Literature DB >> 20668972

Function and fixation of total hip arthroplasty in patients 25 years of age or younger.

John C Clohisy1, Jeremy M Oryhon, Thorsten M Seyler, Christopher W Wells, Steve S Liu, John J Callaghan, Michael A Mont.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of end-stage hip disease in very young patients is controversial, with advocates for nonoperative treatment, hip arthrodesis and replacement procedures. The functional improvements in this group of patients are not well documented and whether the condition for which the surgery is performed influences function. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether (1) modern THA provides major functional improvements; (2) disease-specific factors impact the magnitude of improvement; (3) these procedures are associated with early failures and complications; and (4) radiographically secure implant fixation is achieved with contemporary implants.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients (102 hips) who had THA and were 25 years or younger at surgery. The most common diagnoses were osteonecrosis (44%) and secondary osteoarthritis (41%). All patients received a cementless socket of varying designs and all except five a cementless stem. Demographic data, Harris hip score, and Charnley classification were recorded. Radiographic evaluation was used to determine implant fixation. We identified complications and failure mechanisms. The minimum followup was 2 years (median, 4.2 years; range, 2-16 years).
RESULTS: The 95 nonrevised hips were followed clinically an average of 61 months. The mean Harris hip scores improved from 42 preoperatively to 83 postoperatively. Lower Harris hip scores were associated with systemic disease (Charnley Class C). Seven hips (7%) underwent revision. There were nine (9%) major complications. One hundred percent of femoral stems and 98% of acetabular components were well-fixed at last followup.
CONCLUSION: Contemporary total hip arthroplasty in patients 25 years of age and younger is associated with improved hip function, and secure fixation of cementless implants at early followup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20668972      PMCID: PMC2974894          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1468-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  27 in total

1.  Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index.

Authors:  D Gallagher; S B Heymsfield; M Heo; S A Jebb; P R Murgatroyd; Y Sakamoto
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Joint replacement surgery in patients under thirty.

Authors:  R S Bsila; A E Inglis; C S Ranawat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G DeLee; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention.

Authors:  J Charnley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1972-02

5.  Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study.

Authors:  H P Chandler; F T Reineck; R L Wixson; J C McCarthy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Results of low friction arthroplasty in patients thirty years of age or younger.

Authors:  D K Halley; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  THA with highly cross-linked polyethylene in patients 50 years or younger.

Authors:  Derek S Shia; John C Clohisy; Mark F Schinsky; John M Martell; William J Maloney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years of age.

Authors:  Israel Dudkiewicz; Moshe Salai; Amnon Israeli; Yehuda Amit; Aharon Chechick
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.892

10.  Total hip arthroplasty in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Two to eleven-year results.

Authors:  P F Lachiewicz; B McCaskill; A Inglis; C S Ranawat; B D Rosenstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  23 in total

1.  Survivorship of hip and knee implants in pediatric and young adult populations: analysis of registry and published data.

Authors:  Art Sedrakyan; Lucas Romero; Stephen Graves; David Davidson; Richard de Steiger; Peter Lewis; Michael Solomon; Robyn Vial; Michelle Lorimer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Has total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years or younger improved? A systematic review.

Authors:  Muyibat A Adelani; James A Keeney; Allison Palisch; Susan A Fowler; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia: anatomical features and technical pitfalls].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; D Bürklein; F Greimel; U Nöth; M Hoberg; H Gollwitzer; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Alumina-on-alumina THA in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a 5-year followup study.

Authors:  Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo García-Rey; Eduardo García-Cimbrelo; Jose Ortega-Chamarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Evaluation of clinical outcomes of cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients under 30 years of age.

Authors:  Mohsen Mardani-Kivi; Mahmoud Karimi-Mobarakeh; Kamran Asadi; Keyvan Hashemi-Motlagh; Khashayar Saheb-Ekhtiari
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-09-27

6.  Long Term Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients under 30.

Authors:  Emilios E Pakos; Nikolaos K Paschos; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

7.  Is total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis as good as primary arthroplasty?

Authors:  Mariano Fernandez-Fairen; Antonio Murcia-Mazón; Ana Torres; Virginia Querales; Antonio Murcia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Short to mid-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty with cementless implants in patients younger than 25 years old.

Authors:  Hirose Shakya; Kai Zhou; Shun-Yu Yao; Suraj Dahal; Zong-Ke Zhou
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Fresh-stored osteochondral allografts for the treatment of femoral head defects: surgical technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Yona Kosashvili; Guy Raz; David Backstein; Oren Ben Lulu; Allan E Gross; Oleg Safir
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.

Authors:  Didier Hannouche; Flore Devriese; Jérôme Delambre; Frédéric Zadegan; Idriss Tourabaly; Laurent Sedel; Sylvie Chevret; Rémy Nizard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.