Literature DB >> 18601446

Comparison of particle image velocimetry and phase contrast MRI in a patient-specific extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection.

Hiroumi D Kitajima1, Kartik S Sundareswaran, Thomas Z Teisseyre, Garrett W Astary, W James Parks, Oskar Skrinjar, John N Oshinski, Ajit P Yoganathan.   

Abstract

Particle image velocimetry (PIV) and phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) have not been compared in complex biofluid environments. Such analysis is particularly useful to investigate flow structures in the correction of single ventricle congenital heart defects, where fluid dynamic efficiency is essential. A stereolithographic replica of an extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) is studied using PIV and PC-MRI in a steady flow loop. Volumetric two-component PIV is compared to volumetric three-component PC-MRI at various flow conditions. Similar flow structures are observed in both PIV and PC-MRI, where smooth flow dominates the extracardiac TCPC, and superior vena cava flow is preferential to the right pulmonary artery, while inferior vena cava flow is preferential to the left pulmonary artery. Where three-component velocity is available in PC-MRI studies, some helical flow in the extracardiac TCPC is observed. Vessel cross sections provide an effective means of validation for both experiments, and velocity magnitudes are of the same order. The results highlight similarities to validate flow in a complex patient-specific extracardiac TCPC. Additional information obtained by velocity in three components further describes the complexity of the flow in anatomic structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18601446     DOI: 10.1115/1.2900725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  9 in total

1.  Haemodynamic imaging of thoracic stent-grafts by computational fluid dynamics (CFD): presentation of a patient-specific method combining magnetic resonance imaging and numerical simulations.

Authors:  Marco Midulla; Ramiro Moreno; Adil Baali; Ming Chau; Anne Negre-Salvayre; Franck Nicoud; Jean-Pierre Pruvo; Stephan Haulon; Hervé Rousseau
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparing velocity and fluid shear stress in a stenotic phantom with steady flow: phase-contrast MRI, particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Iman Khodarahmi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Imaging and patient-specific simulations for the Fontan surgery: current methodologies and clinical applications.

Authors:  Diane A de Zélicourt; Alison Marsden; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Prog Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-01

4.  Modeling Left Ventricular Blood Flow Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics.

Authors:  Andrés Caballero; Wenbin Mao; Liang Liang; John Oshinski; Charles Primiano; Raymond McKay; Susheel Kodali; Wei Sun
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.495

5.  Mock circulatory system of the Fontan circulation to study respiration effects on venous flow behavior.

Authors:  Marija Vukicevic; John A Chiulli; Timothy Conover; Giancarlo Pennati; Tain Yen Hsia; Richard S Figliola
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Towards patient-specific cardiovascular modeling system using the immersed boundary technique.

Authors:  Wee-Beng Tay; Yu-Heng Tseng; Liang-Yu Lin; Wen-Yih Tseng
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  A systematic review of image segmentation methodology, used in the additive manufacture of patient-specific 3D printed models of the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  N Byrne; M Velasco Forte; A Tandon; I Valverde; T Hussain
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2016-04-29

8.  Experimental Validation of Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (EMRI) Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).

Authors:  Giacomo Annio; Ryo Torii; Andrea Ducci; Vivek Muthurangu; Victor Tsang; Gaetano Burriesci
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Rapid prototyping compliant arterial phantoms for in-vitro studies and device testing.

Authors:  Giovanni Biglino; Peter Verschueren; Raf Zegels; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.364

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.