifolia) Menispermaceae StemIZD = 13.7 ± 2.7 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A.G. Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[52]
Verbena carolina L. Verbenaceae Aerial partsMIC = 500–1000 µg/mL[52]
Zingiber officinale Roscoe Zingiberaceae RhizomeMIC = 6.25–50 µg/mL[69]
IZD = 19.7 ± 1.5 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]

MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; MBC, minimal bactericidal concentration; IZD, inhibition zone diameter.

Table 5

Plant acetone extracts with anti-H. pylori activity.

SpeciesFamilyPartsAnti-H. pylori PotencyRef.
Acacia nilotica (L.) Delile Leguminosae LeavesMIC = 8–128 μg/mL[49]
FlowersMIC = 4–64 μg/mL[49]
Adhatoda vasica Nees Acanthaceae Whole plantMIC = 16–512 μg/mL[49]
Alepidea Amatymbica Eckl. and Zeyh Apiaceae Roots/RhizomesIZD = 7.0 ± 6.5 mm[50,51]
Bridelia micrantha (Hochst.) Baill. Phyllanthaceae BarkIZD = 16–23 mm[53]
Calotropis procera W.T. Aiton Apocynaceae LeavesMIC = 32–256 μg/mL[49]
FlowersMIC = 8–128 μg/mL[49]
Casuarina equisetifolia L. Casuarinaceae FruitMIC = 128.0–1024 μg/mL[49]
Cocculus hirsutus (L.) Diels. Menispermaceae LeavesIZD = 22–24 mm (200–1000 μg/mL)[56]
Combretum molle R. Br. Ex G. Don * Combretaceae BarkMIC50 = 0.08–1.25 mg/mL;IZD = 10.7 ± 4.7 mm;[50,51]
Desmostachya bipinnata (L.) Stapf. Gramineae Whole plantMIC = 1.3 mg/mL[84]
Fagoniaar abica L. Zygophyllaceae Whole plantMIC = 16–128 μg/mL[49]
Garcinia kola Heckel Guttiferae SeedsIZD = 8.8 ± 5.2 mm[50,51]
Sclerocarya birrea A. Rich Hochst * Anacardiaceae Stem barkMIC50 = 0.06–1.25 mg/mL;IZD = 14.7 ± 2.5 mm[50,51]

* Exhibited remarkable bactericidal activity against H. pylori, killing more than 50% of the strains within 18 h at 4× MIC and led to complete elimnation within 24 h; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; MIC50, minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 50% of cells growth; IZD, inhibition zone diameter.

Table 6

Plant chloroform extracts with anti-H. pylori activity.

SpeciesFamilyPartsAnti-H. pylori PotencyRef.
Calotropis gigantea (L.) W.T. Aiton Apocynaceae LeavesIZD = 14.0 ± 0. 9 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Cedrus libani A. Rich Pinaceae ConesMIC = 31.2 µg/mL[54]
Centaurea solstitialis L. Asteraceae Aerial partsMIC = 1.95 µg/mL[54]
Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Apiaceae Whole plantIZD = 8.2 ± 0.4 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M. King and H. Rob. Asteraceae LeavesIZD = 27.5 ± 1.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Cistus laurifolius L. Cistaceae FlowersMIC = 1.95 µg/mL[54]
Colubrina asiatica (L.) Brongn. Rhamnaceae LeavesIZD = 10.0 ± 0.9 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Cosmos caudatus Kunth Asteraceae LeavesIZD = 11.7 ± 0.5 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf Poaceae StemIZD = 18.0 ± 1.4 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Derris trifoliata Lour. Leguminosae StemIZD = 47.0 ± 1.7 mm (240 µg/disc);MIC50 = 2 mg/mLMIC90 = 4 mg/L[59]
IZD = 38.0 ± 1.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Desmos cochinchinensis Lour. Annonaceae LeavesIZD = 30.0 ± 2.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Desmostachya bipinnata (L.) Stapf. Gramineae Whole plantMIC = 5 mg/mL[84]
Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh Myrtaceae Stem barkMIC = 25–100 µg/mL[76]
LeavesMIC = 50 µg/mL[76]
Eucalyptus torelliana F. Muell. Myrtaceae LeavesMIC = 25–400 µg/mL[76]
Stem barkMIC = 50–100 µg/mL[76]
Ficus deltoidea Jack Moraceae LeavesIZD = 10.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Heterotheca inuloides Cass. Compositae LeavesIZD = 11.2 ± 1.2 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
StemIZD = 9.6 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Hypericum perforatum L. Hypericaceae Aerial partsMIC = 7.8–31.2 µg/mL[54]
Jatropha podagrica Hook. Euphorbiaceae LeavesIZD = 10.0 ± 0.5 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
RootIZD = 42.0 ± 0.5 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Kaempferia galanga L. Zingiberaceae LeavesIZD = 66.0 ± 0.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
TuberIZD = 18.3 ± 1.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd. (cited as Languas galanga) Zingiberaceae TuberIZD = 24.2 ± 1.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Limnocharis flava (L.) Buchenau Alismataceae LeavesIZD = 14.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Melastoma malabathricum L. (blue variety) Melastomataceae LeavesIZD = 22.2 ± 1.3 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
StemIZD = 7.2 ± 0.4 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Mimosa pudica L. Leguminosae Whole plantIZD = 8.8 ± 1.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Mitrasacme indica Wight (cited as Mitrasacme alsinoides) Loganiaceae LeavesIZD = 9.5 ± 1.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Momordica charantia L. Cucurbitaceae FruitsMIC = 31.2–125 µg/mL[54]
Neptunia oleracea Lour. Leguminosae LeavesIZD = 10.7 ± 2.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Orthosiphon aristatus (Blume) Miq. (cited as Orthosiphon stamineus) Lamiaceae LeavesIZD = 18.3 ± 2.2 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
StemIZD = 11.3 ± 1.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Paeonia × suffruticosa Andrews Paeoniaceae Root CortexIZD = 23.9–26.7 mm (1–10 mg/disc)[82]
Parkia speciosa Hassk. Leguminosae SeedIZD = 26.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Phaeomeria imperialis (Roscoe) Lindl. Zingiberaceae FlowersIZD = 14.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Phyllanthus niruri L. Phyllanthaceae Whole plantIZD = 9.8 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Piper betle L. Piperaceae LeavesIZD = 25.8 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Pluchea indica (L.) Less. Compositae LeavesIZD = 11.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Persicaria minor (Huds.) Opiz (cited as Polygonum minus) Polygonaceae LeavesIZD = 12.3 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Psidium guajava L. Myrtaceae LeavesIZD = 10.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Sambucus ebulus Adoxaceae Aerial partsMIC = 31.2 µg/mL[54]
Sesbania grandiflora (L.) Pers. Leguminosae LeavesIZD = 8.8 ± 1.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Solanum torvum Sw. Solanaceae SeedIZD = 8.7 ± 0.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Tinospora sinensis (Lour.) Merr. (cited as Tinospora cordifolia) Menispermaceae StemIZD = 19.2 ± 5 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Zingiber officinale Roscoe Zingiberaceae RhizomeIZD = 41.5 ± 7.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]

MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; MIC50 and MIC90, minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 50% and 90% of cells growth, respectively; IZD, inhibition zone diameter.

Table 7

Plant petroleum ether extracts with anti-H. pylori activity.

SpeciesFamilyPartsAnti-H. pylori PotencyRef.
Calotropis gigantea (L.) W.T. Aiton Apocynaceae LeavesIZD = 13.2 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Apiaceae Whole plantIZD = 8.5 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M. King and H. Rob. Asteraceae LeavesIZD = 20.3 ± 1.4 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Colubrina asiatica (L.) Brongn. Rhamnaceae LeavesIZD = 11.0 ± 0.9 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Cosmos caudatus Kunth Asteraceae LeavesIZD = 16.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf Poaceae StemIZD = 29.5 ± 1.5 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Derris trifoliata Lour. Leguminosae StemIZD = 42.0 ± 0.9 mm (240 µg/disc);MIC50 = 1 mg/mL;MIC90 = 2 mg/L[59]
IZD = 42.0 ± 1.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Desmostachya bipinnata (L.) Stapf. Gramineae Whole plantMIC = 1.5 mg/mL[84]
Ficus deltoidea Jack Moraceae LeavesIZD = 8.0 ± 0.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Heterotheca inuloides Cass. Compositae LeavesIZD = 11.5 ± 1.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
StemIZD = 13.2 ± 0.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Jatropha podagrica Hook. Euphorbiaceae LeavesIZD = 13.0 ± 1.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
StemIZD = 15.5 ± 1.4 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
RootIZD = 47.3 ± 3.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Kaempferia galanga L. Zingiberaceae LeavesIZD = 62.0 ± 0.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
TuberIZD = 18.3 ± 1.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd. (cited as Languas galanga) Zingiberaceae TuberIZD = 39.3 ± 2.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Limnocharis flava (L.) Buchenau Alismataceae LeavesIZD = 24.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Melastoma malabathricum L. (blue variety) Melastomataceae LeavesIZD = 14.0 ± 2.3 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
StemIZD = 10.5 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Mimosa pudica L. Leguminosae Whole plantIZD = 8.5 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Mitrasacme indica Wight (cited as Mitrasacme alsinoides R. Br.) Loganiaceae LeavesIZD = 11.0 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Neptunia oleracea Lour. Leguminosae LeavesIZD = 10.5 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Orthosiphon aristatus (Blume) Miq. (cited as Orthosiphon stamineus) Lamiaceae LeavesIZD = 17.7 ± 2.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
StemsIZD = 12.7 ± 0.5 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Parkia speciosa Hassk. Leguminosae SeedsIZD = 10.5 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Pereskia sacharosa Griseb. Cactaceae LeavesIZD = 13.3 ± 0.5 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Etlingera elatior (Jack) R.M.Sm. (cited as Phaeomeria imperialis) Zingiberaceae FlowersIZD = 18.0 ± 1.1 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Phyllanthus niruri L. Phyllanthaceae Whole plantIZD = 14.0 ± 1.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Piper betle L. Piperaceae LeavesIZD = 54.2 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Pluchea indica (L.) Less. Compositae LeavesIZD = 13.7 ± 1.9 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Persicaria minor (Huds.) Opiz (cited as Polygonum minus) Polygonaceae LeavesIZD = 15.5 ± 0.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Psidium guajava L. Myrtaceae LeavesIZD = 8.5 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Sesbania grandiflora (L.) Pers. Leguminosae LeavesIZD = 10.8 ± 1.0 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Solanum torvum Sw. Solanaceae SeedsIZD = 11.0 ± 0.9 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Tinospora sinensis (Lour.) Merr. (cited as Tinospora cordifolia) Menispermaceae StemsIZD = 10.7 ± 0.8 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]
Zingiber officinale Roscoe Zingiberaceae RhizomeIZD = 33.3 ± 1.6 mm (240 µg/disc)[59]

MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; MIC50, minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 50% of cells growth; IZD, inhibition zone diameter.

Table 8

Plant methanol/water, ethanol/water, methanol/petroleum, and methanol/dichloromethane extracts with anti-H. pylori activity.

