Literature DB >> 2912068

Identifying pedigrees segregating at a major locus for a quantitative trait: an efficient strategy for linkage analysis.

M Boehnke1, P P Moll.   

Abstract

Having found evidence for segregation at a major locus for a quantitative trait, a logical next step is to identify those pedigrees in which major-locus segregation is occurring. If the quantitative trait is a risk factor for an associated disease, identifying such segregating pedigrees can be important in classifying families by etiology, in risk assessment, and in suggesting treatment modalities. Identifying segregating pedigrees can also be helpful in selecting pedigrees to include in a subsequent linkage study to map the major locus. Here, we describe a strategy to identify pedigrees segregating at a major locus for a quantitative trait. We apply this pedigree selection strategy to simulated data generated under a major-locus or mixed model with a rare dominant allele and sampled according to one of several fixed-structure or sequential sampling designs. We demonstrate that for the situations considered, the pedigree selection strategy is sensitive and specific and that a linkage study based only on the pedigrees classified as segregating extracts essentially all the linkage information in the entire sample of pedigrees. Our results suggest that for large-scale linkage studies involving many genetic markers, the savings from this strategy can be substantial and that, compared with fixed-structure sampling, sequential sampling of pedigrees can greatly improve the efficiency for linkage analysis of a quantitative trait.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2912068      PMCID: PMC1715404     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  20 in total

1.  Application of the lod method to the detection of linkage between a quantitative trait and a qualitative marker: a simulation experiment.

Authors:  K Lange; M A Spence; M B Frank
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Ascertainment in the sequential sampling of pedigrees.

Authors:  C Cannings; E A Thompson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Estimation of the recombination fraction in human pedigrees: efficient computation of the likelihood for human linkage studies.

Authors:  J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Analysis of family resemblance. 3. Complex segregation of quantitative traits.

Authors:  N E Morton; C J MacLean
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; J Stewart
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  Genetic regulation of plasma and red blood cell magnesium concentration in man. II. Segregation analysis.

Authors:  J M Lalouel; P Darlu; J G Henrotte; D C Rao
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Detection of genetic heterogeneity among pedigrees through complex segregation analysis: an application to hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  P P Moll; T D Berry; W H Weidman; R Ellefson; H Gordon; B A Kottke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis.

Authors:  J L Hopper; J D Mathews
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Complex segregation analysis of hyperlipidemia in a Seattle sample.

Authors:  W R Williams; J M Lalouel
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 0.444

10.  A mixed-model likelihood approximation on large pedigrees.

Authors:  S J Hasstedt
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1982-06
View more
  11 in total

1.  Genetic and environmental explanations for the distribution of sodium-lithium countertransport in pedigrees from Rochester, MN.

Authors:  T R Rebbeck; S T Turner; V V Michels; P P Moll
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Current perspectives on the genetics of unipolar depression.

Authors:  S O Moldin; T Reich; J P Rice
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Linkage analysis of quantitative traits: increased power by using selected samples.

Authors:  G Carey; J Williamson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Linkage between loci of quantitative traits and marker loci: multi-trait analysis with a single marker.

Authors:  Y I Ronin; V M Kirzhner; A B Korol
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Sample-size guidelines for linkage analysis of a dominant locus for a quantitative trait by the method of lod scores.

Authors:  M Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Selecting pedigrees for linkage analysis of a quantitative trait: the expected number of informative meioses.

Authors:  M Boehnke; K H Omoto; J M Arduino
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Interval mapping of quantitative trait loci employing correlated trait complexes.

Authors:  A B Korol; Y I Ronin; V M Kirzhner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Single- and multiple-trait mapping analysis of linked quantitative trait loci. Some asymptotic analytical approximations.

Authors:  Y I Ronin; A B Korol; E Nevo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genome scan for spelling deficits: effects of verbal IQ on models of transmission and trait gene localization.

Authors:  Kevin Rubenstein; Mark Matsushita; Virginia W Berninger; Wendy H Raskind; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Estimating the probability for major gene Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  L A Farrer; L A Cupples
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.