Literature DB >> 34154323

Dph3 Enables Aerobic Diphthamide Biosynthesis by Donating One Iron Atom to Transform a [3Fe-4S] to a [4Fe-4S] Cluster in Dph1-Dph2.

Yugang Zhang1, Dan Su1, Boris Dzikovski1, Sean H Majer1, Rachael Coleman1, Siddarth Chandrasekaran1, Michael K Fenwick1, Brian R Crane1, Kyle M Lancaster1, Jack H Freed1, Hening Lin1,2.   

Abstract

All radical S-adenosylmethionine (radical-SAM) enzymes, including the noncanonical radical-SAM enzyme diphthamide biosynthetic enzyme Dph1-Dph2, require at least one [4Fe-4S](Cys)3 cluster for activity. It is well-known in the radical-SAM enzyme community that the [4Fe-4S](Cys)3 cluster is extremely air-sensitive and requires strict anaerobic conditions to reconstitute activity in vitro. Thus, how such enzymes function in vivo in the presence of oxygen in aerobic organisms is an interesting question. Working on yeast Dph1-Dph2, we found that consistent with the known oxygen sensitivity, the [4Fe-4S] cluster is easily degraded into a [3Fe-4S] cluster. Remarkably, the small iron-containing protein Dph3 donates one Fe atom to convert the [3Fe-4S] cluster in Dph1-Dph2 to a functional [4Fe-4S] cluster during the radical-SAM enzyme catalytic cycle. This mechanism to maintain radical-SAM enzyme activity in aerobic environments is likely general, and Dph3-like proteins may exist to keep other radical-SAM enzymes functional in aerobic environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34154323      PMCID: PMC8251694          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c03956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


Radical S-adenosylmethionine (radical-SAM) enzymes are found in all domains of life.[1] They utilize a [4Fe–4S] cluster and SAM to initiate a diverse set of radical reactions.[2] In the active site, radical-SAM enzymes contain a [4Fe–4S] cluster in which three of the four iron atoms are coordinated by cysteines and the fourth iron is coordinated by SAM.[2] In the absence of SAM, the fourth iron in the [4Fe–4S] cluster is not coordinated, rendering it prone to oxidation.[2] In most cases, a brief exposure of a radical-SAM enzyme to air leads to the formation of an inactive [3Fe–4S] cluster through the loss of the fourth iron.[2,3] The instability of the [4Fe–4S] cluster in air leads to the question how such an unstable cluster could function well in aerobes.[3] The Dph1–Dph2 heterodimer is a noncanonical radical-SAM enzyme in eukaryotes that is essential for the first step of biosynthesis of diphthamide.[4,5] Diphthamide is a unique post-translationally modified histidine residue on eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2), a GTPase that is essential in the elongation step of translation.[6−10] The diphthamide biosynthesis in eukaryotes requires four steps involving at least seven proteins.[9,11] The Dph1–Dph2 heterodimer catalyzes the addition of an aminocarboxypropyl (ACP) group to a specific histidine residue in eEF2 using SAM as a substrate (Figure A,B).[5] During the in vitro enzymatic reaction, the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster in Dph1–Dph2 is reduced to [4Fe–4S]1+ using dithionite as the reductant.[12] The [4Fe–4S]1+ cluster donates two electrons to SAM, cleaving it, forming an organometallic complex (intermediate I) and releasing methylthioadenosine (Figure A).[13] The organometallic intermediate serves as a stabilized ACP radical and reacts with eEF2 to form intermediate II, which is converted to the ACP-modified eEF2 product after loss of a hydrogen atom (Figure A).[10,13]
Figure 1

An old batch of Dph1–Dph2 required Dph3/Cbr1/NADH but not dithionite for activity. (A) Reaction mechanism for the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis. Intermediate I is organometallic in nature. (B) Scheme showing the in vitro reconstitution of the Dph1–Dph2 enzymatic reaction. Dph1–Dph2 catalyzes the addition of the ACP group to histidine using SAM as the substrate. eEF2 incorporates 14C-modified ACP when carboxy-14C-SAM is used as the substrate. (C) In vitro reconstitution of the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis on eEF2 with Dph1–Dph2 and carboxy-14C-SAM using Dph3/Cbr1/NADH (left four lanes) or dithionite (right four lanes) as the reducing agent: (top) autoradiography showing labeled eEF2 product; (bottom) eEF2 stained with Coomassie blue (CBB).