SpeciesFamilyPartsAnti-H. pylori PotencyRef.
Methanol/Water (70:30, v/v)
Acacia seyal Delile Leguminoseae StemMIC = 20 mg/mL[84]
LeavesMIC = 20 mg/mL[84]
Alhagi maurorum Medik. Leguminoseae Whole plantMIC = 0.79 mg/mL[84]
Bidens bipinnata L. Compositae Whole plantMIC = 25 mg/mL[84]
Capparis spinose L. Capparaceae Aerial partsMIC = 10 mg/mL[84]
Casimiroa edulis Llave and Lex Rutaceae Unripe fruitMIC = 20 mg/mL[84]
Centaurea alexandrina Delile Compositae Whole plantMIC = 80 mg/mL[84]
Centaurea pelia DC. Compositae NDMIC = 0.625–5 mg/mL[85]
Centaurea thessala Hausskn. ssp. drakiensis (Freyn and Sint.) Georg Compositae NDMIC = 0.625–5 mg/mL[85]
Cerastium candidisimum L. Caryophyllaceae NDMIC = 0.625–2.5 mg/mL[85]
Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rauschert Compositae NDMIC = 0.625–2.5 mg/mL[85]
Cleome africana Botsch. Cleomaceae Whole plantMIC = 0.158 mg/mL[84]
Conyza albida Willd. ex Spreng. Asteraceae NDMIC = 0.625–2.5 mg/mL[85]
Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist. Asteraceae NDMIC = 0.625–2.5 mg/mL[85]
Cota palaestina Reut. ex Unger and Kotschy (cited as Anthemis melanolepis) Compositae NDMIC = 0.625–2.5 mg/mL[85]
Desmostachya bipinnata (L.) Stapf. Gramineae Whole plantMIC = 0.040 mg/mL[84]
Diplotaxis acris (Forssk.) Boiss. Cruciferae Whole plantMIC = 10 mg/mL[84]
Dittrichia viscosa (L.) Greuter subsp. revoluta Asteraceae NDMIC = 0.625–2.5 mg/mL[85]
Euphorbia retusa Forssk. Euphorbiaceae MIC = 2.5 mg/mL[84]
Glossostemon brugueiri Desf. Sterculiaceae RootMIC = 10 mg/mL[84]
LeavesMIC = 25 mg/mL[84]
Hamada elegans (Bunge) Botsch. Chenopodiaceae Whole plantMIC = 10 mg/mL[84]
Haplophyllum tuberculatum (Forssk.) A. Juss. Rutaceae Whole plantMIC = 1.58 mg/mL[84]
Lythrum salicaria L.* Lythraceae Aerial partsIZD = 17 ± 0.08 mm (500 mg/mL)[86]
Marrubium vulgare L. Lamiaceae Whole plantMIC = 0.251 mg/mL[84]
Ocimum basilicum L. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 0.625–5 mg/mL[85]
Origanum dictamnus L. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 0.625–5 mg/mL[85]
Origanum majorana L. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 0.625–5 mg/mL[85]
Origanum vulgare L. Lamiaceae LeavesMIC = 0.625–2.5 mg/mL[85]
Schouwia thebaica Webb. Brassicaceae Whole plantMIC = 25 mg/mL[84]
Sisymbrium irio L. Brassicaceae Whole plantMIC = 0.074 mg/mL[84]
Stachys alopecuros (L.) Benth. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 0.625–2.5 mg/mL[85]
Thymbra capitata (L.) Cav. (cited as Thymus capitatus) Lamiaceae Whole plantMIC = 12.5 mg/mL[84]
Trifolium alexandrinum L. Leguminosae Whole plantMIC = 25 mg/mL[84]
Ethanol/Water (70:30, v/v)
Calophyllum brasiliense Cambess. Clusiaceae BarkMIC = 31 µg/mL; IZD = 8–14 mm (62.5–1000 µg/disc)[75]
Cocculus hirsutus (L.) Diels. Menispermaceae LeavesIZD = 26 mm (200–1000 μg/mL)[56]
Fridericia chica (Bonpl.) L. G. Lohmann (cited as Arrabidaea chica) Bignoniaceae Fresh leaves12.5[87]
Hancornia speciosa Gomez Apocynaceae BarkMIC = 125 µg/mL[88]
Methanol/Petroleum (1:1)
Carum bulbocastanum (L.) Koch. Apiaceae FruitMIC = 31.25–250 µg/mL[46]
Carum carvi L. Apiaceae FruitMIC = 31.25–125 µg/mL[46]
Glycyrrhiza glabra Linn Leguminosae RootMIC = 15.6–250 µg/mL[46]
Mentha longifolia (L). Huds. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 31.25–125 µg/mL[46]
Salvia limbata C. A. Mey. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 125–250 µg/mL[46]
Salvia sclarea L. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 125–500 µg/mL[46]
Trachyspermum ammi (L.) Sprague (cited as Trachyspermum copticum) Apiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 31.25–250 µg/mL[46,89]
Xanthium strumarium subsp. brasilicum (Vell.) O. Bolòs and Vigo (cited as Xanthium brasilicum) Compositae Aerial partsMIC = 31.25–250 µg/mL[46,89]
Ziziphora clinopodioides Lam. Lamiaceae Aerial partsMIC = 31.25–125 µg/mL[46]
Methanol/Dichloromethan
Cyrtocarpa procera Kunth Anacardiaceae BarkMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[58]

* Methanol/water (80:20, v/v); ND, not defined; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; IZD, inhibition zone diameter.

Table 9

Plant cyclohexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, n-Butanol, n-Hexane, and other extracts with anti-H. pylori activity.

