Literature DB >> 34091551

Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies.

Robert Montés-Micó1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate repeatability and agreement between various biometric parameters using 6 biometers based on different optical technologies.
SETTING: University of Valencia, Spain.
DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series.
METHODS: 150 eyes were measured using the Aladdin, AL-Scan, Argos, IOLMaster700, Lenstar LS900, and OA-2000 biometers. Keratometry (K1 and K2), J0 and J45, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), white to white (WTW), and pupil size (PS) were measured 5 times with each device. Intrasubject SD, coefficient of variability (CoV), coefficient of repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland -Altman graphs were analyzed.
RESULTS: CoV values were <0.30% for K1, K2, and AL and up to 1.61% for CCT, ACD, LT, and WTW. PS values were higher (from 4.2% to 7.68%). There was statistically significant differences between biometers for all parameters evaluated (P < .001), and these differences varied as a function of the parameter analyzed. The limit of agreement (LoA) width of some comparisons for K1 and the majority for K2 were >0.50 diopter. A similar pattern was found for J0/J45. For CCT, many comparisons showed LoA width values of >25 μm. The LoA width for ACD ranged from 0.366 mm to 0.175 mm and for LT was about 0.2 mm. AL showed a highest LoA width of 0.225 mm. The LoA width for WTW was, in most cases, about ≥0.50 mm. The LoA width for PS ranged from 1.578 mm to 3.541 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The 6 biometers provided repeatable measurements for the different parameters analyzed. The LoA obtained for each comparison should be analyzed carefully to consider the interchangeability of these devices.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34091551      PMCID: PMC8700306          DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of Axial Length, Corneal Curvature, and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements of 2 Recently Introduced Devices to a Known Biometer.

Authors:  Mehdi Shajari; Carla Cremonese; Kerstin Petermann; Pankaj Singh; Michael Müller; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Intrasession Repeatability of Biometric Measurements Obtained with a Low-Coherence Interferometry System in Pseudophakic Eyes.

Authors:  Hideki Fukumitsu; Vicent J Camps; David P Piñero
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.424

3.  Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter.

Authors:  Nesrin Buyuktortop Gokcinar; Erhan Yumusak; Nurgul Ornek; Serap Yorubulut; Zafer Onaran
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices.

Authors:  Mustafa Doğan; Elif Ertan
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster.

Authors:  Jinhai Huang; Giacomo Savini; Jian Li; Weicong Lu; Fan Wu; Jing Wang; Yaolin Li; Yifan Feng; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients.

Authors:  Robert Montés-Micó; Francesco Carones; Antonietta Buttacchio; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; David Madrid-Costa
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry.

Authors:  Emre Güler; Ali Ender Kulak; Yüksel Totan; Armağan Yuvarlak; İbrahim Feyzi Hepşen
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.077

8.  Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.

Authors:  Sabong Srivannaboon; Chareenun Chirapapaisan; Pratuangsri Chonpimai; Siriwan Loket
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Evaluation of the Repeatability and the Reproducibility of AL-Scan Measurements Obtained by Residents.

Authors:  Mehmet Kola; Hikmet Duran; Adem Turk; Suleyman Mollamehmetoglu; Ahmet Kalkisim; Hidayet Erdol
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Comparison of anterior segment measurements using Sirius Topographer® and Nidek Axial Length-Scan® with assessing repeatability in patients with cataracts.

Authors:  Resat Duman; Ersan Çetinkaya; Rahmi Duman; Mustafa Dogan; Mehmet Cem Sabaner
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  1 in total

1.  Agreement of axial length and anterior segment parameters measured with the MYAH device compared to Pentacam AXL and IOLMaster 700 in myopic children.

Authors:  Huri Sabur; Omer Takes
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 2.029

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.