An old batch of Dph1–Dph2 required Dph3/Cbr1/NADH but not dithionite for activity. (A) Reaction mechanism for the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis. Intermediate I is organometallic in nature. (B) Scheme showing the in vitro reconstitution of the Dph1–Dph2 enzymatic reaction. Dph1–Dph2 catalyzes the addition of the ACP group to histidine using SAM as the substrate. eEF2 incorporates 14C-modified ACP when carboxy-14C-SAM is used as the substrate. (C) In vitro reconstitution of the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis on eEF2 with Dph1–Dph2 and carboxy-14C-SAM using Dph3/Cbr1/NADH (left four lanes) or dithionite (right four lanes) as the reducing agent: (top) autoradiography showing labeled eEF2 product; (bottom) eEF2 stained with Coomassie blue (CBB). Under physiological conditions, the reduction of the [4Fe–4S] clusters in Dph1–Dph2 requires Dph3 and Cbr1.[14,15] Dph3 contains a zinc finger domain that binds one iron with four cysteine residues.[16] The iron in Dph3 is redox-active and can be reduced by FAD-bound Cbr1 with NADH in baker’s yeast.[14,15] In yeast and other aerobic eukaryotes, Dph1–Dph2, Dph3, and Cbr1 reside in the cytosol, a hostile environment for oxygen-sensitive radical-SAM enzymes.[17] How the first step in diphthamide biosynthesis happens in yeast in the presence of oxygen is an interesting question. Although Dph3 and Cbr1 may be able to reduce the [4Fe–4S] cluster in Dph1–Dph2, maintaining the [4Fe–4S] cluster in Dph1–Dph2 would be challenging given that in vitro the [4Fe–4S] cluster is quickly degraded to [3Fe–4S], a common property for all radical-SAM enzyme Fe–S clusters. Here we propose a model in which Dph1–Dph2 maintains a [3Fe–4S] cluster and Dph3 provides the fourth Fe during the enzymatic reaction to form the active [4Fe–4S] cluster in situ to catalyze the reaction. This strategy nicely solves the oxygen-sensitivity problem of Dph1–Dph2 radical-SAM enzyme and may be generally used to allow radical-SAM enzymes to function in aerobic environments. In an attempt to reconstitute the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis, we found that an old batch of anaerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 functions only with the physiological reducing system,[15] Dph3/Cbr1/NADH, and not with the small-molecule reductant dithionite (Figure C). Dithionite is generally used for in vitro reconstitution of radical-SAM enzymes. Dithionite reduces [4Fe–4S]2+ into [4Fe–4S]1+, thus forming the active Fe–S cluster. Activation of both Dph1–Dph2 and the archaeal homologue PhDph2 by dithionite was achieved experimentally previously.[4,5] The observation that this particular batch of Dph1–Dph2 could be activated with Dph3/Cbr1/NADH but not with dithionite led us to hypothesize that the [4Fe–4S] cluster in Dph1–Dph2 was decomposed to the [3Fe–4S] cluster as a result of accidental exposure to oxygen, rendering dithionite unable to activate it. However, Dph3/Cbr1/NADH could provide the fourth Fe to reconstitute the active [4Fe–4S] cluster. To test the hypothesis, we purified a batch of Dph1–Dph2 aerobically. The aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 showed little activity with dithionite but showed much higher activity with Dph3/Cbr1/NADH (Figure A). In contrast, Dph1–Dph2 purified anaerobically showed higher activity with dithionite than with Dph3/Cbr1/NADH (Figure B). In line with the in vitro reconstitution results, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy showed that aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 contains mostly [3Fe–4S]1+ and after dithionite reduction produces very little [4Fe–4S]1+ EPR signal (Figure C). In contrast, the anaerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 contained very little [3Fe–4S]1+ signal and produced a strong [4Fe–4S]1+ signal after dithionite reduction (Figure D). For the anaerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 containing mostly the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster, dithionite can better reduce the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster because of its lower reduction potential compared with Dph3/Cbr1/NADH, explaining why the reaction worked better with dithionite in the case of anaerobically purified Dph1–Dph2.
Figure 2

Dph3 activates aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2. (A) In vitro reconstitution of the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis with aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2. The reaction was carried out aerobically. The reaction time is labeled on the right. (B) In vitro reconstitution of the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis with anaerobically purified Dph1–Dph2. The reaction was carried out anaerobically. The reaction time is labeled on the right. For the reaction with dithionite, Dph1–Dph2 was mixed with eEF2 and carboxy-14C-SAM, and dithionite was added to initiate the reaction. For the reaction with Dph3/Cbr1/NADH, Dph1–Dph2 was mixed with Dph3, Cbr1, eEF2, and carboxy-14C-SAM. NADH was added to initiate the reaction. (top) Autoradiography showing labeled eEF2 product. (bottom) eEF2 stained with Coomassie blue (CBB). (C) X-band continuous wave (CW) EPR signal of aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 with or without dithionite obtained at 12 K. (D) X-band CW EPR signal of anaerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 with or without dithionite obtained at 12 K. The quantification of Fe–S cluster species is included in Supplementary Table 1.