SpeciesFamilyPartsAnti-H. pylori PotencyRef.
Cyclohexane
Alchemilla fissa Günther and Schummel Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 64–256 μg/mL[71]
Alchemilla glabra Neygenf. Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 64–256 μg/mL[71]
Alchemilla monticola Opiz Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 8–64 μg/mL[71]
Alchemilla viridiflora Rothm. Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 64–256 μg/mL[71]
Dichloromethane
Alchemilla fissa Günther and Schummel Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 64–256 μg/mL[71]
Alchemilla glabra Neygenf. Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 64–256 μg/mL[71]
Alchemilla monticola Opiz Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 16–64 μg/mL[71]
Alchemilla viridiflora Rothm. Rosaceae Aerial partsMIC = 16–128 μg/mL[71]
Calophyllum brasiliense Cambess. Clusiaceae BarkMIC = 125 µg/mL;IZD = 7–10 mm (62.5–1000 µg/disc)[75]
Cyrtocarpa procera Kunth Anacardiaceae BarkMIC = 15.6 µg/mL[58]
Ethyl acetate
Alepidea Amatymbica Eckl. and Zeyh Apiaceae Roots/rhizomesIZD = 8.5 ± 4.8 mm[50,51]
Bidens pilosa L. Compositae LeavesMIC = 128–512 μg/mL[73]
Bridelia micrantha (Hochst.) Baill. Phyllanthaceae BarkIZD = 12–20 mm;MIC50 = 4.8–156 µg/mL;MIC90 = 4.8–2500 µg/mL[53]
Calophyllum brasiliense Cambess. Clusiaceae BarkMIC = 125 µg/mL;IZD = 7–8 mm (62.5–1000 µg/disc)[75]
Combretum molle R. Br. Ex G. Don Combretaceae BarkIZD =10.7 ± 4.7 mm[50,51]
Desmostachya bipinnata (L.) Stapf. Gramineae Whole plantMIC = 0.79 mg/mL[84]
Eryngium foetidium (Linn) Apiaceae LeavesMIC = 128–512 μg/mL[73]
Garcinia kola Heckel Guttiferae SeedsIZD = 5.1 ± 4.6 mm[50,51]
Galinsoga ciliata (Raf.) S. F. Blake Compositae LeavesMIC = 128–512 μg/mL[73]
Geranium wilfordii Maxim Geraniaceae Aerial partsMIC = 30 µg/mL[90]
Paeonia × suffruticosa Andrews Paeoniaceae Root CortexIZD = 14.1–19.9 mm (1–10 mg/disc)[82]
Physalis alkekengi L. var. franchetii (Mast.) Makino Solanaceae Aerial partsMIC = 500 μg/mL[91]
Sclerocarya birrea A. Rich Hochst Anacardiaceae Stem barkIZD = 13.2 ± 2.8 mm[50,51]
n-Butanol
Centaurea solstitialis L. subsp. solstitialis Asteraceae Aerial partsMIC = 31.2 µg/mL[54]
Cistus laurifolius L. Cistaceae FlowersMIC = 62.5–125 µg/mL[54]
Hypericum perforatum L. Hypericaceae Aerial partsMIC = 15.6–31.2 µg/mL[54]
Momordica charantia L. Cucurbitaceae FruitsMIC = 62.5 µg/mL[54]
n-Hexane
Calophylum brasiliense Cambess. Clusiaceae BarkIZD = 7–14 mm (100–400 μg/disc)[92]
IZD =7–8 mm (62.5–1000 µg/disc)[75]
IZD = 14 mm (400 mg/mL)MIC = 31 µg/mL[75]
Cyrtocarpa procera Kunth Anacardiaceae BarkMIC = 7.81 µg/mL[58]
Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh Myrtaceae Stem barkMIC = 25–200 µg/mL[76]
LeavesMIC = 50 µg/mL[76]
Eucalyptus torelliana F. Muell. Myrtaceae LeavesMIC = 25–50 µg/mL[76]
Stem barkMIC = 25–200 µg/mL[76]
Mitrella kentii (Bl.) Miq Annonaceae BarkMIC = 125 μg/mL[93]
Paeonia × suffruticosa Andrews Paeoniaceae Root CortexIZD = 29.9–31.3 mm (1–10 mg/disc)[82]
Others
Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze Theaceae Young shootsIZD = 22.5 mm (20–60 μg/disc)MBC = 4 mg/mL[94]
IZD = 18 mm (20–60 μg/disc)MBC = 5.5 mg/mL[94]
Chenopodium ambrosioides L. Amaranthaceae Aerial partsMIC = 16 mg/L *[95]

* 1 and 2 × MIC completely inhibited H. pylori growth at 24 h; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; MIC50, minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 50% of cells growth; MBC, minimal bactericidal concentration; IZD, inhibition zone diameter.

The susceptibility of H. pylori isolates and strains to 543 extracts from 246 plant species was tested by disc diffusion, agar diffusion, agar dilution, and broth microdilution assays. Activity ranged from 1.56–100,000 µg/mL for minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and 7–42 mm for inhibition zone diameters (IZDs). However, disparities were observed among the methods used and the tested concentrations: some extracts were tested at very high concentrations (100,000 µg/mL) that might have resulted in biased conclusions. Though many plants (246 species) showed anti-H. pylori activity in vitro, very few have been screened for activity in animal models. Organic extracts of Carum carvi, Xanthium brasilicum, and Trachyspermum copticum have demonstrated antibacterial activity against 10 clinical isolates of H. pylori [46]. In addition, ethanolic extracts of Cuminum cyminum and propolis exhibited significant in vitro inhibitory effect against H. pylori and, therefore, could be considered a valuable support in the treatment of infection, even contributing to the development of new and safer agents for inclusion in anti-H. pylori therapy regimens [47]. Some popular plant species used in Brazilian cuisine and folk medicine in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders were also investigated for their antibacterial effects, among which Bixa orellana, Chamomilla recutita, Ilex paraguariensis, and Malva sylvestris were the most effective against H. pylori [48]. Bioactive plant compounds were also tested for their anti-H. pylori potency (Table 10), namely those isolated from the Allium sativum (cloves), Convolvulus austro-aegyptiacu (aerial parts), Glycyrrhiza glabra (roots), Hydrastis canadensis (rhizomes), Sanguinaria canadensis (rhizomes), and Tinospora sagittata (aerial parts) species. Berberine, a benzylisoquinoline alkaloid, isolated from Hydrastis canadensis, revealed the lowest MIC value (0.78 μg/mL), being therefore considered the most effective bioactive compound, followed by diallyl tetrasulfide (3–6 μg/mL), allicin (4 μg/mL), and palmatine (3.12–6.25 μg/mL) isolated from Allium sativum and Tinospora sagittate, respectively.
Table 10

