Literature DB >> 34315148

Automatic segmentation of brain metastases using T1 magnetic resonance and computed tomography images.

Dylan G Hsu1, Åse Ballangrud1, Achraf Shamseddine2, Joseph O Deasy1, Harini Veeraraghavan1, Laura Cervino1, Kathryn Beal2, Michalis Aristophanous1.   

Abstract

An increasing number of patients with multiple brain metastases are being treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Manually identifying and contouring all metastatic lesions is difficult and time-consuming, and a potential source of variability. Hence, we developed a 3D deep learning approach for segmenting brain metastases on MR and CT images. Five-hundred eleven patients treated with SRS were retrospectively identified for this study. Prior to radiotherapy, the patients were imaged with 3D T1 spoiled-gradient MR post-Gd (T1 + C) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), which were co-registered by a treatment planner. The gross tumor volume contours, authored by the attending radiation oncologist, were taken as the ground truth. There were 3 ± 4 metastases per patient, with volume up to 57 ml. We produced a multi-stage model that automatically performs brain extraction, followed by detection and segmentation of brain metastases using co-registered T1 + C and CECT. Augmented data from 80% of these patients were used to train modified 3D V-Net convolutional neural networks for this task. We combined a normalized boundary loss function with soft Dice loss to improve the model optimization, and employed gradient accumulation to stabilize the training. The average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for brain extraction was 0.975 ± 0.002 (95% CI). The detection sensitivity per metastasis was 90% (329/367), with moderate dependence on metastasis size. Averaged across 102 test patients, our approach had metastasis detection sensitivity 95 ± 3%, 2.4 ± 0.5 false positives, DSC of 0.76 ± 0.03, and 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance of 2.5 ± 0.3 mm (95% CIs). The volumes of automatic and manual segmentations were strongly correlated for metastases of volume up to 20 ml (r=0.97,p<0.001). This work expounds a fully 3D deep learning approach capable of automatically detecting and segmenting brain metastases using co-registered T1 + C and CECT.
© 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CECT; MRI; boundary loss; brain metastases; convolutional neural network; deep learning; skull stripping

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34315148      PMCID: PMC9345139          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac1835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   4.174


  32 in total

1.  Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentation.

Authors:  Hoel Kervadec; Jihene Bouchtiba; Christian Desrosiers; Eric Granger; Jose Dolz; Ismail Ben Ayed
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Brain metastases as preventive and therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Patricia S Steeg; Kevin A Camphausen; Quentin R Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Deep learning enables automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases on multisequence MRI.

Authors:  Endre Grøvik; Darvin Yi; Michael Iv; Elizabeth Tong; Daniel Rubin; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Brain metastases detection on MR by means of three-dimensional tumor-appearance template matching.

Authors:  Úrsula Pérez-Ramírez; Estanislao Arana; David Moratal
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Fast robust automated brain extraction.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  The effect of bevacizumab (Avastin) on neuroimaging of brain metastases.

Authors:  Marlon S Mathews; Mark E Linskey; Anton N Hasso; John P Fruehauf
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2008-02-08

7.  Three-dimensional U-Net Convolutional Neural Network for Detection and Segmentation of Intracranial Metastases.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Rudie; David A Weiss; John B Colby; Andreas M Rauschecker; Benjamin Laguna; Steve Braunstein; Leo P Sugrue; Christopher P Hess; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-03-10

8.  Imaging of brain metastases.

Authors:  Kathleen R Fink; James R Fink
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-05-02

9.  A deep convolutional neural network-based automatic delineation strategy for multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Strahinja Stojadinovic; Brian Hrycushko; Zabi Wardak; Steven Lau; Weiguo Lu; Yulong Yan; Steve B Jiang; Xin Zhen; Robert Timmerman; Lucien Nedzi; Xuejun Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Institutional experience with SRS VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases.

Authors:  Åse Ballangrud; Li Cheng Kuo; Laura Happersett; Seng Boh Lim; Kathryn Beal; Yoshiya Yamada; Margie Hunt; James Mechalakos
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.