Literature DB >> 2816944

Testing separate families of segregation hypotheses: bootstrap methods.

N Schork1, M A Schork.   

Abstract

Aspects of the statistical modeling and assessment of hypotheses concerning quantitative traits in genetics research are discussed. It is suggested that a traditional approach to such modeling and hypothesis testing, whereby competing models are "nested" in an effort to simplify their probabilistic assessment, can be complimented by an alternative statistical paradigm - the separate-families-of-hypotheses approach to segregation analysis. Two bootstrap-based methods are described that allow testing of any two, possibly non-nested, parametric genetic hypotheses. These procedures utilize a strategy in which the unknown distribution of a likelihood ratio-based test statistic is simulated, thereby allowing the estimation of critical values for the test statistic. Though the focus of this paper concerns quantitative traits, the strategies described can be applied to qualitative traits as well. The conceptual advantages and computational ease of these strategies are discussed, and their significance levels and power are examined through Monte Carlo experimentation. It is concluded that the separate-families-of-hypotheses approach, when carried out with the methods described in this paper, not only possesses some favorable statistical properties but also is well suited for genetic segregation analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2816944      PMCID: PMC1683425     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  14 in total

1.  Extensions to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method.

Authors:  K Lange; J Westlake; M A Spence
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  Comparison of sequential and fixed-structure sampling of pedigrees in complex segregation analysis of a quantitative trait.

Authors:  M Boehnke; M R Young; P P Moll
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Analysis of family resemblance. 3. Complex segregation of quantitative traits.

Authors:  N E Morton; C J MacLean
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Major locus analysis for quantitative traits.

Authors:  R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A unified model for complex segregation analysis.

Authors:  J M Lalouel; D C Rao; N E Morton; R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Errors of inference in the detection of major gene effects on psychological test scores.

Authors:  L J Eaves
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis.

Authors:  J L Hopper; J D Mathews
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.670

8.  On the statistical determination of major gene mechanisms in continuous human traits: regressive models.

Authors:  G E Bonney
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1984-08

9.  Hypertension and sodium-lithium countertransport in Utah pedigrees: evidence for major-locus inheritance.

Authors:  S J Hasstedt; L L Wu; K O Ash; H Kuida; R R Williams
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Genetic determination of plasma apolipoprotein AI in a population-based sample.

Authors:  P P Moll; V V Michels; W H Weidman; B A Kottke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  1 in total

1.  Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.

Authors:  D B Allison; M C Neale; R Zannolli; N J Schork; C I Amos; J Blangero
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.025

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.