Literature DB >> 952492

Extensions to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method.

K Lange, J Westlake, M A Spence.   

Abstract

The classic variance components for simple polygenic traits - additive, dominance, and environmental variance - have traditionally been estimated from sample covariances between first-degree relatives. If data is gathered on pedigrees, this statistical procedure wastes information. Recently Elston & Stewart suggested an alternative likelihood procedure that uses all the information in a set of pedigrees. A refinement of their method based on the scoring technique gives rapidly converging maximum likelihood estimates of the variance components and of the male and female means. Tests of statistical hypotheses about the various parameters can then be made by the likelihood ratio method. Furthermore, using classical regression analysis, the estimated parameter values allow prediction of unknown trait values from known trait values within a pedigree. These methods should apply to traits like total finger ridge count and to quantitative measurements associated with disease traits. Since the model postulates independent environmental effects and no assortative mating, its utility in human behaviour genetics seems limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 952492     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1976.tb00156.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Genet        ISSN: 0003-4800            Impact factor:   1.670


  90 in total

1.  Assessment of parent-of-origin effects in linkage analysis of quantitative traits.

Authors:  R L Hanson; S Kobes; R S Lindsay; W C Knowler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Broad and narrow heritabilities of quantitative traits in a founder population.

Authors:  M Abney; M S McPeek; C Ober
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Joint multipoint linkage analysis of multivariate qualitative and quantitative traits. I. Likelihood formulation and simulation results.

Authors:  J T Williams; P Van Eerdewegh; L Almasy; J Blangero
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Large upward bias in estimation of locus-specific effects from genomewide scans.

Authors:  H H Göring; J D Terwilliger; J Blangero
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Exact multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in pedigrees by variance components.

Authors:  S C Pratt; M J Daly; L Kruglyak
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Genetic and environmental effects on type A scores in monozygotic twin families.

Authors:  K Tambs; J M Sundet; L Eaves; K Berg
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Social contact and sibling similarity: facts, issues, and red herrings.

Authors:  R J Rose; J Kaprio; C J Williams; R Viken; K Obremski
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Quantitative trait locus analysis of longitudinal quantitative trait data in complex pedigrees.

Authors:  Stuart Macgregor; Sara A Knott; Ian White; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Etiological heterogeneity in the development of antisocial behavior: the Virginia Twin Study of Adolescent Behavioral Development and the Young Adult Follow-Up.

Authors:  Judy L Silberg; Michael Rutter; Kelly Tracy; Hermine H Maes; Lindon Eaves
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Cortical thickness or grey matter volume? The importance of selecting the phenotype for imaging genetics studies.

Authors:  Anderson M Winkler; Peter Kochunov; John Blangero; Laura Almasy; Karl Zilles; Peter T Fox; Ravindranath Duggirala; David C Glahn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.