Literature DB >> 35552993

Limits to the generalizability of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of youth: An examination of ABCD Study® baseline data.

Kelly T Cosgrove1,2, Timothy J McDermott1,2, Evan J White1, Matthew W Mosconi3, Wesley K Thompson4, Martin P Paulus1,5, Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez6, Robin L Aupperle7,8.   

Abstract

This study examined how resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data quality and availability relate to clinical and sociodemographic variables within the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. A sample of participants with an adequate sample of quality baseline rs-fMRI data containing low average motion (framewise displacement ≤ 0.15; low-noise; n = 4,356) was compared to a sample of participants without an adequate sample of quality data and/or containing high average motion (higher-noise; n = 7,437) using Chi-squared analyses and t-tests. A linear mixed model examined relationships between clinical and sociodemographic characteristics and average head motion in the sample with low-noise data. Relative to the sample with higher-noise data, the low-noise sample included more females, youth identified by parents as non-Hispanic white, and youth with married parents, higher parent education, and greater household incomes (ORs = 1.32-1.42). Youth in the low-noise sample were also older and had higher neurocognitive skills, lower BMIs, and fewer externalizing and neurodevelopmental problems (ds = 0.12-0.30). Within the low-noise sample, several clinical and demographic characteristics related to motion. Thus, participants with low-noise rs-fMRI data may be less representative of the general population and motion may remain a confound in this sample. Future rs-fMRI studies of youth should consider these limitations in the design and analysis stages in order to optimize the representativeness and clinical relevance of analyses and results.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABCD Study; Generalizability; Head motion; Resting-state fMRI; Sociodemographic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35552993      PMCID: PMC9296258          DOI: 10.1007/s11682-022-00665-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav        ISSN: 1931-7557            Impact factor:   3.224


  17 in total

1.  Executive functions and substance use: Relations in late adolescence and early adulthood.

Authors:  Daniel E Gustavson; Michael C Stallings; Robin P Corley; Akira Miyake; John K Hewitt; Naomi P Friedman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2017-01-02

2.  The Challenges and Opportunities of Small Effects: The New Normal in Academic Psychiatry.

Authors:  Martin P Paulus; Wesley K Thompson
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 21.596

3.  Implications of research staff demographics for psychological science.

Authors:  Serena Does; Naomi Ellemers; John F Dovidio; Jasmine B Norman; Avital Mentovich; Romy van der Lee; Phillip Atiba Goff
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2018-03-01

Review 4.  Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Jonathan D Power; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Behavioral interventions for reducing head motion during MRI scans in children.

Authors:  Deanna J Greene; Jonathan M Koller; Jacqueline M Hampton; Victoria Wesevich; Andrew N Van; Annie L Nguyen; Catherine R Hoyt; Lindsey McIntyre; Eric A Earl; Rachel L Klein; Joshua S Shimony; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar; Damien A Fair; Nico U F Dosenbach
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Meaningful associations in the adolescent brain cognitive development study.