Bioactive compounds with anti-H. pylori activity.

Plant SpeciesBioactive CompoundsAnti-H. pylori Potency (MIC)Ref.
Allium sativum L. (cloves)Allicin (garlic poder)4 μg/mL[96]
Allicin6 μg/mL[96]
Diallyl disulfide100–200 μg/mL[96]
Diallyl tetrasulfide3–6 μg/mL[96]
Convolvulus austro-aegyptiacu Abdallah and Saad (aerial parts)Scopoletin50–200 µg/mL[67]
Scopolin50–100 µg/mL[67]
Glycyrrhiza glabra L. (roots)Licoricidin6.25–12.5 µg/mL[78]
Licoisoflavone6.25 µg/mL[78]
Fuscaxanthone I15.2–122.0 μM[97]
Beta-Mangostin18.3–147.3 μM[97]
Fuscaxanthone A16.3–131.2 μM[97]
Cowanin16.3–130.6 μM[97]
Cowaxanthone4.6–152.3 μg/mL[97]
Alpha-Mangostin19.0–76.1 μM[97]
Cowanol15.7–126.4 μM[97]
Isojacareubin23.9 μM[97]
Fuscaxanthone G16.3–130.6 μM[97]
Nigrolineabiphenyl B56.5–226.3 μM[97]
1,3,5,6-Tetrahydroxyxanthone29.9–240.3 μM[97]
Vokensiflavone14.4–115.7 μM[97]
Morelloflavone14.0–112.3 μM[97]
Hydrastis canadensis L. (rhizomes)Berberine0.78–25 µg/mL[80]
β-Hydrastine25–100 µg/mL[80]
Sanguinaria canadensis L. (rhizomes)Sanguinarine6.25–50 µg/mL[80]
Chelerythrine25–100 µg/mL[80]
Protopine25 ≥ 100 µg/mL[80]
Tinospora sagittata Gagnep. (aerial parts)Palmatine3.12–6.25 μg/mL[42]

MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration.

