Comparison of sequential and fixed-structure sampling of pedigrees in complex segregation analysis of a quantitative trait.

In designing a study to demonstrate the existence of a major locus for a quantitative trait, an investigator chooses a sampling rule to ascertain pedigrees. The choice of sampling rule can significantly affect the study's power. Here, we compare two types of sampling rules for family studies: fixed-structure rules, in which the same set of relatives are sampled for each proband, and sequential rules, in which the relative or relatives to be sampled next may depend on the trait values of the individuals already observed. We compare fixed-structure and sequential sampling in the setting of extended pedigrees, a quantitative trait, and the genetic mixed model. Using computer simulation, we show that sequential sampling can increase power to detect segregation at a dominant major locus by over 60% in comparison with fixed-structure sampling. Just as important, this substantially increased power is obtained with an easily implemented sampling rule, one that might reasonably be employed in a family study of a quantitative trait.