Literature DB >> 1287676

Reporting the size of effects in research studies to facilitate assessment of practical or clinical significance.

H C Kraemer1.   

Abstract

"Statistically significant" results may lack practical or clinical significance, and the description of results in reports of research studies is frequently incomplete or misleading in presentation of data necessary to assess such significance (effect sizes). Various common presentations are discussed, and one method of presentation of results is proposed that not only encompasses all the others, but enhances the scope of useful information conveyed in a research report. The results of the Infant Health and Development Program (IHDP) are used to illustrate the method.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1287676     DOI： 10.1016/0306-4530(92)90013-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology        ISSN： 0306-4530            Impact factor:   4.905


  15 in total

1.  Bayesian communication: a clinically significant paradigm for electronic publication.

Authors:  H P Lehmann; S N Goodman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  DSM categories and dimensions in clinical and research contexts.

Authors:  Helena Chmura Kraemer
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Clinical Decision-Making Following Disasters: Efficient Identification of PTSD Risk in Adolescents.

Authors:  Carla Kmett Danielson; Joseph R Cohen; Zachary W Adams; Eric A Youngstrom; Kathryn Soltis; Ananda B Amstadter; Kenneth J Ruggiero
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2017-01

4.  Biomarkers predicting treatment outcome in depression: what is clinically significant?

Authors:  Rudolf Uher; Katherine E Tansey; Karim Malki; Roy H Perlis
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Classroom changes in ADHD symptoms following clinic-based behavior therapy.

Authors:  David F Curtis; Stephanie Chapman; Jack Dempsey; Sarah Mire
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2013-03

6.  The relationship of changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores to ratings on the Subjective Significance Questionnaire in men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  G Rodrigues; A Bezjak; D Osoba; P Catton; D Tsuji; D Taylor; P Warde
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening.

Authors:  David Cella; Elizabeth A Hahn; Kelly Dineen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Efficacy of a brief behavioral intervention to promote condom use among female sex workers in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.

Authors:  Thomas L Patterson; Brent Mausbach; Remedios Lozada; Hugo Staines-Orozco; Shirley J Semple; Miguel Fraga-Vallejo; Prisci Orozovich; Daniela Abramovitz; Adela de la Torre; Hortensia Amaro; Gustavo Martinez; Carlos Magis-Rodríguez; Steffanie A Strathdee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The effect of draft DSM-V criteria on posttraumatic stress disorder prevalence.

Authors:  Patrick S Calhoun; Jeffrey S Hertzberg; Angela C Kirby; Michelle F Dennis; Lauren P Hair; Eric A Dedert; Jean C Beckham
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 6.505

10.  Adapting the posterior probability of diagnosis index to enhance evidence-based screening: an application to ADHD in primary care.

Authors:  Oliver Lindhiem; Lan Yu; Damion J Grasso; David J Kolko; Eric A Youngstrom
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2014-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.