Literature DB >> 34952535

Deep-learning and radiomics ensemble classifier for false positive reduction in brain metastases segmentation.

Zi Yang1, Mingli Chen1, Mahdieh Kazemimoghadam1, Lin Ma1, Strahinja Stojadinovic1, Robert Timmerman1, Tu Dan1, Zabi Wardak1, Weiguo Lu1, Xuejun Gu1,2.   

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is now the standard of care for brain metastases (BMs) patients. The SRS treatment planning process requires precise target delineation, which in clinical workflow for patients with multiple (>4) BMs (mBMs) could become a pronounced time bottleneck. Our group has developed an automated BMs segmentation platform to assist in this process. The accuracy of the auto-segmentation, however, is influenced by the presence of false-positive segmentations, mainly caused by the injected contrast during MRI acquisition. To address this problem and further improve the segmentation performance, a deep-learning and radiomics ensemble classifier was developed to reduce the false-positive rate in segmentations. The proposed model consists of a Siamese network and a radiomic-based support vector machine (SVM) classifier. The 2D-based Siamese network contains a pair of parallel feature extractors with shared weights followed by a single classifier. This architecture is designed to identify the inter-class difference. On the other hand, the SVM model takes the radiomic features extracted from 3D segmentation volumes as the input for twofold classification, either a false-positive segmentation or a true BM. Lastly, the outputs from both models create an ensemble to generate the final label. The performance of the proposed model in the segmented mBMs testing dataset reached the accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE) and area under the curve of 0.91, 0.96, 0.90 and 0.93, respectively. After integrating the proposed model into the original segmentation platform, the average segmentation false negative rate (FNR) and the false positive over the union (FPoU) were 0.13 and 0.09, respectively, which preserved the initial FNR (0.07) and significantly improved the FPoU (0.55). The proposed method effectively reduced the false-positive rate in the BMs raw segmentations indicating that the integration of the proposed ensemble classifier into the BMs segmentation platform provides a beneficial tool for mBMs SRS management.
© 2022 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain metastases; classification; stereotactic radiosurgery

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34952535      PMCID: PMC8858586          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  30 in total

1.  Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling.

Authors:  Vladimir Svetnik; Andy Liaw; Christopher Tong; J Christopher Culberson; Robert P Sheridan; Bradley P Feuston
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

2.  Multi-Task Deep Model With Margin Ranking Loss for Lung Nodule Analysis.

Authors:  Lihao Liu; Qi Dou; Hao Chen; Jing Qin; Pheng-Ann Heng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Enhanced image quality in black-blood MRI using the improved motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium (iMSDE) sequence.

Authors:  Jinnan Wang; Vasily L Yarnykh; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

Authors:  M Vallières; C R Freeman; S R Skamene; I El Naqa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery compared with whole brain radiotherapy for resected metastatic brain disease (NCCTG N107C/CEC·3): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Paul D Brown; Karla V Ballman; Jane H Cerhan; S Keith Anderson; Xiomara W Carrero; Anthony C Whitton; Jeffrey Greenspoon; Ian F Parney; Nadia N I Laack; Jonathan B Ashman; Jean-Paul Bahary; Costas G Hadjipanayis; James J Urbanic; Fred G Barker; Elana Farace; Deepak Khuntia; Caterina Giannini; Jan C Buckner; Evanthia Galanis; David Roberge
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System.

Authors:  Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Andrew E Sloan; Faith G Davis; Fawn D Vigneau; Ping Lai; Raymond E Sawaya
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Deep model with Siamese network for viable and necrotic tumor regions assessment in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Yu Fu; Peng Xue; Huizhong Ji; Wentao Cui; Enqing Dong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Comparison of plan quality and delivery time between volumetric arc therapy (RapidArc) and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple cranial metastases.

Authors:  Evan M Thomas; Richard A Popple; Xingen Wu; Grant M Clark; James M Markert; Barton L Guthrie; Yu Yuan; Michael C Dobelbower; Sharon A Spencer; John B Fiveash
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Automated Brain Metastases Detection Framework for T1-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced 3D MRI.

Authors:  Engin Dikici; John L Ryu; Mutlu Demirer; Matthew Bigelow; Richard D White; Wayne Slone; Barbaros Selnur Erdal; Luciano M Prevedello
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 5.772

10.  Automatic detection and segmentation of multiple brain metastases on magnetic resonance image using asymmetric UNet architecture.

Authors:  Yufeng Cao; April Vassantachart; Jason C Ye; Cheng Yu; Dan Ruan; Ke Sheng; Yi Lao; Zhilei Liu Shen; Salim Balik; Shelly Bian; Gabriel Zada; Almon Shiu; Eric L Chang; Wensha Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.