5. In Vivo Findings

H. pylori colonization is increasingly being associated with a heightened risk of developing upper gastrointestinal tract diseases. Despite many plant extracts having demonstrated a prominent H. pylori inhibition capacity in culture, it is of crucial importance to assess their in vivo efficacy, because it is pivotal to ascertain their effective antibacterial potency. However, a relatively low number of medicinal plants have been investigated to date for in vivo activity, as discussed below. Paeonia lactiflora root extract (100 µg/mL) showed a complete inhibition of H. pylori colonization (4–5 × 105 colony forming unit (CFU)), being the antibacterial potential equivalent to of ampicillin used as positive control (10 µg/mL) (2–4 × 105 CFU) [98]. Time course viability experiments were also performed in simulated gastric environments to assess the anti-H. pylori activity of garlic (Allium sativum) oil (16 and 32 µg/mL). A rapid anti-H. pylori action in artificial gastric juice was found. Nevertheless, the anti-H. pylori activity displayed by garlic oil was noticeably affected by food materials and mucin, despite the fact that a substantial activity remained under simulated gastric conditions [65]. Also, H. pylori-inoculated Swiss mice receiving 125, 250, or 500 mg/kg of Bryophyllum pinnutum or ciprofloxacin (500 mg/kg) for 7 days, showed a significant reduction of H. pylori colonization on gastric tissue from 100% to 17%. In addition, the highest B. pinnatum extract tested (85.91 ± 52.91 CFU) and standard drug ciprofloxacin (25.74 ± 16.15 CFU) also reduced significantly (p < 0.05) the bacterial load of gastric mucosa as compared with untreated infected mice (11883 ± 1831 CFU) [74]. On the other hand, Eryngium foetidum methanol extract (381.9 ± 239.5 CFU) and positive control ciprofloxacin (248 ± 153.2 CFU) significantly reduced the bacterial load in gastric mucosa at the same dose (500 mg/kg) compared with untreated and inoculated mice (14350 ± 690 CFU) [73]. Hippocratea celastroides hydroethanolic root-bark extract, a widely used plant against gastric and intestinal infections, also showed anti-H. pylori efficacy in naturally infected dogs. In a study of 18 experimental dogs treated with a dose of 93.5–500 mg/kg of H. celastroides extract in weight and 19 infected dogs receiving amoxicillinclarithromycinomeprazole (control treatment), the results showed effectiveness of 33.3 and 55% in the experimental and control groups, respectively [99]. On the other hand, Ye et al. [95], aiming to investigate the in vivo bactericidal effects of Chenopodium ambrosioides L. against H. pylori, randomly assigned H. pylori-infected mice into plant extract group, triple therapy control (lansoprazole, metronidazole, and clarithromycin), blank control, and H. pylori control groups. The obtained eradication ratios, determined by rapid urease tests (RUTs) and histopathology, were, respectively, 60% (6/10) using RUT and 50% (5/10) using histopathology for the test group and both 70% (7/10) for the control group. In addition, the histopathologic evaluation revealed a massive bacterial colonization on the gastric mucosa surface and slight mononuclear cells infiltration after H. pylori inoculation, but no obvious inflammation or other pathologic changes in gastric mucosa were stated between the C. ambrosioides-treated mice and the standard therapy. Tinospora sagittata and its main component, palmatine, showed in vitro bactericidal effects on H pylori strains, with both MIC and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) values of 6250 μg/mL, whereas palmatine’s MIC value against H. pylori SCYA201401 was 6.25 μg/mL and against H. pylori SS1 was 3.12 μg/mL. The time-kill kinetic study evidenced a dose-dependent and progressive decline in the numbers of viable bacteria up to 40 h. H. pylori-infected mice treated with extract, palmatine, or control therapy (omeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin), presented eradication ratios of, respectively, 80%, 50%, and 70%. The anti-H. pylori activity found in T. sagittata extracts and its major constituent, palmatine, both in culture and animal models, clearly highlights the antibacterial potential of this plant in the treatment of both infected humans and animals [42]. Total alkaloids fraction activity (TASA) of Sophora alopecuroides L., widely used in herbal remedies against stomach-associated diseases, were also investigated on 120 H. pylori-infected BALB/c mice mouse gastritis. A total of 100 infected mice were randomly assigned into 10 treatment groups: group I (normal saline); group II (bismuth pectin); group III (omeprazole); group IV (TASA 2 mg/day); group V (TASA 4 mg/day); group VI (TASA 5 mg/day); group VII (TASA + bismuth pectin); group VIII (TASA + omeprazole); group IX (bismuth pectin + clarithromycin + metronidazole); and group X (omeprazole + clarithromycin + metronidazole). The mice were sacrificed 4 weeks after treatment. Real-time PCR was used to detect 16sDNA of H. pylori to test both the colonization and mice clearance of bacteria of each treatment. Hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunostaining of mice gastric mucosa were also used to observe the general inflammation and related factors: IL-8, COX2, and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) expression changed after treatments. TASA combined with omeprazole or bismuth pectin showed promising antimicrobial activity against H. pylori, as well as conventional triple therapy. Indeed, hematoxylin and eosin staining and immune-staining of mice gastric mucosa evidenced that the inflammation on mice gastric mucosal membrane were also clearly relieved in TASA combined treatments and conventional triple therapy compared with normal saline-treated mice. Accordingly, from immunohistochemistry results, H. pylori-induced IL-8, COX2, and NF-κB were consistently suppressed in the seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth groups to a certain extent [100]. Pastene et al. [101] investigated the inhibitory effects of a standardized apple peel polyphenol-rich extract (Malus pumila Mill., cited as Malus domestica) against H. pylori infection and vacuolating bacterial toxin (VacA)-induced vacuolation and found that the preparation significantly prevented vacuolation in HeLa cells with an IC50 value of 390 μg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/mL and an in vitro anti-adhesive effect against H. pylori. A significant inhibition was also stated with 20–60% reduction of H. pylori attachment at concentrations between 0.250 and 5 mg GAE/mL. In a short-term infection model (C57BL6/J mice), doses of 150 and 300 mg/kg/day showed an inhibitory effect on H. pylori attachment. Orally administered apple peel polyphenols also showed an anti-inflammatory effect on H. pylori-associated gastritis, lowering malondialdehyde levels and gastritis scores. Kim et al. [102] investigated the GutGard™ ability (a flavonoid rich, Glycyrrhiza glabra root extract) to inhibit H. pylori growth both in Mongolian gerbils and C57BL/6 mouse models. Infected male Mongolian gerbils were orally treated once daily 6 times/week for 8 weeks with 15, 30, and 60 mg/kg GutGard™. Bacterial identification in the biopsy samples of gastric mucosa, via urease, catalase, and ELISA, as well as immunohistochemistry revealed a dose-dependent inhibition of H. pylori colonization in gastric mucosa by GutGard™. As well, the administration of 25 mg/kg GutGard™ in H. pylori-infected C57BL/6 mice significantly reduced H. pylori colonization in gastric mucosa, suggesting its usefulness in H. pylori infection prevention. Calophyllum brasiliense stem bark preparations are popular remedies for the treatment of chronic ulcers. A current report evidenced gastroprotective, gastric acid inhibitory properties and anti-H. pylori activity in culture (MIC = 31 µg/mL) [75]. Hydroethanolic (50, 100, and 200 mg/kg) and dichloromethane (100 and 200 mg/kg) fractions-treated Wistar rats ulcerated by acetic acid and inoculated with H. pylori, showed a marked delay in ulcer healing and reduced the ulcerated area in a dose-dependent manner [75]. While the dichloromethane fraction, at 200 mg/kg, increased PGE2 levels, both the hydroethanolic and dichloromethane fractions decreased the number of urease-positive animals, as confirmed by the reduction of the H. pylori presence in histopathological analysis. This aspect suggests that the antiulcer activity of C. brasiliense is partly linked with its anti-H. pylori efficacy [75]. Also, phenolic-rich oregano (Origanum vulgare) and cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) extracts showed a prominent ability to inhibit H. pylori through urease inhibition and disruption of energy production by inhibition of proline dehydrogenase at the plasma membrane [103].

