Literature DB >> 34194657

Is the Revision Rate Higher After Hip Arthroplasty in Teenage Patients? A Prospective Study with Long-Term Follow-Up of More Than 10 Years.

Vijay C Bose1, Kanniyan Kalaivanan1, Mithun Manohar2, Ashok Kumar1, Shantanu Patil3, P Suryanarayan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) are already proven good for end-stage arthritis in the older populations but it is challenging in young teenage patients. The primary aim was to assess Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOSS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and secondary aim for implant survival rate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The details of 33 teenage patients (forty hips) who underwent HRA (21) and THA (19) at our institution (January 2002 to December 2013) with a mean follow-up period of 11.00 years (range 7.00-18.40) were included. The study group had 25 males and eight females.
RESULTS: The overall median HOOSs with interquartile range were 89.00 (87.63-0.00). The median HOOSs at follow-up were as follows: 95.00 (90.00-95.00) for symptoms, 92.00 (90.00-95.00) pain, 87.00 (85.00-90.00) for functions, 81.00 (75.00-85.00) for sports and 94.00 (88.00-95.00) for QOL. HHS improved significantly from 36.88 ± 6.14 to 90.12 ± 6.56 (p < 0.001). The HHS of HRA group improved from 36.29 ± 5.83 to 89.38 ± 5.23 and THA group improved from 37.26 ± 6.22 to 90.94 ± 7.84. The 5-year radiological follow-up X-rays did not show any radiolucent line wider than 2 mm in all three zones of the acetabulum and no progressive subsidence or migration of > 1 mm and divergent radiopaque line in femur. The Implant survival rate for HRA was 100% at 5 years, 100% at 10 years, 92% at 15 years and THA group was 100% at 5 years and 90% at 10 years.
CONCLUSION: Our study showed a disability rate of zero with improved HOSS and HHS. The overall implant survival rate was good with 100% at 5 years, 97% at 10 years and 89.9% at 15 years in contrast to the previous studies with the use of modern implants and newer standard surgical techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: A Level II study http://www.spine.org/Documents/LevelsofEvidenceFinal.pdf. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Harris Hip Score (HHS); Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS); Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA); Total hip arthroplasty (THA); Young arthroplasty patients

Year:  2021        PMID: 34194657      PMCID: PMC8192623          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00370-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  29 in total

1.  The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side.

Authors:  C A Engh; A H Glassman; K E Suthers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  R B C Treacy; C W McBryde; E Shears; P B Pynsent
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-01

3.  Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series.

Authors:  J Daniel; C Pradhan; H Ziaee; P B Pynsent; D J W McMinn
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Function and fixation of total hip arthroplasty in patients 25 years of age or younger.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; Jeremy M Oryhon; Thorsten M Seyler; Christopher W Wells; Steve S Liu; John J Callaghan; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Mid-term results for hip resurfacing in patients under 30 years old with childhood hip disorders.

Authors:  Simon MacLean; Scott Evans; Paul Pynsent; John O'hara
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.500

6.  Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients less than twenty-years.

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; Thomas Lettich; Nathan Roberts; Javad Parvizi; William J Hozack
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.500

7.  The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1,535 individuals.

Authors:  Gunnar B Flugsrud; Lars Nordsletten; Birgitte Espehaug; Leif I Havelin; Haakon E Meyer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 8.  Hip arthrodesis: a procedure for the new millennium?

Authors:  Michael D Stover; Paul E Beaulé; Joel M Matta; Jeffery W Mast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Implant survival and radiographic outcome of total hip replacement in patients less than 20 years old.

Authors:  Masako Tsukanaka; Vera Halvorsen; Lars Nordsletten; Ingvild Ø EngesæTer; Lars B EngesæTer; Anne Marie Fenstad; Stephan M Röhrl
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Head size in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georgios Tsikandylakis; Maziar Mohaddes; Peter Cnudde; Antti Eskelinen; Johan Kärrholm; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21
View more
  2 in total

1.  Outcome scores after hip surgery in young adults: an editorial approach.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Andreas Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 2.  Treatment of non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head (Review).

Authors:  Ning Liu; Changming Zheng; Qinglong Wang; Zhipeng Huang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.447

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.