Literature DB >> 15650890

Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded study on early rehabilitation.

Holger Bäthis1, Lars Perlick, Christian Blum, Christian Lüring, Carsten Perlick, Joachim Grifka.   

Abstract

The medial parapatellar approach has become the standard technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, recent studies have reported superior results regarding functional recovery when using the midvastus approach. It was the aim of this study to evaluate the early functional outcome of both surgical techniques. In a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, 50 patients for TKA were consecutively operated on either by the medial parapatellar or the midvastus approach. Exclusion criteria were defined as previous open knee surgery and leg deformity of more than 10 degrees varus or valgus. TKA was performed in all patients by one surgeon using the same type of implants in both groups. Pain scores (VAS) were documented and follow-up data including quadriceps strength and proprioception were obtained 3 weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively. Both groups were comparable in preoperative demographic data. Postoperatively, patients in the midvastus group demonstrated significantly lower pain in rest (VAS: mean 2.25 vs. 3.03) and under movement (VAS: mean 2.92 vs. 3.13). Further, they showed superior isometric quadriceps strength at 3 weeks (41.4 vs. 27.6 Nm) and 6 weeks (47.6 vs. 35.5 Nm). Moreover, this group showed a superior postoperative proprioception, while the range of motion was similar in both groups. The midvastus approach offers advantages over the standard parapatellar arthrotomy, in the early rehabilitation period. No adverse effects were observed associated with this approach. Therefore, the midvastus approach should be considered as a valuable alternative in TKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15650890     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0574-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  27 in total

1.  A comparison of the vastus splitting and median parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M A Parentis; M N Rumi; G S Deol; M Kothari; W M Parrish; V D Pellegrini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial.

Authors:  G S Roysam; M J Oakley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention.

Authors:  Stephen R Lord; Hylton B Menz; Anne Tiedemann
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2003-03

4.  A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D F Dalury; W A Jiranek
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Surgical interruption of patellar blood supply by total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D E Kayler; D Lyttle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty: a description and a cadaveric study determining the distance of the popliteal artery from the patellar margin of the incision.

Authors:  R E Cooper; G Trinidad; W R Buck
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis.

Authors:  W N Scott; M Rubinstein; G Scuderi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  The patellofemoral component of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G W Brick; R D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Alternate surgical approaches in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter A Keblish
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  The medial trivector approach in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D A Fisher; S M Trimble; K Breedlove
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of the minimally invasive and standard medial parapatellar approaches for primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  I Alcelik; M Sukeik; R Pollock; A Misra; P Shah; P Armstrong; M I Dhebar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [The mini-midvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Robert Hube; Manuel Keim; Hermann Otto Mayr
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  The mini-incision mid-vastus approach for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Flören; Heiko Reichel; Jack Davis; Richard S Laskin
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Better quadriceps recovery after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kye-Youl Cho; Kang-Il Kim; Salil Umrani; Se-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Hypesthesia after anterolateral versus midline skin incision in TKA: a randomized study.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Laffosse; Anna Potapov; Michel Malo; Martin Lavigne; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty improves early knee strength but not functional performance: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Michael J Bade; Benjamin C Shulman; Wendy M Kohrt; Michael R Dayton
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: does it correlate with patellar blood flow?

Authors:  Sandro Kohl; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; Maximilian Hartel; Hendrik Kohlhof; Christoph Roeder; Stefan Eggli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  [Pain therapy for the lower extremities].

Authors:  C J P Simanski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Anterolateral approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy versus standard medial approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: does it matter?

Authors:  Michael T Hirschmann; Mathias Hoffmann; Robert Krause; Reza-Amir Jenabzadeh; Markus P Arnold; Niklaus F Friederich
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Current perspectives in stem cell research for knee cartilage repair.

Authors:  Patrick Orth; Ana Rey-Rico; Jagadeesh K Venkatesan; Henning Madry; Magali Cucchiarini
Journal:  Stem Cells Cloning       Date:  2014-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.