Literature DB >> 34147629

Meaningful associations in the adolescent brain cognitive development study.

Anthony Steven Dick1, Daniel A Lopez2, Ashley L Watts3, Steven Heeringa4, Chase Reuter5, Hauke Bartsch6, Chun Chieh Fan7, David N Kennedy8, Clare Palmer9, Andrew Marshall10, Frank Haist11, Samuel Hawes1, Thomas E Nichols12, Deanna M Barch13, Terry L Jernigan8, Hugh Garavan14, Steven Grant15, Vani Pariyadath15, Elizabeth Hoffman16, Michael Neale17, Elizabeth A Stuart18, Martin P Paulus19, Kenneth J Sher3, Wesley K Thompson20.   

Abstract

The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study is the largest single-cohort prospective longitudinal study of neurodevelopment and children's health in the United States. A cohort of n = 11,880 children aged 9-10 years (and their parents/guardians) were recruited across 22 sites and are being followed with in-person visits on an annual basis for at least 10 years. The study approximates the US population on several key sociodemographic variables, including sex, race, ethnicity, household income, and parental education. Data collected include assessments of health, mental health, substance use, culture and environment and neurocognition, as well as geocoded exposures, structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and whole-genome genotyping. Here, we describe the ABCD Study aims and design, as well as issues surrounding estimation of meaningful associations using its data, including population inferences, hypothesis testing, power and precision, control of covariates, interpretation of associations, and recommended best practices for reproducible research, analytical procedures and reporting of results.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent brain cognitive development study; Covariate Adjustments; Effect Sizes; Genetics; Hypothesis testing; Population neuroscience; Reproducibility

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34147629      PMCID: PMC8803401          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  58 in total

1.  Reporting the size of effects in research studies to facilitate assessment of practical or clinical significance.

Authors:  H C Kraemer
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.905

2.  Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Derek D Rucker; Robert C MacCallum; W Alan Nicewander
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2005-06

3.  Mathematics. Bayes' theorem in the 21st century.

Authors:  Bradley Efron
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  A dirty dozen: twelve p-value misconceptions.

Authors:  Steven Goodman
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.851

5.  No evidence for a bilingual executive function advantage in the nationally representative ABCD study.

Authors:  Anthony Steven Dick; Nelcida L Garcia; Shannon M Pruden; Wesley K Thompson; Samuel W Hawes; Matthew T Sutherland; Michael C Riedel; Angela R Laird; Raul Gonzalez
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-05-20

6.  The Failure of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing When Studying Incremental Changes, and What to Do About It.

Authors:  Andrew Gelman
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-09-07

7.  An introduction to sensitivity analysis for unobserved confounding in nonexperimental prevention research.

Authors:  Weiwei Liu; S Janet Kuramoto; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2013-12

8.  Relationship of family history, antisocial personality disorder and personality traits in young men at risk for alcoholism.

Authors:  M N Hesselbrock; V M Hesselbrock
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1992-11

9.  Recruiting the ABCD sample: Design considerations and procedures.

Authors:  H Garavan; H Bartsch; K Conway; A Decastro; R Z Goldstein; S Heeringa; T Jernigan; A Potter; W Thompson; D Zahs
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 6.464

Review 10.  Biospecimens and the ABCD study: Rationale, methods of collection, measurement and early data.

Authors:  Kristina A Uban; Megan K Horton; Joanna Jacobus; Charles Heyser; Wesley K Thompson; Susan F Tapert; Pamela A F Madden; Elizabeth R Sowell
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 6.464

View more
  16 in total

1.  Perspective on Beyond Statistical Significance: Finding Meaningful Effects.

Authors:  Howard J Edenberg
Journal:  Complex Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-20

2.  Transforming the Future of Adolescent Health: Opportunities From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hoffman; Kimberly LeBlanc; Susan R B Weiss; Gayathri J Dowling
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Genetic variation in endocannabinoid signaling is associated with differential network-level functional connectivity in youth.

Authors:  Lucinda M Sisk; Kristina M Rapuano; May I Conley; Abigail S Greene; Corey Horien; Monica D Rosenberg; Dustin Scheinost; R Todd Constable; Charles E Glatt; B J Casey; Dylan G Gee
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  The role of perceived threats on mental health, social, and neurocognitive youth outcomes: A multicontextual, person-centered approach.

Authors:  May I Conley; Jasmine Hernandez; Joeann M Salvati; Dylan G Gee; Arielle Baskin-Sommers
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2022-03-02

5.  Reliability and stability challenges in ABCD task fMRI data.

Authors:  James T Kennedy; Michael P Harms; Ozlem Korucuoglu; Serguei V Astafiev; Deanna M Barch; Wesley K Thompson; James M Bjork; Andrey P Anokhin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 7.400

6.  Limits to the generalizability of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of youth: An examination of ABCD Study® baseline data.

Authors:  Kelly T Cosgrove; Timothy J McDermott; Evan J White; Matthew W Mosconi; Wesley K Thompson; Martin P Paulus; Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez; Robin L Aupperle
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.224

7.  Identification and Validation of Distinct Latent Neurodevelopmental Profiles in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study.

Authors:  Sarah D Lichenstein; Corey Roos; Robert Kohler; Brian Kiluk; Kathleen M Carroll; Patrick D Worhunsky; Katie Witkiewitz; Sarah W Yip
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2021-03-09

8.  Responsible Use of Open-Access Developmental Data: The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study.

Authors:  Cortney Simmons; May I Conley; Dylan G Gee; Arielle Baskin-Sommers; Deanna M Barch; Elizabeth A Hoffman; Rebekah S Huber; William G Iacono; Bonnie J Nagel; Clare E Palmer; Chandni S Sheth; Elizabeth R Sowell; Wesley K Thompson; B J Casey
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-05-27

9.  Conduct disorder symptomatology is associated with an altered functional connectome in a large national youth sample.

Authors:  Scott Tillem; May I Conley; Arielle Baskin-Sommers
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2021-04-14

10.  Brain structural associations with depression in a large early adolescent sample (the ABCD study®).

Authors:  Xueyi Shen; Niamh MacSweeney; Stella W Y Chan; Miruna C Barbu; Mark J Adams; Stephen M Lawrie; Liana Romaniuk; Andrew M McIntosh; Heather C Whalley
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.