Literature DB >> 3416522

The anatomic basis of femoral component design.

P C Noble1, J W Alexander, L J Lindahl, D T Yew, W M Granberry, H S Tullos.   

Abstract

The shape of the femoral canal is variable, much more variable, in fact, than most contemporary designs of femoral components would suggest or can accommodate. In the face of this variability, line-to-line or surface-to-surface contact is not expected between cementless implants and much of the endosteal surface. It also is apparent that changes in implant design are still needed if the normal biomechanics of the hip joint are to be restored in each patient and if component fixation is to be optimized. Most cementless components aim to achieve proximal load transfer to the femoral canal. However, increasing clinical evidence suggests that distal filling of the femur also is necessary to minimize the incidence of postoperative symptoms, particularly in revision procedures. If this is indeed the case, more accommodating designs of femoral components are needed that will enable proximal and distal fitting at the femoral canal so that stable fixation may be achieved regardless of variations in bone geometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3416522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  119 in total

1.  The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Li-dong Wu; H J Hahne; J Hassenpflug
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci       Date:  2004-10

2.  [Primary rotatory stability of robot-assisted and manually implanted hip endoprosthesis stems].

Authors:  M Prymka; M Vogiatzis; J Hassenpflug
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Excellent results with cementless total hip arthroplasty and alumina-on-alumina pairing: minimum ten-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alexander M Kress; Rainer Schmidt; Ulrich Holzwarth; Raimund Forst; Lutz A Mueller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Radiograph-based femur morphing method.

Authors:  E M Zanetti; V Crupi; C Bignardi; P M Calderale
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  [Cementless stems of the hip. Current status].

Authors:  H Effenberger; M Imhof; U Witzel; S Rehart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  The comparison of femoral curves and curves of contemporary intramedullary nails.

Authors:  Ahmet Harma; Burak Germen; Hakki Muammer Karakas; Nurzat Elmali; Muharrem Inan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Does the surgical approach influence the implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty? Comparative study between the direct anterior and the anterolateral approaches in the supine position.

Authors:  Yuya Kawarai; Satoshi Iida; Junichi Nakamura; Yoshiyuki Shinada; Chiho Suzuki; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Radiographic study of the proximal femur morphology of elderly patients with femoral neck fractures: is there a difference among ethnic groups?

Authors:  Zhi Hao Tang; Ching Sing Nicholas Yeoh; Gek Meng Jeffrey Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 1.858

10.  The effect on bone growth enhancement of implant coatings with hydroxyapatite and collagen deposited electrochemically and by plasma spray.

Authors:  Henrik Daugaard; Brian Elmengaard; Joan E Bechtold; Thomas Jensen; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.