Literature DB >> 19161132

Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics.

Loic Boussel1, Vitaliy Rayz, Alastair Martin, Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton, Michael T Lawton, Randall Higashida, Wade S Smith, William L Young, David Saloner.   

Abstract

Evolution of intracranial aneurysms is known to be related to hemodynamic forces such as wall shear stress (WSS) and maximum shear stress (MSS). Estimation of these parameters can be performed using numerical simulations with computational fluid dynamics (CFD), but can also be directly measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a time-dependent 3D phase-contrast sequence with encoding of each of the three components of the velocity vectors (7D-MRV). To study the accuracy of 7D-MRV in estimating these parameters in vivo, in comparison with CFD, 7D-MRV and patient-specific CFD modeling was performed for 3 patients who had intracranial aneurysms. Visual and quantitative analyses of the flow pattern and distribution of velocities, MSS, and WSS were performed using the two techniques. Spearman's coefficients of correlation between the two techniques were 0.56 for the velocity field, 0.48 for MSS, and 0.59 for WSS. Visual analysis and Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement for flow pattern and velocities but large discrepancies for MSS and WSS. These results indicate that 7D-MRV can be used in vivo to measure velocity flow fields and for estimating MSS and WSS. Currently, however, this method cannot accurately quantify the latter two parameters. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19161132      PMCID: PMC3055272          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  32 in total

Review 1.  The combination of magnetic resonance angiography and computational fluid dynamics: a critical review.

Authors:  Q Long; X Y Xu; M W Collins; T M Griffith; M Bourne
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1998

Review 2.  Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI.

Authors:  Peter D Gatehouse; Jennifer Keegan; Lindsey A Crowe; Sharmeen Masood; Raad H Mohiaddin; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; David N Firmin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population.

Authors:  Meike W Vernooij; M Arfan Ikram; Hervé L Tanghe; Arnaud J P E Vincent; Albert Hofman; Gabriel P Krestin; Wiro J Niessen; Monique M B Breteler; Aad van der Lugt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity.

Authors:  Juan R Cebral; Marcelo A Castro; Sunil Appanaboyina; Christopher M Putman; Daniel Millan; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Complex hemodynamics at the apex of an arterial bifurcation induces vascular remodeling resembling cerebral aneurysm initiation.

Authors:  Hui Meng; Zhijie Wang; Yiemeng Hoi; Ling Gao; Eleni Metaxa; Daniel D Swartz; John Kolega
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) and 3D phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (PC-MRA) velocity measurements: validation in an anatomically accurate cerebral artery aneurysm model with steady flow.

Authors:  Dorothea I Hollnagel; Paul E Summers; Spyros S Kollias; Dimos Poulikakos
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Estimation of fusiform intracranial aneurysm growth by serial magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bradley P Dispensa; David A Saloner; Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton; Achal S Achrol; Lianger-der Jou; Charles E McCulloch; S Claiborne Johnston; Randall T Higashida; Christopher F Dowd; Van V Halbach; Nerissa U Ko; Michael T Lawton; Alastair J Martin; Nancy Quinnine; William L Young
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Recent advances in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  James F M Meaney; Mathias Goyen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Fluid-induced wall shear stress in anthropomorphic brain aneurysm models: MR phase-contrast study at 3 T.

Authors:  Sinyeob Ahn; Dongsuk Shin; Satoshi Tateshima; Kazuo Tanishita; Fernando Vinuela; Shantanu Sinha
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics during the growth of an unruptured aneurysm: in vitro study using longitudinal CT angiogram database.

Authors:  S Tateshima; K Tanishita; H Omura; J P Villablanca; F Vinuela
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  57 in total

1.  In vivo and in vitro validation of aortic flow quantification by time-resolved three-dimensional velocity-encoded MRI.

Authors:  Fabian Rengier; Michael Delles; Roland Unterhinninghofen; Sebastian Ley; Matthias Müller-Eschner; Sasan Partovi; Philipp Geisbüsch; Rüdiger Dillmann; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Fast 4D flow MRI re-emerges as a potential clinical tool for neuroradiology.

Authors:  P Turski; M Edjlali; C Oppenheim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Accelerated dual-venc 4D flow MRI for neurovascular applications.

Authors:  Susanne Schnell; Sameer A Ansari; Can Wu; Julio Garcia; Ian G Murphy; Ozair A Rahman; Amir A Rahsepar; Maria Aristova; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  In vivo validation of numerical prediction for turbulence intensity in an aortic coarctation.

Authors:  Amirhossein Arzani; Petter Dyverfeldt; Tino Ebbers; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Current progress in patient-specific modeling.

Authors:  Maxwell Lewis Neal; Roy Kerckhoffs
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Comparing velocity and fluid shear stress in a stenotic phantom with steady flow: phase-contrast MRI, particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Iman Khodarahmi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.

Authors:  Khalid M Saqr; Sherif Rashad; Simon Tupin; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Tamer Hassan; Teiji Tominaga; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  4D-MR flow analysis in patients after repair for tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  J Geiger; M Markl; B Jung; J Grohmann; B Stiller; M Langer; R Arnold
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Intracranial artery velocity measurement using 4D PC MRI at 3 T: comparison with transcranial ultrasound techniques and 2D PC MRI.

Authors:  Stephan Meckel; Lorenz Leitner; Leo H Bonati; Francesco Santini; Tilman Schubert; Aurelien F Stalder; Philippe Lyrer; Michael Markl; Stephan G Wetzel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  3D cine phase-contrast MRI at 3T in intracranial aneurysms compared with patient-specific computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  P van Ooij; J J Schneiders; H A Marquering; C B Majoie; E van Bavel; A J Nederveen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.