Literature DB >> 19363722

Comparison of dual-time-constant and fast-acting automatic gain control (AGC) systems in cochlear implants.

Patrick J Boyle1, Andreas Büchner, Michael A Stone, Thomas Lenarz, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants usually employ an automatic gain control (AGC) system as a first stage of processing. AGC1 was a fast-acting (syllabic) compressor. AGC2 was a dual-time-constant system; it usually performed as a slow-acting compressor, but incorporated an additional fast-acting system to provide protection from sudden increases in sound level. Six experienced cochlear-implant users were tested in a counterbalanced order, receiving one-month of experience with a given AGC type before switching to the other type. Performance was evaluated shortly after provision of a given AGC type and after one-month of experience with that AGC type. Questionnaires, mainly relating to listening in quiet situations, did not reveal significant differences between the two AGC types. However, fixed-level and roving-level tests of sentence identification in noise both revealed significantly better performance for AGC2. It is suggested that the poorer performance for AGC1 occurred because AGC1 introduced cross-modulation between the target speech and background noise, which made perceptual separation of the target and background more difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19363722     DOI: 10.1080/14992020802581982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  19 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the xDP output compression strategy for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli; Nicolas Guevara; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Marine Ardoint; Sonia Saaï; Michel Hoen; Dan Gnansia; Philippe Romanet; Jean-Pierre Lavieille
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Comparison of Intensity Discrimination between Children Using Cochlear Implants and Typically Developing Children.

Authors:  Shubha Tak; Asha Yathiraj
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  Effect of signal processing strategy and stimulation type on speech and auditory perception in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Susan M Reynolds; René H Gifford
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 4.  [Technical advancements in cochlear implants : State of the art].

Authors:  A Büchner; L Gärtner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Simulations of the effect of unlinked cochlear-implant automatic gain control and head movement on interaural level differences.

Authors:  Alan W Archer-Boyd; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Personalizing Transient Noise Reduction Algorithm Settings for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  H Christiaan Stronks; Annemijn L Tops; Phillipp Hehrmann; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Head Shadow, Summation, and Squelch in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users With Linked Automatic Gain Controls.

Authors:  Taylor A Bakal; Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Chen Chen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Setting and reaching targets with computer-assisted cochlear implant fitting.

Authors:  Bart Vaerenberg; Geert De Ceulaer; Zoltán Szlávik; Patrizia Mancini; Andreas Buechner; Paul J Govaerts
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-16

10.  Effects of Bilateral Automatic Gain Control Synchronization in Cochlear Implants With and Without Head Movements: Sound Source Localization in the Frontal Hemifield.

Authors:  M Torben Pastore; Kathryn R Pulling; Chen Chen; William A Yost; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.