Authors:  Anthony Steven Dick; Daniel A Lopez; Ashley L Watts; Steven Heeringa; Chase Reuter; Hauke Bartsch; Chun Chieh Fan; David N Kennedy; Clare Palmer; Andrew Marshall; Frank Haist; Samuel Hawes; Thomas E Nichols; Deanna M Barch; Terry L Jernigan; Hugh Garavan; Steven Grant; Vani Pariyadath; Elizabeth Hoffman; Michael Neale; Elizabeth A Stuart; Martin P Paulus; Kenneth J Sher; Wesley K Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; SeanN Hatton; M Daniela Cornejo; Carolina Makowski; Damien A Fair; Anthony Steven Dick; Matthew T Sutherland; B J Casey; Deanna M Barch; Michael P Harms; Richard Watts; James M Bjork; Hugh P Garavan; Laura Hilmer; Christopher J Pung; Chelsea S Sicat; Joshua Kuperman; Hauke Bartsch; Feng Xue; Mary M Heitzeg; Angela R Laird; Thanh T Trinh; Raul Gonzalez; Susan F Tapert; Michael C Riedel; Lindsay M Squeglia; Luke W Hyde; Monica D Rosenberg; Eric A Earl; Katia D Howlett; Fiona C Baker; Mary Soules; Jazmin Diaz; Octavio Ruiz de Leon; Wesley K Thompson; Michael C Neale; Megan Herting; Elizabeth R Sowell; Ruben P Alvarez; Samuel W Hawes; Mariana Sanchez; Jerzy Bodurka; Florence J Breslin; Amanda Sheffield Morris; Martin P Paulus; W Kyle Simmons; Jonathan R Polimeni; Andre van der Kouwe; Andrew S Nencka; Kevin M Gray; Carlo Pierpaoli; John A Matochik; Antonio Noronha; Will M Aklin; Kevin Conway; Meyer Glantz; Elizabeth Hoffman; Roger Little; Marsha Lopez; Vani Pariyadath; Susan Rb Weiss; Dana L Wolff-Hughes; Rebecca DelCarmen-Wiggins; Sarah W Feldstein Ewing; Oscar Miranda-Dominguez; Bonnie J Nagel; Anders J Perrone; Darrick T Sturgeon; Aimee Goldstone; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Kilian M Pohl; Devin Prouty; Kristina Uban; Susan Y Bookheimer; Mirella Dapretto; Adriana Galvan; Kara Bagot; Jay Giedd; M Alejandra Infante; Joanna Jacobus; Kevin Patrick; Paul D Shilling; Rahul Desikan; Yi Li; Leo Sugrue; Marie T Banich; Naomi Friedman; John K Hewitt; Christian Hopfer; Joseph Sakai; Jody Tanabe; Linda B Cottler; Sara Jo Nixon; Linda Chang; Christine Cloak; Thomas Ernst; Gloria Reeves; David N Kennedy; Steve Heeringa; Scott Peltier; John Schulenberg; Chandra Sripada; Robert A Zucker; William G Iacono; Monica Luciana; Finnegan J Calabro; Duncan B Clark; David A Lewis; Beatriz Luna; Claudiu Schirda; Tufikameni Brima; John J Foxe; Edward G Freedman; Daniel W Mruzek; Michael J Mason; Rebekah Huber; Erin McGlade; Andrew Prescot; Perry F Renshaw; Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd; Nicholas A Allgaier; Julie A Dumas; Masha Ivanova; Alexandra Potter; Paul Florsheim; Christine Larson; Krista Lisdahl; Michael E Charness; Bernard Fuemmeler; John M Hettema; Hermine H Maes; Joel Steinberg; Andrey P Anokhin; Paul Glaser; Andrew C Heath; Pamela A Madden; Arielle Baskin-Sommers; R Todd Constable; Steven J Grant; Gayathri J Dowling; Sandra A Brown; Terry L Jernigan; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 7.400

Review 8.  The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites.

Authors:  B J Casey; Tariq Cannonier; May I Conley; Alexandra O Cohen; Deanna M Barch; Mary M Heitzeg; Mary E Soules; Theresa Teslovich; Danielle V Dellarco; Hugh Garavan; Catherine A Orr; Tor D Wager; Marie T Banich; Nicole K Speer; Matthew T Sutherland; Michael C Riedel; Anthony S Dick; James M Bjork; Kathleen M Thomas; Bader Chaarani; Margie H Mejia; Donald J Hagler; M Daniela Cornejo; Chelsea S Sicat; Michael P Harms; Nico U F Dosenbach; Monica Rosenberg; Eric Earl; Hauke Bartsch; Richard Watts; Jonathan R Polimeni; Joshua M Kuperman; Damien A Fair; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  Physical characteristics not psychological state or trait characteristics predict motion during resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Hamed Ekhtiari; Rayus Kuplicki; Hung-Wen Yeh; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; George F Koob; Robert T Croyle; Diana W Bianchi; Joshua A Gordon; Walter J Koroshetz; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; William T Riley; Michele H Bloch; Kevin Conway; Bethany G Deeds; Gayathri J Dowling; Steven Grant; Katia D Howlett; John A Matochik; Glen D Morgan; Margaret M Murray; Antonio Noronha; Catherine Y Spong; Eric M Wargo; Kenneth R Warren; Susan R B Weiss
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.464

View more
  2 in total

1.  Incorporating Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory to combat systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color in clinical neuroscience.

Authors:  Teresa Girolamo; Termara C Parker; Inge-Marie Eigsti
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.152

2.  Striatal reactivity during emotion and reward relates to approach-avoidance conflict behaviour and is altered in adults with anxiety or depression.

Authors:  Timothy J McDermott; Hannah Berg; James Touthang; Elisabeth Akeman; Mallory J Cannon; Jessica Santiago; Kelly T Cosgrove; Ashley N Clausen; Namik Kirlic; Ryan Smith; Michelle G Craske; James L Abelson; Martin P Paulus; Robin L Aupperle
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.699

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.