6. Urease Inhibition

The current therapies are challenged by the considerable number of emerging H. pylori-resistant strains. This fact has driven the need for alternative anti-H. pylori therapies that ideally should have good stability and low toxicity and to be able to inhibit urease activity [62]. It has been shown that H. pylori urease activity is crucial in bacterial survival and pathogenesis [104]. The inhibitory potency of some anti-H. pylori medicinal plants has been reported [62] and even investigated by some authors in the involved mechanisms of antibacterial action of those plant products [63]. Table 11 briefly shows the studied plant extracts with prominent anti-urease activity. Amin et al. [49] demonstrated that the methanolic and acetone extracts of some medicinal plants were able to inhibit urease activity. In fact, Acacia nilotica flower methanol and acetone extracts evidenced anti-H. pylori activity, being MIC values of 8–64 μg/mL and 4–64 μg/mL, respectively. Both extracts inhibited urease activity at 8.2–88.2% and 9.2–86.6%. Calotropis procera leaf and flower methanol and acetone extracts, with MIC values of 16–256 μg/mL, 32–256 μg/mL, and 8–128 μg/mL also displayed urease inhibitory effects, being, respectively, 12.2–48.2% and 7.2–58.2% for leaf and 9.3–68.2% for flower acetone extracts [49]. While A. nilotica extract exerted a competitive inhibition, that of C. procera extract displayed a mixed type of inhibition [49]. In addition, Casuarina equisetifolia fruit methanol extract, with MIC values varying from 128–512 μg/mL, also displayed 12.2–86.2% inhibition of urease activity [49].
Table 11

Urease inhibitory potential of plant extracts.

Plant SpeciesParts Extraction SolventConcentration TestedUrease InhibitionRef.
Acacia nilotica (L.) DelileLeavesMethanol8–128 μg/mL8.21–88.21%[49]
FlowersAcetone8–128 μg/mL9.20–86.56%[49]
Calotropis procera (Aiton) W.T. AitonLeavesMethanol16–256 μg/mL12.23–48.22%[49]
LeavesAcetone32–256 μg/mL7.23–58.21%[49]
FlowersAcetone8–128 μg/mL9.33–68.21%[49]
Camellia sinensis (L.) KuntzeYoung shootsMethanol: water (62.5:37.5 v/v) non-fermented extract2.5 mg/mL100% Ure A and B[94]
Methanol: water (62.5:37.5 v/v)) semifermented extract3.5 mg/mL100% Ure A and B[94]
Casuarina equisetifolia L.FruitMethanol128–512 μg/mL12.21–86.21%[49]
Chamomilla recutita (L.) RauschertFlowersOlive oil31.25–250 mg/mLInhibited urease production[105]
Euphorbia umbellata (Pax) Bruyns BarkMethanol1024 μg/mL78.6%[77]
Peumus boldus Mol.LeavesWaterIC50 = 23.4 μg GAE/mL[61]
Teminalia chebula Retz FruitWater1–2.5 mg/mLInhibited urease activity[63]

IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration. GAE, gallic acid equivalents.

In another study, Camellia sinensis young non-fermented and semi-fermented shoot extracts, presented inhibition zone diameter (IZD) and MBC of, respectively, 22.5 mm at 20–60 μg/disk and 4 mg/mL, and 18 mm at 20–60 μg/disk and 5.5 mg/mL. They both inhibited Ure A and Ure B subunits production at 2.5 and 3.5 mg/mL [94]. Also, the Chamomilla recutita flower extract, which inhibited H. pylori growth at an MIC90 value of 125 mg/mL and a MIC50 value of 62.5 mg/mL, was able to inhibit the urease production [105]. In the same line, the methanol fraction of Euphorbia umbellata bark extract inhibited both H. pylori growth (44.6% inhibition) at 256 μg/mL and urease activity (78.6% inhibition) at 1024 μg/mL [77]. Moreover, the Peumus boldus flower aqueous extract showed anti-adherent activity against H. pylori and inhibited urease activity with an IC50 value of 23.4 μg GAE/mL [61]. The aqueous extract of Teminalia chebula fruit showed activity with MIC and MBC values of 125 mg/mL and 150 mg/mL, respectively, and inhibited H. pylori urease activity at a concentration of 1–2.5 mg/mL [63].

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Overall, the report suggests that the studied plant extracts possess anti-H. pylori activity, strengthening the claims made by traditional medicine practitioners about their putative anti-ulcerative properties. However, very few of them were investigated for efficacy in animal models or the ability to inhibit urease activity. Further studies are warranted for efficacy studies in animal models, elucidation of effective modes of action (including urease inhibition), and clinical trials in human being.
  95 in total

1.  Evaluation of antiulcer activity of chromanone fraction from Calophyllum brasiliesnse Camb.

Authors:  Larissa Maria Scalon Lemos; Thaís Bezerra Martins; Guilherme Henrique Tanajura; Vanessa Fátima Gazoni; Josiane Bonaldo; Claudia Léia Strada; Marcos Gabriel da Silva; Evandro Luiz Dall'oglio; Paulo Teixeira de Sousa Júnior; Domingos Tabajara de Oliveira Martins
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.360

2.  Anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) activity of Rubiaceae, Fabaceae and Poaceae plants: A search for new sources of useful alternative antibacterials against MRSA infections.

Authors:  M Sharifi-Rad; M Iriti; M Sharifi-Rad; S Gibbons; J Sharifi-Rad
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 1.770

Review 3.  Plants of the Melaleuca Genus as Antimicrobial Agents: From Farm to Pharmacy.

Authors:  Javad Sharifi-Rad; Bahare Salehi; Elena Maria Varoni; Farukh Sharopov; Zubaida Yousaf; Seyed Abdulmajid Ayatollahi; Farzad Kobarfard; Mehdi Sharifi-Rad; Mohammad Hossain Afdjei; Majid Sharifi-Rad; Marcello Iriti
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.878

4.  Essential oils as components of a diet-based approach to management of Helicobacter infection.

Authors:  G E Bergonzelli; D Donnicola; N Porta; I E Corthésy-Theulaz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Susceptibility of herpes simplex virus type 1 to monoterpenes thymol, carvacrol, p-cymene and essential oils of Sinapis arvensis L., Lallemantia royleana Benth. and Pulicaria vulgaris Gaertn.

