Literature DB >> 3417701

Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis.

W N Scott1, M Rubinstein, G Scuderi.   

Abstract

From 1979 to 1984, eighty patients (119 knees) were arbitrarily selected for treatment with knee arthroplasty in which a posterior cruciate-substituting replacement was used. The average age of the forty-nine women and thirty-one men was 66.9 years (range, twenty-two to eighty-four years). Sixty-one right and fifty-eight left knees were operated on, and bilateral replacement was performed in thirty-nine of the eighty patients. The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in fifty-eight patients (eighty-eight knees), rheumatoid arthritis in fourteen patients (twenty-two knees), osteonecrosis in three patients (four knees), and traumatic arthritis secondary to a fracture of the tibia or femur in five patients (five knees). The average preoperative score on The Hospital for Special Surgery knee-rating scale was 47.5 points, and the average range of motion preoperatively was 88 degrees (range, 30 to 140 degrees). Of the 119 knees, eighty-seven had a varus alignment (maximum, 35 degrees) before knee replacement. After follow-up of two to eight years, the average score on The Hospital for Special Surgery scale was 90 points, and the average range of motion was 107 degrees. Of the 119 knees, 83 per cent were rated as excellent; 15 per cent, as good; none, as fair; and 2 per cent, as poor. Radiolucencies of one millimeter were present in 76 per cent of the knees; of two millimeters, in 7 per cent; and of three millimeters, in 3 per cent. No statistically significant correlation between radiolucencies and the clinical result was found. The results in knees of patients who had rheumatoid arthritis were not as good as those in knees of patients who had other diagnoses (F = 11.44). Our experience suggested that the posterior cruciate-substituting design provides more motion than do the cruciate-sacrificing surface-replacement designs, with no deleterious effects. The rate of infection (1.6 per cent) after these procedures, which were carried out in a standard operating theater with vertical airflow, was equivalent to that in other published series in which rooms with laminar airflow were used. Patients who had a bilateral procedure did as well as those who had a unilateral replacement, but they required approximately 3.5 more units of blood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3417701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  20 in total

1.  Posterior cruciate ligament function following total knee arthroplasty: the effect of joint line elevation.

Authors:  G J Emodi; J J Callaghan; D R Pedersen; T D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1999

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique.

Authors:  Lars Perlick; Holger Bäthis; Carsten Perlick; Christian Lüring; Markus Tingart; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine?

Authors:  Markus Tingart; Christian Lüring; Holger Bäthis; Johannes Beckmann; Joachim Grifka; Lars Perlick
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James B Stiehl; Karel J Hamelynck; Paul E Voorhorst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Posteriorly stabilised (Insall-Burstein) total condylar knee arthroplasty. A follow-up study of 157 knees.

Authors:  D V Patel; P M Aichroth; J S Wand
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Sagittal cutting error changes femoral anteroposterior sizing in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nakahara; Shuichi Matsuda; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded study on early rehabilitation.

Authors:  Holger Bäthis; Lars Perlick; Christian Blum; Christian Lüring; Carsten Perlick; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Arthroscopy in patients with knee endoprostheses.

Authors:  J Jerosch; M Schröder; J Steinbeck; H Halm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The INDUS knee prosthesis - Prospective multicentric trial of a posteriorly stabilized high-flex design: 2 years follow-up.

Authors:  Kantilal H Sancheti; Nandu S Laud; Harish Bhende; Gurava Reddy; Neema Pramod; Joseph N Mani
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  NexGen LPS rotating platform total knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Roberto Rossi; Andrea Ferro; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Giacomo Garzaro; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.