Dph3 activates aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2. (A) In vitro reconstitution of the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis with aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2. The reaction was carried out aerobically. The reaction time is labeled on the right. (B) In vitro reconstitution of the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis with anaerobically purified Dph1–Dph2. The reaction was carried out anaerobically. The reaction time is labeled on the right. For the reaction with dithionite, Dph1–Dph2 was mixed with eEF2 and carboxy-14C-SAM, and dithionite was added to initiate the reaction. For the reaction with Dph3/Cbr1/NADH, Dph1–Dph2 was mixed with Dph3, Cbr1, eEF2, and carboxy-14C-SAM. NADH was added to initiate the reaction. (top) Autoradiography showing labeled eEF2 product. (bottom) eEF2 stained with Coomassie blue (CBB). (C) X-band continuous wave (CW) EPR signal of aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 with or without dithionite obtained at 12 K. (D) X-band CW EPR signal of anaerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 with or without dithionite obtained at 12 K. The quantification of Fe–S cluster species is included in Supplementary Table 1. The above data confirmed that the aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 containing mostly [3Fe–4S]1+ shows high activity with Dph3/Cbr1/NADH but little to no activity with dithionite. Thus, the Dph3/Cbr1/NADH system is able to provide the fourth Fe to reconstitute the active [4Fe–4S] cluster needed for the enzymatic activity. The next question concerns the origin of the fourth Fe. Because Dph3 binds one Fe ion using four cysteine residues, we reasoned that this Dph3-bound Fe could be transferred to Dph1–Dph2 to reconstitute the [4Fe–4S] cluster from the [3Fe–4S] cluster. The possibility that the fourth iron comes from adventitious Fe ions in the solution is unlikely, as the dithionite-reduced aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 could not form the [4Fe–4S] cluster (Figure B). To further rule out the possibility that the fourth Fe is from adventitious Fe in the solution, we used citrate to limit the free iron in the solution.[18,19] The activity of aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 with Dph3/Cbr1/NADH remained intact supporting the hypothesis that the fourth Fe is not from adventitious iron in the reaction mixture (Figure A).
Figure 3

Dph3 provides the unique Fe to complete the [4Fe–4S] cluster during the reaction. (A) The activity of aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 with Dph3 is not affected by citrate, as shown by in vitro reconstitution of the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis on eEF2 using aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2, carboxy-14C-SAM, Cbr1, NADH and Dph3 in the presence or absence of 2 mM citrate: (top) autoradiography showing labeled eEF2 product; (bottom) eEF2 stained with Coomassie blue (CBB). (B) Dph1–Dph2, Dph3, eEF2, Cbr1, and NADH were mixed at room temperature and subjected to rapid freeze quench (RFQ) at 2 s. The quenched reaction mixture was monitored using X-band CW EPR spectroscopy at 35 K in the region of 3100 to 3500 G. (C) The quenched reaction mixture (2 s) was monitored using X-band CW EPR spectroscopy at 12 K in the region of 1400 to 1700 G to detect the Dph3 Fe signal. The spectrum was compared to the reaction mixture before addition of NADH (0 s). (D) Intermediate I structure with (left) 56Fe or (right)57Fe at the unique iron position. (E) Dph1–Dph2 (with 56Fe), 57Fe-Dph3, eEF2, Cbr1, SAM, and NADH were mixed at room temperature and subjected to RFQ at 2 s. The quenched reaction mixture was monitored using X-band CW EPR spectroscopy at 12 K. The EPR signal was aligned to that obtained with 56Fe-Dph3. A 5.9 G line broadening was observed with 57Fe-Dph3, indicating the incorporation of 57Fe from Dph3 into the intermediate I signal.

