Literature DB >> 25373973

Sound source localization identification accuracy: bandwidth dependencies.

William A Yost1, Xuan Zhong1.   

Abstract

Sound source localization accuracy using a sound source identification task was measured in the front, right quarter of the azimuth plane as rms (root-mean-square) error (degrees) for stimulus conditions in which the bandwidth (1/20 to 2 octaves wide) and center frequency (250, 2000, 4000 Hz) of 200-ms noise bursts were varied. Tones of different frequencies (250, 2000, 4000 Hz) were also used. As stimulus bandwidth increases, there is an increase in sound source localization identification accuracy (i.e., rms error decreases). Wideband stimuli (>1 octave wide) produce best sound source localization accuracy (~6°-7° rms error), and localization accuracy for these wideband noise stimuli does not depend on center frequency. For narrow bandwidths (<1 octave) and tonal stimuli, accuracy does depend on center frequency such that highest accuracy is obtained for low-frequency stimuli (centered on 250 Hz), worse accuracy for mid-frequency stimuli (centered on 2000 Hz), and intermediate accuracy for high-frequency stimuli (centered on 4000 Hz).

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25373973     DOI: 10.1121/1.4898045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  How many images are in an auditory scene?

Authors:  Xuan Zhong; William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sound source localization identification accuracy: Level and duration dependencies.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sound source localization is a multisystem process.

Authors:  William A Yost; M Torben Pastore; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01

5.  Sound source localization identification accuracy: Envelope dependencies.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial variation in signal and sensory precision both constrain auditory acuity at high frequencies.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Victor Benichoux; Heath G Jones; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  On the localization of high-frequency, sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in free field.

Authors:  Eric J Macaulay; Brad Rakerd; Thomas J Andrews; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spatial Release from Masking for Tones and Noises in a Soundfield under Conditions Where Targets and Maskers Are Stationary or Moving.

Authors:  M Torben Pastore; William A Yost
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-02-23

9.  Effects of Bilateral Automatic Gain Control Synchronization in Cochlear Implants With and Without Head Movements: Sound Source Localization in the Frontal Hemifield.

Authors:  M Torben Pastore; Kathryn R Pulling; Chen Chen; William A Yost; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Auditory motion perception emerges from successive sound localizations integrated over time.

Authors:  Vincent Roggerone; Jonathan Vacher; Cynthia Tarlao; Catherine Guastavino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.