Literature DB >> 15998176

Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations.

Kristopher J Preacher1, Derek D Rucker, Robert C MacCallum, W Alan Nicewander.   

Abstract

Analysis of continuous variables sometimes proceeds by selecting individuals on the basis of extreme scores of a sample distribution and submitting only those extreme scores to further analysis. This sampling method is known as the extreme groups approach (EGA). EGA is often used to achieve greater statistical power in subsequent hypothesis tests. However, there are several largely unrecognized costs associated with EGA that must be considered. The authors illustrate the effects EGA can have on power, standardized effect size, reliability, model specification, and the interpretability of results. Finally, the authors discuss alternative procedures, as well as possible legitimate uses of EGA. The authors urge researchers, editors, reviewers, and consumers to carefully assess the extent to which EGA is an appropriate tool in their own research and in that of others.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15998176     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  139 in total

1.  Risk-taking behaviors of adolescents with extreme obesity: normative or not?

Authors:  Megan Benoit Ratcliff; Todd M Jenkins; Jennifer Reiter-Purtill; Jennie G Noll; Meg H Zeller
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Classifying retrieval strategies as a function of working memory.

Authors:  Jenni L Schelble; David J Therriault; M David Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

Review 3.  Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: expressing and interpreting associations and effect sizes in clinical outcome assessments.

Authors:  Lori D McLeod; Joseph C Cappelleri; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Testing the cross-stressor hypothesis under real-world conditions: exercise as a moderator of the association between momentary anxiety and cardiovascular responses.

Authors:  Ipek Ensari; Joseph E Schwartz; Donald Edmondson; Andrea T Duran; Daichi Shimbo; Keith M Diaz
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2020-04-22

5.  Age differences in the perception of hierarchical structure in events.

Authors:  Christopher A Kurby; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

6.  Working memory and the revision of syntactic and discourse ambiguities.

Authors:  William S Evans; David Caplan; Adam Ostrowski; Jennifer Michaud; Anthony J Guarino; Gloria Waters
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2014-12-08

7.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

Authors:  Ariel N James; Scott H Fraundorf; Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Heightened extended amygdala metabolism following threat characterizes the early phenotypic risk to develop anxiety-related psychopathology.

Authors:  A J Shackman; A S Fox; J A Oler; S E Shelton; T R Oakes; R J Davidson; N H Kalin
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 15.992

9.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Specificity in autobiographical memory narratives correlates with performance on the autobiographical memory test and prospectively predicts depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Jennifer A Sumner; Susan Mineka; Dan P McAdams
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.