Dph3 provides the unique Fe to complete the [4Fe–4S] cluster during the reaction. (A) The activity of aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 with Dph3 is not affected by citrate, as shown by in vitro reconstitution of the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis on eEF2 using aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2, carboxy-14C-SAM, Cbr1, NADH and Dph3 in the presence or absence of 2 mM citrate: (top) autoradiography showing labeled eEF2 product; (bottom) eEF2 stained with Coomassie blue (CBB). (B) Dph1–Dph2, Dph3, eEF2, Cbr1, and NADH were mixed at room temperature and subjected to rapid freeze quench (RFQ) at 2 s. The quenched reaction mixture was monitored using X-band CW EPR spectroscopy at 35 K in the region of 3100 to 3500 G. (C) The quenched reaction mixture (2 s) was monitored using X-band CW EPR spectroscopy at 12 K in the region of 1400 to 1700 G to detect the Dph3 Fe signal. The spectrum was compared to the reaction mixture before addition of NADH (0 s). (D) Intermediate I structure with (left) 56Fe or (right)57Fe at the unique iron position. (E) Dph1–Dph2 (with 56Fe), 57Fe-Dph3, eEF2, Cbr1, SAM, and NADH were mixed at room temperature and subjected to RFQ at 2 s. The quenched reaction mixture was monitored using X-band CW EPR spectroscopy at 12 K. The EPR signal was aligned to that obtained with 56Fe-Dph3. A 5.9 G line broadening was observed with 57Fe-Dph3, indicating the incorporation of 57Fe from Dph3 into the intermediate I signal. To further confirm that Dph3 provides the fourth Fe to reconstitute the [4Fe–4S] cluster in Dph1–Dph2, we sought to detect the [4Fe–4S]1+ cluster signal by EPR spectroscopy. Interestingly, in the solution with Dph1–Dph2 and Dph3/Cbr1/NADH but without the substrates (eEF2 and SAM), we could not detect the [4Fe–4S]1+ EPR signal (data not shown). We hypothesized that the [4Fe–4S]1+ cluster is formed only when both of the substrates (eEF2 and SAM) are present, which then quickly react to form products. Thus, to detect any potential [4Fe–4S] cluster EPR signal during the reaction, we performed rapid freeze quench (RFQ). Previously, two intermediates, organometallic intermediate I and organic radical intermediate II, were captured and characterized (Figure A).[13] If our hypothesis that Dph3 provides the fourth iron to reconstitute the active [4Fe–4S] cluster in Dph1–Dph2 is true, we should be able capture and detect either the [4Fe–4S]1+ signal or the intermediate I signal by RFQ. Aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 was mixed with Dph3, eEF2, SAM, and a catalytic amount of Cbr1. The reaction was triggered by mixing the protein mixture with NADH and then quenched at 2 s, and the reaction mixture was analyzed by EPR spectroscopy. The intermediate I signal was successfully detected (Figure B), indicating that the [4Fe–4S]1+ cluster was formed during the reaction and then quickly converted to intermediate I[13] (Figure ). At the same time, there was a fast decrease in the Fe3+ signal in Dph3 (Figure C). The disappearance of the Fe3+ signal is mostly due to reduction to Fe2+ in Dph3 right after NADH addition.
Figure 4

Proposed mechanism for the Dph1–Dph2 reaction with Dph3 donating the fourth Fe for the [4Fe–4S] cluster. The aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 contains a [3Fe–4S]1+ cluster. The [3Fe–4S]1+ cluster is reduced to [3Fe–4S]0 in the presence of Dph3/Cbr1/NADH. When both eEF2 and SAM are present, Fe2+ from Dph3 is transferred to Dph1–Dph2, forming the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster, which at the same time is reduced by Dph3/Cbr1/NADH. The [4Fe–4S]1+ cluster then forms intermediate I, which eventually leads to the final product, ACP-modified eEF2.

