Literature DB >> 35245674

Reliability and stability challenges in ABCD task fMRI data.

James T Kennedy1, Michael P Harms2, Ozlem Korucuoglu2, Serguei V Astafiev2, Deanna M Barch2, Wesley K Thompson3, James M Bjork4, Andrey P Anokhin2.   

Abstract

Trait stability of measures is an essential requirement for individual differences research. Functional MRI has been increasingly used in studies that rely on the assumption of trait stability, such as attempts to relate task related brain activation to individual differences in behavior and psychopathology. However, recent research using adult samples has questioned the trait stability of task-fMRI measures, as assessed by test-retest correlations. To date, little is known about trait stability of task fMRI in children. Here, we examined within-session reliability and long-term stability of individual differences in task-fMRI measures using fMRI measures of brain activation provided by the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) Study Release v4.0 as an individual's average regional activity, using its tasks focused on reward processing, response inhibition, and working memory. We also evaluated the effects of factors potentially affecting reliability and stability. Reliability and stability (quantified as the ratio of non-scanner related stable variance to all variances) was poor in virtually all brain regions, with an average value of 0.088 and 0.072 for short term (within-session) reliability and long-term (between-session) stability, respectively, in regions of interest (ROIs) historically-recruited by the tasks. Only one reliability or stability value in ROIs exceeded the 'poor' cut-off of 0.4, and in fact rarely exceeded 0.2 (only 4.9%). Motion had a pronounced effect on estimated reliability/stability, with the lowest motion quartile of participants having a mean reliability/stability 2.5 times higher (albeit still 'poor') than the highest motion quartile. Poor reliability and stability of task-fMRI, particularly in children, diminishes potential utility of fMRI data due to a drastic reduction of effect sizes and, consequently, statistical power for the detection of brain-behavior associations. This essential issue urgently needs to be addressed through optimization of task design, scanning parameters, data acquisition protocols, preprocessing pipelines, and data denoising methods.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35245674      PMCID: PMC9017319          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   7.400


  85 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability of amygdala response to emotional faces.

Authors:  Colin L Sauder; Greg Hajcak; Mike Angstadt; K Luan Phan
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Shared Genetic Factors Influence Head Motion During MRI and Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Karen Hodgson; Russell A Poldrack; Joanne E Curran; Emma E Knowles; Samuel Mathias; Harald H H Göring; Nailin Yao; Rene L Olvera; Peter T Fox; Laura Almasy; Ravi Duggirala; Deanna M Barch; John Blangero; David C Glahn
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  How stable is activation in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex in adolescence? A study of emotional face processing across three measurements.

Authors:  Bianca G van den Bulk; P Cédric M P Koolschijn; Paul H F Meens; Natasja D J van Lang; Nic J A van der Wee; Serge A R B Rombouts; Robert R J M Vermeiren; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 6.464

4.  Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains.

Authors:  Evan M Gordon; Timothy O Laumann; Adrian W Gilmore; Dillan J Newbold; Deanna J Greene; Jeffrey J Berg; Mario Ortega; Catherine Hoyt-Drazen; Caterina Gratton; Haoxin Sun; Jacqueline M Hampton; Rebecca S Coalson; Annie L Nguyen; Kathleen B McDermott; Joshua S Shimony; Abraham Z Snyder; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen; Steven M Nelson; Nico U F Dosenbach
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature.

Authors:  Christophe Destrieux; Bruce Fischl; Anders Dale; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Stability of amygdala BOLD response to fearful faces over multiple scan sessions.

Authors:  Tom Johnstone; Leah H Somerville; Andrew L Alexander; Terrence R Oakes; Richard J Davidson; Ned H Kalin; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Using temporal ICA to selectively remove global noise while preserving global signal in functional MRI data.

Authors:  Matthew F Glasser; Timothy S Coalson; Janine D Bijsterbosch; Samuel J Harrison; Michael P Harms; Alan Anticevic; David C Van Essen; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers.

Authors:  Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Christian F Beckmann; Matthew F Glasser; Ludovica Griffanti; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Meaningful associations in the adolescent brain cognitive development study.

Authors:  Anthony Steven Dick; Daniel A Lopez; Ashley L Watts; Steven Heeringa; Chase Reuter; Hauke Bartsch; Chun Chieh Fan; David N Kennedy; Clare Palmer; Andrew Marshall; Frank Haist; Samuel Hawes; Thomas E Nichols; Deanna M Barch; Terry L Jernigan; Hugh Garavan; Steven Grant; Vani Pariyadath; Elizabeth Hoffman; Michael Neale; Elizabeth A Stuart; Martin P Paulus; Kenneth J Sher; Wesley K Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; George F Koob; Robert T Croyle; Diana W Bianchi; Joshua A Gordon; Walter J Koroshetz; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; William T Riley; Michele H Bloch; Kevin Conway; Bethany G Deeds; Gayathri J Dowling; Steven Grant; Katia D Howlett; John A Matochik; Glen D Morgan; Margaret M Murray; Antonio Noronha; Catherine Y Spong; Eric M Wargo; Kenneth R Warren; Susan R B Weiss
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.464

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Amygdala and Depression: A Sober Reconsideration.

Authors:  Shannon E Grogans; Andrew S Fox; Alexander J Shackman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 19.242

2.  Classifying Conduct Disorder Using a Biopsychosocial Model and Machine Learning Method.

Authors:  Lena Chan; Cortney Simmons; Scott Tillem; May Conley; Inti A Brazil; Arielle Baskin-Sommers
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2022-02-22

3.  A practical guide for researchers and reviewers using the ABCD Study and other large longitudinal datasets.

Authors:  Natalie M Saragosa-Harris; Natasha Chaku; Niamh MacSweeney; Victoria Guazzelli Williamson; Maximilian Scheuplein; Brandee Feola; Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez; Ece Demir-Lira; Elizabeth A McNeilly; Landry Goodgame Huffman; Lucy Whitmore; Kalina J Michalska; Katherine Sf Damme; Divyangana Rakesh; Kathryn L Mills
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.811

4.  Age-related change in task-evoked amygdala-prefrontal circuitry: A multiverse approach with an accelerated longitudinal cohort aged 4-22 years.

Authors:  Paul Alexander Bloom; Michelle VanTieghem; Laurel Gabard-Durnam; Dylan G Gee; Jessica Flannery; Christina Caldera; Bonnie Goff; Eva H Telzer; Kathryn L Humphreys; Dominic S Fareri; Mor Shapiro; Sameah Algharazi; Niall Bolger; Mariam Aly; Nim Tottenham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 5.399

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.