Literature DB >> 32181729

Computer-aided Detection of Brain Metastases in T1-weighted MRI for Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using Deep Learning Single-Shot Detectors.

Zijian Zhou1, Jeremiah W Sanders1, Jason M Johnson1, Maria K Gule-Monroe1, Melissa M Chen1, Tina M Briere1, Yan Wang1, Jong Bum Son1, Mark D Pagel1, Jing Li1, Jingfei Ma1.   

Abstract

Background Brain metastases are manually identified during stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment planning, which is time consuming and potentially challenging. Purpose To develop and investigate deep learning (DL) methods for detecting brain metastasis with MRI to aid in treatment planning for SRS. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, contrast material-enhanced three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo MRI scans from patients who underwent gamma knife SRS from January 2011 to August 2018 were analyzed. Brain metastases were manually identified and contoured by neuroradiologists and treating radiation oncologists. DL single-shot detector (SSD) algorithms were constructed and trained to map axial MRI slices to a set of bounding box predictions encompassing metastases and associated detection confidences. Performances of different DL SSDs were compared for per-lesion metastasis-based detection sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) at a 50% confidence threshold. For the highest-performing model, detection performance was analyzed by using free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results Two hundred sixty-six patients (mean age, 60 years ± 14 [standard deviation]; 148 women) were randomly split into 80% training and 20% testing groups (212 and 54 patients, respectively). For the testing group, sensitivity of the highest-performing (baseline) SSD was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80%, 82%; 190 of 234) and PPV was 36% (95% CI: 35%, 37%; 190 of 530). For metastases measuring at least 6 mm, sensitivity was 98% (95% CI: 97%, 99%; 130 of 132) and PPV was 36% (95% CI: 35%, 37%; 130 of 366). Other models (SSD with a ResNet50 backbone, SSD with focal loss, and RetinaNet) yielded lower sensitivities of 73% (95% CI: 72%, 74%; 171 of 234), 77% (95% CI: 76%, 78%; 180 of 234), and 79% (95% CI: 77%, 81%; 184 of 234), respectively, and lower PPVs of 29% (95% CI: 28%, 30%; 171 of 581), 26% (95% CI: 26%, 26%; 180 of 681), and 13% (95% CI: 12%, 14%; 184 of 1412). Conclusion Deep-learning single-shot detector models detected nearly all brain metastases that were 6 mm or larger with limited false-positive findings using postcontrast T1-weighted MRI. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Kikinis and Wells in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32181729     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

Review 1.  Machine Learning-Based Radiomics in Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Felix Ehret; David Kaul; Hans Clusmann; Daniel Delev; Julius M Kernbach
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

2.  Automated detection of brain metastases on non-enhanced CT using single-shot detectors.

Authors:  Shimpei Kato; Shiori Amemiya; Hidemasa Takao; Hiroshi Yamashita; Naoya Sakamoto; Osamu Abe
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Detection of Brain Metastases with Deep Learning Single-Shot Detector Algorithms.

Authors:  Ron Kikinis; William M Wells
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Semisupervised Training of a Brain MRI Tumor Detection Model Using Mined Annotations.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Swinburne; Vivek Yadav; Julie Kim; Ye R Choi; David C Gutman; Jonathan T Yang; Nelson Moss; Jacqueline Stone; Jamie Tisnado; Vaios Hatzoglou; Sofia S Haque; Sasan Karimi; John Lyo; Krishna Juluru; Karl Pichotta; Jianjiong Gao; Sohrab P Shah; Andrei I Holodny; Robert J Young
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in oncological imaging.

Authors:  H M C Cheung; D Rubin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.389

6.  Brain metastasis detection using machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Se Jin Cho; Leonard Sunwoo; Sung Hyun Baik; Yun Jung Bae; Byung Se Choi; Jae Hyoung Kim
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Detection System for Automated Treatment Response Assessment of Brain Metastases on 3D MRI.

Authors:  Jungheum Cho; Young Jae Kim; Leonard Sunwoo; Gi Pyo Lee; Toan Quang Nguyen; Se Jin Cho; Sung Hyun Baik; Yun Jung Bae; Byung Se Choi; Cheolkyu Jung; Chul-Ho Sohn; Jung-Ho Han; Chae-Yong Kim; Kwang Gi Kim; Jae Hyoung Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence in Brain Tumour Surgery-An Emerging Paradigm.

Authors:  Simon Williams; Hugo Layard Horsfall; Jonathan P Funnell; John G Hanrahan; Danyal Z Khan; William Muirhead; Danail Stoyanov; Hani J Marcus
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Three-dimensional U-Net Convolutional Neural Network for Detection and Segmentation of Intracranial Metastases.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Rudie; David A Weiss; John B Colby; Andreas M Rauschecker; Benjamin Laguna; Steve Braunstein; Leo P Sugrue; Christopher P Hess; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-03-10

10.  Deep Neural Network for Differentiation of Brain Tumor Tissue Displayed by Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Andreas Ziebart; Denis Stadniczuk; Veronika Roos; Miriam Ratliff; Andreas von Deimling; Daniel Hänggi; Frederik Enders
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.