Proposed mechanism for the Dph1–Dph2 reaction with Dph3 donating the fourth Fe for the [4Fe–4S] cluster. The aerobically purified Dph1–Dph2 contains a [3Fe–4S]1+ cluster. The [3Fe–4S]1+ cluster is reduced to [3Fe–4S]0 in the presence of Dph3/Cbr1/NADH. When both eEF2 and SAM are present, Fe2+ from Dph3 is transferred to Dph1–Dph2, forming the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster, which at the same time is reduced by Dph3/Cbr1/NADH. The [4Fe–4S]1+ cluster then forms intermediate I, which eventually leads to the final product, ACP-modified eEF2. To further confirm that Dph3 is the source of the unique iron in intermediate I, we obtained 57Fe-labeled Dph3. If the 57Fe is transferred during the reaction, we should observe line broadening of the intermediate I signal.[13] We performed the same RFQ experiment with 57Fe-labeled Dph3, and indeed, we saw a 5.9 G line broadening of the intermediate I signal (Figure D,E). The line broadening effect is similar to what we observed previously[13] and falls within the range of 57Fe hyperfine coupling.[20,21] This result further supports the conclusion that the unique iron essential for the reaction is obtained from Dph3 during the reaction. Thus, Dph3 enables the radical-SAM enzyme Dph1–Dph2 to function aerobically. Dph1–Dph2 in the resting state exists in [3Fe–4S] form. During the reaction, Dph3 transfers an iron to Dph1–Dph2 to reconstitute the [4Fe–4S] cluster in situ. At the same time, Dph3/Cbr1/NADH provides an electron to reduce the 4Fe–4S cluster.[5] The reformed [4Fe–4S]1+ cluster cleaves SAM and forms intermediate I (Figure ). When Dph1–Dph2 is purified anaerobically, Dph1–Dph2 contains the full [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster.[5] Dph3 mediated the electron transfer to reduce [4Fe–4S]1+ and trigger the reaction.[5] When Dph1–Dph2 is purified aerobically, Dph1–Dph2 contains the [3Fe–4S]1+ cluster. In this system, Dph3 has two functions: it mediates the electron transfer and transfers Fe to reform the active [4Fe–4S]1+ cluster to trigger the reaction. Our current model reveals the additional function of Dph3 to complete the [4Fe–4S] cluster along with its ability to mediate the electron transfer. The detailed mechanism of electron transfer mediated by Dph3 is still under investigation. Our model reveals an elegant solution that nature uses to allow Dph1–Dph2 radical-SAM enzymes to function aerobically. The [4Fe–4S] cluster is not stable in the presence of oxygen, while the [3Fe–4S] cluster in Dph1–Dph2 and the Fe bound by Dph3 are both stable. Furthermore, the reconstitution of the active [4Fe–4S] cluster occurs only when both substrates (eEF2 and SAM) are present, which allows maximum efficiency of the system (if the active cluster were formed when eEF2 or SAM is not present, it would be quickly destroyed by oxygen and thus wasted). This is likely a general solution that aerobes use to cope with the oxygen-sensitivity problem of radical-SAM enzymes, allowing oxygen-sensitive Fe–S enzymes to function in an aerobic environment. In yeast and humans, there are other radical-SAM enzymes that function in the cytosol,[22] including tRNA wybutosine-synthesizing protein (Tyw1),[23] the elongator complex,[24,25] viperin,[26−28] and molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis protein 1 (MOCS1).[29] These radical-SAM enzymes are also oxygen-sensitive, and thus, they may also require proteins like Dph3 to help to keep them active in an aerobic environment.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Iron-sulphur clusters and the problem with oxygen.

Authors:  James A Imlay
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  Investigation of exchange couplings in [Fe3S4]+ clusters by electron spin-lattice relaxation.

Authors:  J Telser; H I Lee; B M Hoffman
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  YBR246W is required for the third step of diphthamide biosynthesis.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Su; Wei Chen; Wankyu Lee; Hong Jiang; Sheng Zhang; Hening Lin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Solution structure of Kti11p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a novel zinc-binding module.

Authors:  Jianping Sun; Jiahai Zhang; Fangming Wu; Chao Xu; Shujun Li; Wei Zhao; Ziyu Wu; Jihui Wu; Cong-Zhao Zhou; Yunyu Shi
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Radical SAM, a novel protein superfamily linking unresolved steps in familiar biosynthetic pathways with radical mechanisms: functional characterization using new analysis and information visualization methods.

Authors:  H J Sofia; G Chen; B G Hetzler; J F Reyes-Spindola; N E Miller
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Structural studies of viperin, an antiviral radical SAM enzyme.

Authors:  Michael K Fenwick; Yue Li; Peter Cresswell; Yorgo Modis; Steven E Ealick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structural Basis of the Substrate Selectivity of Viperin.

Authors:  Michael K Fenwick; Dan Su; Min Dong; Hening Lin; Steven E Ealick
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  A naturally occurring antiviral ribonucleotide encoded by the human genome.

Authors:  Anthony S Gizzi; Tyler L Grove; Jamie J Arnold; Joyce Jose; Rohit K Jangra; Scott J Garforth; Quan Du; Sean M Cahill; Natalya G Dulyaninova; James D Love; Kartik Chandran; Anne R Bresnick; Craig E Cameron; Steven C Almo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Radical S-Adenosylmethionine Enzymes in Human Health and Disease.

Authors:  Bradley J Landgraf; Erin L McCarthy; Squire J Booker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 23.643

10.  Dph3 is an electron donor for Dph1-Dph2 in the first step of eukaryotic diphthamide biosynthesis.

Authors:  Min Dong; Xiaoyang Su; Boris Dzikovski; Emily E Dando; Xuling Zhu; Jintang Du; Jack H Freed; Hening Lin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  1 in total

1.  The vulnerability of radical SAM enzymes to oxidants and soft metals.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar Rohaun; James A Imlay
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 10.787

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.