Literature DB >> 34136817

Three-dimensional U-Net Convolutional Neural Network for Detection and Segmentation of Intracranial Metastases.

Jeffrey D Rudie1, David A Weiss1, John B Colby1, Andreas M Rauschecker1, Benjamin Laguna1, Steve Braunstein1, Leo P Sugrue1, Christopher P Hess1, Javier E Villanueva-Meyer1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a neural network for automated detection and segmentation of intracranial metastases on brain MRI studies obtained for stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 413 patients (average age, 61 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 238 women) with a total of 5202 intracranial metastases (median volume, 0.05 cm3; interquartile range, 0.02-0.18 cm3) undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery at one institution were included (January 2017 to February 2020). A total of 563 MRI examinations were performed among the patients, and studies were split into training (n = 413), validation (n = 50), and test (n = 100) datasets. A three-dimensional (3D) U-Net convolutional network was trained and validated on 413 T1 postcontrast or subtraction scans, and several loss functions were evaluated. After model validation, 100 discrete test patients, who underwent imaging after the training and validation patients, were used for final model evaluation. Performance for detection and segmentation of metastases was evaluated using Dice scores, false discovery rates, and false-negative rates, and a comparison with neuroradiologist interrater reliability was performed.
RESULTS: The median Dice score for segmenting enhancing metastases in the test set was 0.75 (interquartile range, 0.63-0.84). There were strong correlations between manually segmented and predicted metastasis volumes (r = 0.98, P < .001) and between the number of manually segmented and predicted metastases (R = 0.95, P < .001). Higher Dice scores were strongly correlated with larger metastasis volumes on a logarithmically transformed scale (r = 0.71). Sensitivity across the whole test sample was 70.0% overall and 96.4% for metastases larger than 6 mm. There was an average of 0.46 false-positive results per scan, with the positive predictive value being 91.5%. In comparison, the median Dice score between two neuroradiologists was 0.85 (interquartile range, 0.80-0.89), with sensitivity across the test sample being 87.9% overall and 98.4% for metastases larger than 6 mm.
CONCLUSION: A 3D U-Net-based convolutional neural network was able to segment brain metastases with high accuracy and perform detection at the level of human interrater reliability for metastases larger than 6 mm.Keywords: Adults, Brain/Brain Stem, CNS, Feature detection, MR-Imaging, Neural Networks, Neuro-Oncology, Quantification, Segmentation© RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34136817      PMCID: PMC8204134          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  19 in total

Review 1.  Brain metastases: epidemiology.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Christina Huang Wright; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

Review 2.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Erratum: Construction of a Machine Learning Dataset through Collaboration: The RSNA 2019 Brain CT Hemorrhage Challenge.

Authors:  Adam E Flanders; Luciano M Prevedello; George Shih; Safwan S Halabi; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Robyn Ball; John T Mongan; Anouk Stein; Felipe C Kitamura; Matthew P Lungren; Gagandeep Choudhary; Lesley Cala; Luiz Coelho; Monique Mogensen; Fanny Morón; Elka Miller; Ichiro Ikuta; Vahe Zohrabian; Olivia McDonnell; Christie Lincoln; Lubdha Shah; David Joyner; Amit Agarwal; Ryan K Lee; Jaya Nath
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-07-29

4.  Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection.

Authors:  Tsung-Yi Lin; Priya Goyal; Ross Girshick; Kaiming He; Piotr Dollar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Computer-aided detection of metastatic brain tumors using automated three-dimensional template matching.

Authors:  Robert D Ambrosini; Peng Wang; Walter G O'Dell
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases on multimodal MR images with a deep convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Odelin Charron; Alex Lallement; Delphine Jarnet; Vincent Noblet; Jean-Baptiste Clavier; Philippe Meyer
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Computer-aided Detection of Brain Metastases in T1-weighted MRI for Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using Deep Learning Single-Shot Detectors.

Authors:  Zijian Zhou; Jeremiah W Sanders; Jason M Johnson; Maria K Gule-Monroe; Melissa M Chen; Tina M Briere; Yan Wang; Jong Bum Son; Mark D Pagel; Jing Li; Jingfei Ma
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Fast robust automated brain extraction.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Rudie; Andreas M Rauschecker; R Nick Bryan; Christos Davatzikos; Suyash Mohan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Deep convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation of brain metastases trained on clinical data.

Authors:  Khaled Bousabarah; Maximilian Ruge; Julia-Sarita Brand; Mauritius Hoevels; Daniel Rueß; Jan Borggrefe; Nils Große Hokamp; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; David Maintz; Harald Treuer; Martin Kocher
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  4 in total

1.  Deep-learning and radiomics ensemble classifier for false positive reduction in brain metastases segmentation.

Authors:  Zi Yang; Mingli Chen; Mahdieh Kazemimoghadam; Lin Ma; Strahinja Stojadinovic; Robert Timmerman; Tu Dan; Zabi Wardak; Weiguo Lu; Xuejun Gu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Alternations and Applications of the Structural and Functional Connectome in Gliomas: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Ziyan Chen; Ningrong Ye; Chubei Teng; Xuejun Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Automated detection and quantification of brain metastases on clinical MRI data using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Irada Pflüger; Tassilo Wald; Fabian Isensee; Marianne Schell; Hagen Meredig; Kai Schlamp; Denise Bernhardt; Gianluca Brugnara; Claus Peter Heußel; Juergen Debus; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Philipp Vollmuth
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-08-23

4.  Automatic segmentation of brain metastases using T1 magnetic resonance and computed tomography images.

Authors:  Dylan G Hsu; Åse Ballangrud; Achraf Shamseddine; Joseph O Deasy; Harini Veeraraghavan; Laura Cervino; Kathryn Beal; Michalis Aristophanous
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.174

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.