Literature DB >> 34181130

Experimental Validation of Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (EMRI) Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).

Giacomo Annio1, Ryo Torii2, Andrea Ducci3, Vivek Muthurangu4, Victor Tsang5, Gaetano Burriesci6,7.   

Abstract

Flow-sensitive four-dimensional Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging (4D Flow CMR) has increasingly been utilised to characterise patients' blood flow, in association with patiens' state of health and disease, even though spatial and temporal resolutions still constitute a limit. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a powerful tool that could expand these information and, if integrated with experimentally-obtained velocity fields, would enable to derive a large variety of the flow descriptors of interest. However, the accuracy of the flow parameters is highly influenced by the quality of the input data such as the anatomical model and boundary conditions typically derived from medical images including 4D Flow CMR. We previously proposed a novel approach in which 4D Flow CMR and CFD velocity fields are integrated to obtain an Enhanced 4D Flow CMR (EMRI), allowing to overcome the spatial-resolution limitation of 4D Flow CMR, and enable an accurate quantification of flow. In this paper, the proposed approach is validated in a U bend channel, an idealised model of the human aortic arch. The flow patterns were studied with 4D Flow CMR, CFD and EMRI, and compared with high resolution 2D PIV experiments obtained in pulsatile conditions. The main strengths and limitations of 4D Flow CMR and CFD were illustrated by exploiting the accuracy of PIV by comparing against PIV velocity fields. EMRI flow patterns showed a better qualitative and quantitative agreement with PIV results than the other techniques. EMRI enables to overcome the experimental limitations of MRI-based velocity measurements and the modelling simplifications of CFD, allowing an accurate prediction of complex flow patterns observed experimentally, while satisfying mass and momentum balance equations.
© 2021. Biomedical Engineering Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D Flow CMR; CFD; Cardiovascular flow; PIV; U-bend

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34181130     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02811-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  30 in total

1.  Effects of wall motion and compliance on flow patterns in the ascending aorta.

Authors:  Suo Jin; John Oshinski; Don P Giddens
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Numerical validation of MR-measurement-integrated simulation of blood flow in a cerebral aneurysm.

Authors:  Kenichi Funamoto; Yoshitsugu Suzuki; Toshiyuki Hayase; Takashi Kosugi; Haruo Isoda
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Comparison of particle image velocimetry and phase contrast MRI in a patient-specific extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection.

Authors:  Hiroumi D Kitajima; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Thomas Z Teisseyre; Garrett W Astary; W James Parks; Oskar Skrinjar; John N Oshinski; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction.

Authors:  M A Bernstein; X J Zhou; J A Polzin; K F King; A Ganin; N J Pelc; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries.

Authors:  Merih Cibis; Wouter V Potters; Frank J H Gijsen; Henk Marquering; Ed vanBavel; Antonius F W van der Steen; Aart J Nederveen; Jolanda J Wentzel
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 6.  Tools for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ramkumar Krishnamurthy; Benjamin Cheong; Raja Muthupillai
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-04

7.  Haemodynamic stress-induced breaches of the arterial intima trigger inflammation and drive atherogenesis.

Authors:  Grégory Franck; Guillaume Even; Alexandre Gautier; Manuel Salinas; Alexia Loste; Emanuele Procopio; Anh-Thu Gaston; Marion Morvan; Sébastien Dupont; Catherine Deschildre; Sophie Berissi; Jamila Laschet; Patrick Nataf; Antonino Nicoletti; Jean-Baptiste Michel; Giuseppina Caligiuri
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  3D MR flow analysis in realistic rapid-prototyping model systems of the thoracic aorta: comparison with in vivo data and computational fluid dynamics in identical vessel geometries.

Authors:  C Canstein; P Cachot; A Faust; A F Stalder; J Bock; A Frydrychowicz; J Küffer; J Hennig; M Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Loic Boussel; Vitaliy Rayz; Alastair Martin; Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton; Michael T Lawton; Randall Higashida; Wade S Smith; William L Young; David Saloner
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Computational tools for clinical support: a multi-scale compliant model for haemodynamic simulations in an aortic dissection based on multi-modal imaging data.

Authors:  Mirko Bonfanti; Stavroula Balabani; John P Greenwood; Sapna Puppala; Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam; Vanessa Díaz-Zuccarini
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  1 in total

1.  Special Issue of the VPH2020 Conference: "Virtual Physiological Human: When Models, Methods and Experiments Meet the Clinic".

Authors:  Irene E Vignon-Clementel; Dominique Chapelle; Abdul I Barakat; Aline Bel-Brunon; Philippe Moireau; Eric Vibert
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.934

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.