Authors:  J Sharifi-Rad; B Salehi; P Schnitzler; S A Ayatollahi; F Kobarfard; M Fathi; M Eisazadeh; M Sharifi-Rad
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.770

6.  Randomized controlled trial comparing 7-day triple, 10-day sequential, and 7-day concomitant therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Ping-I Hsu; Deng-Chyang Wu; Wen-Chi Chen; Hui-Hwa Tseng; Hsien-Chung Yu; Huay-Min Wang; Sung-Shuo Kao; Kwok-Hung Lai; Angela Chen; Feng-Woei Tsay
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of plants used in Mexican traditional medicine for gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  Israel Castillo-Juárez; Violeta González; Héctor Jaime-Aguilar; Gisela Martínez; Edelmira Linares; Robert Bye; Irma Romero
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 4.360

Review 8.  Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and CagA-Positive Infections and Global Variations in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jin Young Park; David Forman; Langgeng Agung Waskito; Yoshio Yamaoka; Jean E Crabtree
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  Anti-Helicobacter pylori and urease inhibition activities of some traditional medicinal plants.

Authors:  Muhammad Amin; Farooq Anwar; Fauqia Naz; Tahir Mehmood; Nazamid Saari
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Antiulcer Agents: From Plant Extracts to Phytochemicals in Healing Promotion.

Authors:  Mehdi Sharifi-Rad; Patrick Valere Tsouh Fokou; Farukh Sharopov; Miquel Martorell; Adedayo Oluwaseun Ademiluyi; Jovana Rajkovic; Bahare Salehi; Natália Martins; Marcello Iriti; Javad Sharifi-Rad
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Applying an Ethical Framework to Herbal Medicine.

Authors:  Kate Chatfield; Bahare Salehi; Javad Sharifi-Rad; Leila Afshar
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Ethyl acetate extract of Kaempferia parviflora inhibits Helicobacter pylori-associated mammalian cell inflammation by regulating proinflammatory cytokine expression and leukocyte chemotaxis.

Authors:  Variya Nemidkanam; Yuko Kato; Tetsuo Kubota; Nuntaree Chaichanawongsaroj
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2020-04-22

3.  In Silico and In Vitro Anti-Helicobacter Pylori Effects of Combinations of Phytochemicals and Antibiotics.

Authors:  Pedro Fong; Chon-Hou Hao; Chi-Cheng Io; Pou-Io Sin; Li-Rong Meng
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Study of the Biologically Active Properties of Medicinal Plant Cotinus coggygria.

Authors:  Stanislav Sukhikh; Svetlana Noskova; Artem Pungin; Svetlana Ivanova; Liubov Skrypnik; Evgeny Chupakhin; Olga Babich
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-16

5.  Anti-Helicobacter pylori Activity of Artemisia ludoviciana subsp. mexicana and Two of Its Bioactive Components, Estafiatin and Eupatilin.

Authors:  Juan Francisco Palacios-Espinosa; Pablo Noé Núñez-Aragón; Erika Gomez-Chang; Edelmira Linares; Robert Bye; Irma Romero
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Potential Allylpyrocatechol Derivatives as Antibacterial Agent Against Oral Pathogen of S. sanguinis ATCC 10,556 and as Inhibitor of MurA Enzymes: in vitro and in silico Study.

Authors:  Dikdik Kurnia; Geofanny Sarah Hutabarat; Devi Windaryanti; Tati Herlina; Yetty Herdiyati; Mieke Hemiawati Satari
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  A botanical from the antiproliferative Cameroonian spice, Imperata cylindrica is safe at lower doses, as demonstrated by oral acute and sub-chronic toxicity screenings.

Authors:  Paul Nayim; Armelle T Mbaveng; Arsene M Ntyam; Victor Kuete
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2020-09-10

Review 8.  Myricetin bioactive effects: moving from preclinical evidence to potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Yasaman Taheri; Hafiz Ansar Rasul Suleria; Natália Martins; Oksana Sytar; Ahmet Beyatli; Balakyz Yeskaliyeva; Gulnaz Seitimova; Bahare Salehi; Prabhakar Semwal; Sakshi Painuli; Anuj Kumar; Elena Azzini; Miquel Martorell; William N Setzer; Alfred Maroyi; Javad Sharifi-Rad
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2020-08-01

Review 9.  Plants of Genus Mentha: From Farm to Food Factory.

Authors:  Bahare Salehi; Zorica Stojanović-Radić; Jelena Matejić; Farukh Sharopov; Hubert Antolak; Dorota Kręgiel; Surjit Sen; Mehdi Sharifi-Rad; Krishnendu Acharya; Razieh Sharifi-Rad; Miquel Martorell; Antoni Sureda; Natália Martins; Javad Sharifi-Rad
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-04

Review 10.  Tagetes spp. Essential Oils and Other Extracts: Chemical Characterization and Biological Activity.

Authors:  Bahare Salehi; Marco Valussi; Maria Flaviana Bezerra Morais-Braga; Joara Nalyda Pereira Carneiro; Antonio Linkoln Alves Borges Leal; Henrique Douglas Melo Coutinho; Sara Vitalini; Dorota Kręgiel; Hubert Antolak; Mehdi Sharifi-Rad; Nathália Cristina Cirone Silva; Zubaida Yousaf; Miquel Martorell; Marcello Iriti; Simone Carradori; Javad Sharifi-Rad
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.