Literature DB >> 22225049

Dynamic-range compression affects the lateral position of sounds.

Ian M Wiggins1, Bernhard U Seeber.   

Abstract

Dynamic-range compression acting independently at each ear in a bilateral hearing-aid or cochlear-implant fitting can alter interaural level differences (ILDs) potentially affecting spatial perception. The influence of compression on the lateral position of sounds was studied in normal-hearing listeners using virtual acoustic stimuli. In a lateralization task, listeners indicated the leftmost and rightmost extents of the auditory event and reported whether they heard (1) a single, stationary image, (2) a moving/gradually broadening image, or (3) a split image. Fast-acting compression significantly affected the perceived position of high-pass sounds. For sounds with abrupt onsets and offsets, compression shifted the entire image to a more central position. For sounds containing gradual onsets and offsets, including speech, compression increased the occurrence of moving and split images by up to 57 percentage points and increased the perceived lateral extent of the auditory event. The severity of the effects was reduced when undisturbed low-frequency binaural cues were made available. At high frequencies, listeners gave increased weight to ILDs relative to interaural time differences carried in the envelope when compression caused ILDs to change dynamically at low rates, although individual differences were apparent. Specific conditions are identified in which compression is likely to affect spatial perception.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22225049     DOI: 10.1121/1.3652887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Apparent auditory source width insensitivity in older hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Bernhard U Seeber; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Simulations of the effect of unlinked cochlear-implant automatic gain control and head movement on interaural level differences.

Authors:  Alan W Archer-Boyd; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Head Shadow, Summation, and Squelch in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users With Linked Automatic Gain Controls.

Authors:  Taylor A Bakal; Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Chen Chen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Comparison of the benefits of cochlear implantation versus contra-lateral routing of signal hearing aids in adult patients with single-sided deafness: study protocol for a prospective within-subject longitudinal trial.

Authors:  Pádraig T Kitterick; Gerard M O'Donoghue; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Andrew Marshall; Ellen Jeffs; Louise Craddock; Alison Riley; Kevin Green; Martin O'Driscoll; Dan Jiang; Terry Nunn; Shakeel Saeed; Wanda Aleksy; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2014-08-11

8.  Effects of Bilateral Automatic Gain Control Synchronization in Cochlear Implants With and Without Head Movements: Sound Source Localization in the Frontal Hemifield.

Authors:  M Torben Pastore; Kathryn R Pulling; Chen Chen; William A Yost; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.

Authors:  Carol A Sammeth; Nathaniel T Greene; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Time-Varying Distortions of Binaural Information by Bilateral Hearing Aids: Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Francisco A Rodriguez; Cory D F Portnuff; Matthew J Goupell; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.